From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE160233729; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741631167; cv=none; b=NZoZX5qT5OEwiCFKWvizPkts15W90DyzHzN3JdKEQcbx8wTpVwc2Kr20amxHZJHKekc6Lz9KZg8jszaUq7Asl+JThPNFRLA/McMAY0qs5FsdZwz64fo6oY6Y5BS/avmkpVwbpJQEe9wQ0FGC/iaL1bflrsbV1pQw6W9Vv/7X+Uk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741631167; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cyNfw5aBnRiDdtv4MSSnga2Y5mDwrbotVHovHS6Sauo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fVvocER8kgf3mwDr4StkW6ENGL23p0ShPWoPafH1Vaf/qDRrXd5gZMBsxcaAKxpyhqdGRy7Jn7eE5BsJbpT7JsAnQDHCfWXZ6Ei/WkO7dnNp7KfydCeaNPmYbrAhJxG5mnYAre0hLajbPOE4bF8GzbYOTwRHLKp61saY754cZVQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TtNKjWT7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TtNKjWT7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D8CDC4CEE5; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:26:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741631167; bh=cyNfw5aBnRiDdtv4MSSnga2Y5mDwrbotVHovHS6Sauo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TtNKjWT7oRQTj2VMb24xngME8b/ZIFZJ8uA6QGOrpkikPN2iawvwjW5D/EdZGVgJ6 mdhJArF2pnyTRzPsVOr+bvNeQmfRCk5jqwj+zWCK/xMYf5araeiKymYmCWbRSVzlMW MCIWoqd4zTSlbYY4nglNWdp9UUOaR5hhSh11FZhyV5RXZVhptiCtwYRxfVuReQVUrv 4aGfYc3fbhcjzRH+KXwMBaosRpOtelUQeWLQjzXBPj/XpWdI8QPP7DZy/Gsdf2xb2h lrZWqz4/ArMDIftqwSYzRKqiVfFMxzPKpEyT1b4CoZeXVOoaErmgGnq6hAXwJQJTW5 TdzEkSS1BZFdg== Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 03:26:05 +0900 From: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= To: kernel test robot Cc: Niklas Cassel , llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [pci:endpoint-test 16/18] drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c:316:3: error: field designator 'intx_capable' does not refer to any field in type 'const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops' Message-ID: <20250310182605.GA1179150@rocinante> References: <202503110151.vQXf5yof-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202503110151.vQXf5yof-lkp@intel.com> Hello, [...] > vim +316 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c > > 313 > 314 static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops rockchip_pcie_ep_ops = { > 315 .init = rockchip_pcie_ep_init, > > 316 .intx_capable = false, > 317 .raise_irq = rockchip_pcie_raise_irq, > 318 .get_features = rockchip_pcie_get_features, > 319 }; > 320 I moved setting the .intx_capable property to false to the pci_epc_features struct definition for RK3568, which is what I believe the intention was. Have a look at: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=endpoint-test&id=cb349262d9770e6478a7e91bdf438122b8cda44d Let me know if this is OK with you. Krzysztof