From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3467022AE65; Thu, 8 May 2025 16:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746721637; cv=none; b=sr+z1zHB00Fd4m+JX/OKoSrqriFZ/jOx7E0Y0rmlB8D5xCI0dD0nXXZ5n+Emxbdxw60Gfn+ZuGaamZ0/8UOXLfuL+WYC7zLED0vv2gnwfJlyyLumVWJDqPjmY6I+QzT9BevgcnH5X9w7M22IwbLoO1dBY9Frj9l672JNH8sIwic= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746721637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=akmsc7Idl/CS0YX85M/o15zpf4CB1w+47LOq+bjRS/Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YI1GWaheq3IUH4yaBUhtWSMB0MIS0rATKKObty2T74lqStkGydFC5uU+8CeYVRqBY/91tMYMVumNiZUXuDb/kRSgMEHCChsxBahgUSxd4/bTDT0wi1U1TrSlcxkXsD6z00KfCeGvuvfm1w71zj0EOM1jNr/IgCCePfzDJpa9Mk0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X5/5xfBR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X5/5xfBR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E909C4CEE7; Thu, 8 May 2025 16:27:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746721636; bh=akmsc7Idl/CS0YX85M/o15zpf4CB1w+47LOq+bjRS/Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=X5/5xfBRDFswxUWUryDcM0QjyXtAEY8zLiRXY4VPEOEM/xStV26trqrotb89c9/Do VME/iaDiEdNFxRk0GE19jJIdjvnB1KDSXwjBRzAdP491FP5N3gae5Jz/KbxMb1K+lN fXDy4W/oBRhkXNCaekaWj31auEzVIvf47OoTbcuJqgWJVVj1oehXZfJCzHtuqs28Al U5qE4ureMfEPxPc4O6hCo+ULcn6MOCT1MMszpouHZurWM/0aLG7Nh5GAe6SUasPWYN gbs2yXjMZ+fNDTSR3GjS65d5b7VP9tgstySbba0OWO0PmDkULBO1su5ts+TZLK/0pJ f1UQMp17UvSWA== Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 4CD036FE; Thu, 8 May 2025 18:27:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 18:27:13 +0200 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com> Cc: Niklas Cassel , lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, heiko@sntech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, yue.wang@amlogic.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, khilman@baylibre.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: aardvark: Remove redundant MPS configuration Message-ID: <20250508162713.tbdeggybijz36dia@pali> References: <20250506173439.292460-1-18255117159@163.com> <20250506173439.292460-4-18255117159@163.com> <20250506174110.63ayeqc4scmwjj6e@pali> <8a6adc24-5f40-4f22-9842-b211e1ef5008@163.com> <20250507163620.53v5djmhj3ywrge2@pali> <25c89e3c-9625-49ac-b816-945ab9145f87@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <25c89e3c-9625-49ac-b816-945ab9145f87@163.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 On Friday 09 May 2025 00:12:24 Hans Zhang wrote: > On 2025/5/8 19:53, Niklas Cassel wrote: > > Hello Hans, > > > > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 12:47:12AM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote: > > > On 2025/5/8 00:36, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry, but I stopped doing any testing of the aardvark driver with the > > > > mainline kernel after PCI maintainers stopped taking fixes for the > > > > driver and stopped responding. > > > > > > > > I'm not going to debug same issues again, which I have analyzed, > > > > prepared fixes, sent patches and see no progress there. > > > > > > > > Seems that there is a status quo, and I'm not going to change it. > > > > > > Dear Niklas, > > > > > > Do you have any opinion on Pali's reply? Should patch 3/3 be discarded? > > > > While I do have an opinion, I'm not going to share it on a public mailing > > list :) > > > > With regards to your patch 3/3, I think that your patch looks fine, but if > > the driver maintainer does not want the cleanup for >reasons*, that is totally > > fine with me. However, I'm not a PCI maintainer, so my opinion does not really > > matter. It's the PCI maintainers that decide. > > > > Dear Niklas, > > Thank you very much for your reply. Let's wait for the decision of the PCI > maintainer on this series of patches. > > Best regards, > Hans > I do not see any cleanup in 3/3. There is just a removal of the step needed for configuring the controller.