From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AED7842C0B; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747317637; cv=none; b=Nw5CEr+t+xTM7QKjTda5S1pIaRxS1IsWO5P3L7Y4JEJsgtVoekNz60gDjTrmqx6bf7q1Ldlvv7U/fyrVI4YVg9P26sT72wu2mq60i6AeF4jWYWh/8j++HhXv/VUsuxQP/eH6kWvfLjQTqxon2Vc5iablCJGFaBgToeBXEVBwcM0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747317637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9cVRHoRN/FrnNoWySk3piyOU4+OkMbJBJ5DrHky7+/c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hghY9A3SQUO2aPsWuTuHwNj/Q4sC5kzZKTfiFUG8f++Omo55KrN3t4Bd8tPJgthkLpkNLBJ/Mm8xltQk1TXVgymsrgGTXefeykdDf1N5yhP286M2JhunhuQg1x7nCvYvCEIxFDtWu3bHbNXKuQBsFNYJivQErgu5glYA2Ug4zmo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Nz70mEL9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Nz70mEL9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6154EC4CEE7; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:00:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747317636; bh=9cVRHoRN/FrnNoWySk3piyOU4+OkMbJBJ5DrHky7+/c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Nz70mEL9PtihqeV0OBw+bFKdG3eWXIZyGg04I4PiroVKRuVt+L1oveS6bP92kG0bv 9UxedZRKQC4VssCMieZG6wma1kDOsmF0PEnwYTzRdYJZ820ZThPc96Z47aDbouIsXX geQq5kYXCKunMxzSn7XlsuGXJDXM85oOgdLfpmgHtrghFmDBfuxjS84sWEYpCxl+5M w4WRGAf8BAxwQxMeALPOgTGATjyUxlLr69C4JpvMBufc9rZgV3AZTTISNb9LsF+0Gf gfXlm1cQVFpT45bXevdjDFw7eA2LDA5UGGGtMK1htHLHtzRq539AzJsoDgbR8srIdz GL/QDYc29Ze4w== Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 23:00:34 +0900 From: Krzysztof Wilczy??ski To: Lukas Wunner Cc: Ilpo =?utf-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= , Bjorn Helgaas , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI/bwctrl: Remove also pcie_bwctrl_lbms_rwsem Message-ID: <20250515140034.GC3596832@rocinante> References: <20250508090036.1528-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> <174724335628.23991.985637450230528945.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20250515084346.GA51912@rocinante> <98fa31e7-db86-35f0-a71c-a1ebf27f93f0@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello, > > I'm a bit hesitant to mark "Accepted" state though, I did it this time > > but in general I feel I might be overstepping my authority even if I know > > some patches have been accepted. > > Bjorn has encouraged submitters to mark their own patches as "Superseded": > > "If you're really gung-ho, you can go to Patchwork [2] and mark > your superseded patches as "Superseded" so I don't have to do that > myself." > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20171026223701.GA25649@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com/ > > ... and I was assuming that also applies to marking one's own patches > as "Accepted", but I might be jumping to the wrong conclusion. Between Bjorn, Lorenzo, Mani and I, we are getting better as leveraging Patchwork for a little bit of tracking and "project management", so to speak. But, any help with the housekeeping always appreciated. :) Thank you! Krzysztof