From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 008AD1F3B97; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 20:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751316720; cv=none; b=N2EbHpkkGB+W5r7ep3XRDkPKYwWb5eWgY3fnR7caROsWxsMlp0QFRcxjdCWxasrf6ZVvBEj5W4IK194jL9+pnODzIbkIRotGzKTNY6zxXRn5+hHVn3dk9mdu7vgXksVWj9Lw46/nL6F+5jjButEQo71yfjgcV+6YIUfpxPCDXPU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751316720; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JdyRZH5BJ88ivihFwPavGB92a6PBslWIdcXsPwgE0Co=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kK/pWY1p1QuCgXVlICh/T/6SEcxGTIB1zfvXahmiDUXK8wM5cbW+1+5ZU9Tt0ceAWbDRgC6QuS9lMuzOvejfj1mVfRmIK8F1AlolohjBb6hlpjy/CJnY2cDarhN3/Vx8n6ugn3kTuq8lCIDlQmEBXsTIzDSXS/h1mKHVRDPOATI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JLaYmDt6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JLaYmDt6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70E1EC4CEE3; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 20:51:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751316719; bh=JdyRZH5BJ88ivihFwPavGB92a6PBslWIdcXsPwgE0Co=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=JLaYmDt6JBDSL87SWQR3ICatIHSv6P910ve69LvzvnESHSxqxgVfyZhEV9ooFokrW llr/FBDJHwx5wVCWDMYnafVIgukHF35ysYE4nyK5ys3CaTEABjj7Xp7i0jIMPy2pMb pEVdSjEs9vjjm2g0gkM3ZitbxmrQcYR2M6nwj2SfTWiangHO4mLrk3TxUEdsoJajbC SI4PsVDUzhS3sERZEuXaGsMVk56uItv0eraxqXP1GG5Zy3h+Dx2gUy+5lPY96RxG9t cLVTHG1xyWSYcXnKwD0CHgxS+wuENOojdkXHBG1f+Rhp62XXyg+K8Qz1bm5wdmLkBC 2bgECWzOd41uQ== Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 15:51:58 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Jingoo Han , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: dwc: Add debugfs support for PTM context Message-ID: <20250630205158.GA1809065@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250617231210.GA1172093@bhelgaas> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 06:12:10PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 07:54:41PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > Synopsys Designware PCIe IPs support PTM capability as defined in the PCIe > > spec r6.0, sec 6.21. The PTM context information is exposed through Vendor > > Specific Extended Capability (VSEC) registers on supported controller > > implementation. > > > +const struct pcie_ptm_ops dw_pcie_ptm_ops = { > > Sparse complains: > > CHECK drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-debugfs.c > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-debugfs.c:868:27: warning: symbol 'dw_pcie_ptm_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? > > I should have noticed this earlier, sorry. As of v6.16-rc1, this is > now 852a1fdd34a8 ("PCI: dwc: Add debugfs support for PTM context") > upstream. Keeping this warm so we remember to fix it eventually.