From: Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>
To: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, jgg@nvidia.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 rc] iommu: Skip PASID validation for devices without PASID capability
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:54:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250430025426.976139-1-tdave@nvidia.com> (raw)
Generally PASID support requires ACS settings that usually create
single device groups, but there are some niche cases where we can get
multi-device groups and still have working PASID support. The primary
issue is that PCI switches are not required to treat PASID tagged TLPs
specially so appropriate ACS settings are required to route all TLPs to
the host bridge if PASID is going to work properly.
pci_enable_pasid() does check that each device that will use PASID has
the proper ACS settings to achieve this routing.
However, no-PASID devices can be combined with PASID capable devices
within the same topology using non-uniform ACS settings. In this case
the no-PASID devices may not have strict route to host ACS flags and
end up being grouped with the PASID devices.
This configuration fails to allow use of the PASID within the iommu
core code which wrongly checks if the no-PASID device supports PASID.
Fix this by ignoring no-PASID devices during the PASID validation. They
will never issue a PASID TLP anyhow so they can be ignored.
Fixes: c404f55c26fc ("iommu: Validate the PASID in iommu_attach_device_pasid()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>
---
changes in v2:
- added no-pasid check in __iommu_set_group_pasid and __iommu_remove_group_pasid
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 60aed01e54f2..8251b07f4022 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -3329,8 +3329,9 @@ static int __iommu_set_group_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
int ret;
for_each_group_device(group, device) {
- ret = domain->ops->set_dev_pasid(domain, device->dev,
- pasid, NULL);
+ if (device->dev->iommu->max_pasids > 0)
+ ret = domain->ops->set_dev_pasid(domain, device->dev,
+ pasid, NULL);
if (ret)
goto err_revert;
}
@@ -3342,7 +3343,8 @@ static int __iommu_set_group_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
for_each_group_device(group, device) {
if (device == last_gdev)
break;
- iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain);
+ if (device->dev->iommu->max_pasids > 0)
+ iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain);
}
return ret;
}
@@ -3353,8 +3355,10 @@ static void __iommu_remove_group_pasid(struct iommu_group *group,
{
struct group_device *device;
- for_each_group_device(group, device)
- iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain);
+ for_each_group_device(group, device) {
+ if (device->dev->iommu->max_pasids > 0)
+ iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -3391,7 +3395,13 @@ int iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
for_each_group_device(group, device) {
- if (pasid >= device->dev->iommu->max_pasids) {
+ /*
+ * Skip PASID validation for devices without PASID support
+ * (max_pasids = 0). These devices cannot issue transactions
+ * with PASID, so they don't affect group's PASID usage.
+ */
+ if ((device->dev->iommu->max_pasids > 0) &&
+ (pasid >= device->dev->iommu->max_pasids)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 2:54 Tushar Dave [this message]
2025-05-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 rc] iommu: Skip PASID validation for devices without PASID capability Baolu Lu
2025-05-01 10:58 ` Vasant Hegde
2025-05-01 21:00 ` Tushar Dave
2025-05-05 11:33 ` Vasant Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250430025426.976139-1-tdave@nvidia.com \
--to=tdave@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox