From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B330E2E3387; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742832520; cv=none; b=cyHnQTr+kJVxqZmFp0OAAXkowX94dTBp/MIsmAHumUIP0nxJkfixdSuslK4vBHT1h1m/qast7NBWeTfvxnTMbiVnEfZgXETLWdfHDHeUWZlJqz1bGM7Zu6YUCzsqbGdJILw0mQzpPbqo3HdNYF29dMjmPrjHLkb6i2sAqPBko0A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742832520; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uFHH2lwI0Hjlf+4iID1Ge3PrHz8y0Zaq/bXqOrfZV/A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tw9GtD/P3sm3lrbWd2FR7sqDqPPeNR7iSuBbyVKQPvXUut/ZhNwRcGtoD9YvBpP7hnVsY0kfldMcCGNahbmDqXDoQCIYd2iTV5VOU2JGGm0tcar2zwjttb/NSkumCx6PscMvY7vd0TptZn3EcDKG/1PyamRB241eDfBcK80Y1uE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SPv7bNe4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SPv7bNe4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18451C4CEE9; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:08:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742832520; bh=uFHH2lwI0Hjlf+4iID1Ge3PrHz8y0Zaq/bXqOrfZV/A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=SPv7bNe4C8BXr7Vq4e/JJp/viQqxELXHZxSNVQ2q7khTuXOcRWNmGMkI3pnhq6MZJ kBLQTsIEZFUMee42P/Z9B+Gkqg3uGolwRdjXNCUbtc+3t4rw/Oinl4LAEhZ+gjLXiD av5FN1dcCfv25f5ZOXhX/FnFAqjcO8Vwi0pi/r9SU6QL1Eh4bg/yMJc6vax794fGVi zG0OWuPDUyi+/2PBpldR+YWIfYGDYUTLLdcmKhwRNacr3yv43GZ5/F1+SzYTNnucxT 6EWjt7HTlGnfQwWehbE2RdMnPHA1WTelBkxjzghp2DEQR+LWWpdH5elPzsdZBfA8JE 4UEdweCfuMokA== Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:08:38 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Mike Looijmans Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Michal Simek , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcie-xilinx: Support reset GPIO and wait for link-up status Message-ID: <20250324160838.GA1251294@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0e7637a0-8b8f-4aa7-be46-1e7b8ac07a45@topic.nl> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 04:46:55PM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote: > On 24-03-2025 08:49, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 03:59:02PM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote: > > > Support providing the PERST reset signal through a devicetree binding. Use "PERST#" to include the polarity and match the spec usage. > > > As the PCIe spec mentions about 120 ms time to establish a link, we'll > > > allow up to 200ms before giving up. > > > > > This should be a separate change/patch. > > Indeed, this is a separate issue, I'll split it in two parts. And please include a specific spec reference, e.g., "PCIe r6.0, sec x.y.z".