Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com>
To: <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
	<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <takamitz@amazon.co.jp>,
	<kuniyu@amazon.com>, <kohei.enju@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Avoid pointless capability searches
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:20:08 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250221022008.69533-1-enjuk@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250215000301.175097-2-helgaas@kernel.org>

> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> Many of the save/restore functions in the pci_save_state() and
> pci_restore_state() paths depend on both a PCI capability of the device and
> a pci_cap_saved_state structure to hold the configuration data, and they
> skip the operation if either is missing.
> 
> Look for the pci_cap_saved_state first so if we don't have one, we can skip
> searching for the device capability, which requires several slow config
> space accesses.
> 
> Remove some error messages if the pci_cap_saved_state is not found so we
> don't complain about having no saved state for a capability the device
> doesn't have.  We have already warned in pci_allocate_cap_save_buffers() if
> the capability is present but we were unable to allocate a buffer.
> 
> Other than the message change, no functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci.c       | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 869d204a70a3..503376bf7e75 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -1686,10 +1686,8 @@ static int pci_save_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	save_state = pci_find_saved_cap(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> -	if (!save_state) {
> -		pci_err(dev, "buffer not found in %s\n", __func__);
> +	if (!save_state)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
>  
>  	cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0];
>  	pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &cap[i++]);
> @@ -1742,19 +1740,17 @@ static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  
>  static int pci_save_pcix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
> -	int pos;
>  	struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state;
> +	u8 pos;
> +
> +	save_state = pci_find_saved_cap(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
> +	if (!save_state)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	pos = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
>  	if (!pos)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	save_state = pci_find_saved_cap(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
> -	if (!save_state) {
> -		pci_err(dev, "buffer not found in %s\n", __func__);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}

When devices don't have PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX, this change in order appears to 
cause a functional change.
Since probe functions of some drivers (e.g. Intel e1000) rely on the return 
value, I think they fail after that change in this situation.

Actually in my QEMU VM, e1000 driver failed to probe the device due to 
-ENOMEM from pci_save_pcix_state().
```
[root@localhost ~]# dmesg | grep e1000
[    0.400303] [      T1] e1000: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver
[    0.400805] [      T1] e1000: Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
[    0.710970] [      T1] e1000 0000:00:03.0: probe with driver e1000 failed with error -12

[root@localhost ~]# lspci -nnvs 00:03.0
00:03.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller [8086:100e] (rev 03)
        Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc. QEMU Virtual Machine [1af4:1100]
        Flags: fast devsel, IRQ 11
        Memory at febc0000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
        I/O ports at c000 [size=64]
        Expansion ROM at feb80000 [disabled] [size=256K]
lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -2
```

Regarding pci_save_vc_state(), I found that similar comments were provided in 
this context:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/7dbb0d8b-3708-60ba-ee9e-78aa48bee160@linux.intel.com/

However, the same type of order change is still left in 
pci_save_pcix_state().

> -
>  	pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_X_CMD,
>  			     (u16 *)save_state->cap.data);
>  
> @@ -1763,14 +1759,19 @@ static int pci_save_pcix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  
>  static void pci_restore_pcix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
> -	int i = 0, pos;
>  	struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state;
> +	u8 pos;
> +	int i = 0;
>  	u16 *cap;
>  
>  	save_state = pci_find_saved_cap(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
> -	pos = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
> -	if (!save_state || !pos)
> +	if (!save_state)
>  		return;
> +
> +	pos = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
> +	if (!pos)
> +		return;
> +
>  	cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0];
>  
>  	pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_X_CMD, cap[i++]);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index e0bc90597dca..007e4a082e6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -35,16 +35,14 @@ void pci_save_ltr_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
>  		return;
>  
> +	save_state = pci_find_saved_ext_cap(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_LTR);
> +	if (!save_state)
> +		return;
> +
>  	ltr = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_LTR);
>  	if (!ltr)
>  		return;
>  
> -	save_state = pci_find_saved_ext_cap(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_LTR);
> -	if (!save_state) {
> -		pci_err(dev, "no suspend buffer for LTR; ASPM issues possible after resume\n");
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	/* Some broken devices only support dword access to LTR */
>  	cap = &save_state->cap.data[0];
>  	pci_read_config_dword(dev, ltr + PCI_LTR_MAX_SNOOP_LAT, cap);
> @@ -57,8 +55,11 @@ void pci_restore_ltr_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	u32 *cap;
>  
>  	save_state = pci_find_saved_ext_cap(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_LTR);
> +	if (!save_state)
> +		return;
> +
>  	ltr = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_LTR);
> -	if (!save_state || !ltr)
> +	if (!ltr)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* Some broken devices only support dword access to LTR */
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Regards,
Kohei

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-21  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-15  0:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Avoid capability searches in save/restore state Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-15  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Avoid pointless capability searches Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-15  7:34   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-21  2:20   ` Kohei Enju [this message]
2025-03-04 14:12   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-04 15:34     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-15  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: Cache offset of Resizable BAR capability Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Avoid capability searches in save/restore state Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250221022008.69533-1-enjuk@amazon.com \
    --to=enjuk@amazon.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kohei.enju@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=takamitz@amazon.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox