From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, En-Wei Wu <en-wei.wu@canonical.com>,
vitaly.lifshits@intel.com, dima.ruinskiy@intel.com,
"Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@canonical.com>,
Mor Bar-Gabay <morx.bar.gabay@intel.com>,
Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] igc: return early when failing to read EECD register
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:34:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250418193411.GA168278@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107190150.1758577-4-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
[+cc Kalesh, Przemek, linux-pci]
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 11:01:47AM -0800, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> From: En-Wei Wu <en-wei.wu@canonical.com>
>
> When booting with a dock connected, the igc driver may get stuck for ~40
> seconds if PCIe link is lost during initialization.
>
> This happens because the driver access device after EECD register reads
> return all F's, indicating failed reads. Consequently, hw->hw_addr is set
> to NULL, which impacts subsequent rd32() reads. This leads to the driver
> hanging in igc_get_hw_semaphore_i225(), as the invalid hw->hw_addr
> prevents retrieving the expected value.
>
> To address this, a validation check and a corresponding return value
> catch is added for the EECD register read result. If all F's are
> returned, indicating PCIe link loss, the driver will return -ENXIO
> immediately. This avoids the 40-second hang and significantly improves
> boot time when using a dock with an igc NIC.
>
> Log before the patch:
> [ 0.911913] igc 0000:70:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 0.912386] igc 0000:70:00.0: PTM enabled, 4ns granularity
> [ 1.571098] igc 0000:70:00.0 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): PCIe link lost, device now detached
> [ 43.449095] igc_get_hw_semaphore_i225: igc 0000:70:00.0 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Driver can't access device - SMBI bit is set.
> [ 43.449186] igc 0000:70:00.0: probe with driver igc failed with error -13
> [ 46.345701] igc 0000:70:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 46.345777] igc 0000:70:00.0: PTM enabled, 4ns granularity
>
> Log after the patch:
> [ 1.031000] igc 0000:70:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 1.032097] igc 0000:70:00.0: PTM enabled, 4ns granularity
> [ 1.642291] igc 0000:70:00.0 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): PCIe link lost, device now detached
> [ 5.480490] igc 0000:70:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 5.480516] igc 0000:70:00.0: PTM enabled, 4ns granularity
>
> Fixes: ab4056126813 ("igc: Add NVM support")
> Cc: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: En-Wei Wu <en-wei.wu@canonical.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Mor Bar-Gabay <morx.bar.gabay@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c
> index 9fae8bdec2a7..1613b562d17c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ static s32 igc_init_nvm_params_base(struct igc_hw *hw)
> u32 eecd = rd32(IGC_EECD);
> u16 size;
>
> + /* failed to read reg and got all F's */
> + if (!(~eecd))
> + return -ENXIO;
I don't understand this. It looks like a band-aid that makes boot
faster but doesn't solve the real problem.
In its defense, I guess that with this patch, the first igc probe
fails, and then for some reason we attempt another a few seconds
later, and the second igc probe works fine, so the NIC actually does
end up working correct, right?
I think the PCI core has some issues with configuring ASPM L1.2, and I
wonder if those are relevant here. If somebody can repro the problem
(i.e., without this patch, which looks like it appeared in v6.13 as
bd2776e39c2a ("igc: return early when failing to read EECD
register")), I wonder if you could try booting with "pcie_port_pm=off
pcie_aspm.policy=performance" and see if that also avoids the problem?
If so, I'd like to see the dmesg log with "pci=earlydump" and the
"sudo lspci -vv" output when booted with and without "pcie_port_pm=off
pcie_aspm.policy=performance".
> size = FIELD_GET(IGC_EECD_SIZE_EX_MASK, eecd);
>
> /* Added to a constant, "size" becomes the left-shift value
> @@ -221,6 +225,8 @@ static s32 igc_get_invariants_base(struct igc_hw *hw)
>
> /* NVM initialization */
> ret_val = igc_init_nvm_params_base(hw);
> + if (ret_val)
> + goto out;
> switch (hw->mac.type) {
> case igc_i225:
> ret_val = igc_init_nvm_params_i225(hw);
> --
> 2.47.1
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-18 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250107190150.1758577-4-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2025-04-18 19:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-04-22 17:16 ` [PATCH net 3/3] igc: return early when failing to read EECD register Tony Nguyen
[not found] ` <CAMqyJG1nm2mYnsXeF=h_xM_0ydAVFK9gdEznJO8hwd-B_2sm_w@mail.gmail.com>
2025-04-23 9:12 ` En-Wei WU
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250418193411.GA168278@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=en-wei.wu@canonical.com \
--cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morx.bar.gabay@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=vitaly.lifshits@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox