From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
galshalom@nvidia.com, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, maorg@nvidia.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
tdave@nvidia.com, Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe switches
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 13:29:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250701132905.67d29191.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3-v1-74184c5043c6+195-pcie_switch_groups_jgg@nvidia.com>
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 19:28:33 -0300
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index d265de874b14b6..f4584ffacbc03d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,16 @@ struct iommu_group {
> struct list_head entry;
> unsigned int owner_cnt;
> void *owner;
> +
> + /* Used by the device_group() callbacks */
> + u32 bus_data;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Everything downstream of this group should share it.
> + */
> +#define BUS_DATA_PCI_UNISOLATED BIT(0)
NON_ISOLATED for consistency w/ enum from the previous patch?
...
> +struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> + struct iommu_group *group;
> + struct pci_dev *real_pdev;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!dev_is_pci(dev)))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + /*
> + * Arches can supply a completely different PCI device that actually
> + * does DMA.
> + */
> + real_pdev = pci_real_dma_dev(pdev);
> + if (real_pdev != pdev) {
> + group = iommu_group_get(&real_pdev->dev);
> + if (!group) {
> + /*
> + * The real_pdev has not had an iommu probed to it. We
> + * can't create a new group here because there is no way
> + * for pci_device_group(real_pdev) to pick it up.
> + */
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "PCI device is probing out of order, real device of %s is not probed yet\n",
> + pci_name(real_pdev));
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + }
> + return group;
> + }
> +
> + if (pdev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_BRIDGE_XLATE_ROOT)
> + return iommu_group_alloc();
> +
> + /* Anything upstream of this enforcing non-isolated? */
> + group = pci_hierarchy_group(pdev);
> if (group)
> return group;
>
> - /* No shared group found, allocate new */
> - return iommu_group_alloc();
> + switch (pci_bus_isolated(pdev->bus)) {
> + case PCIE_ISOLATED:
> + /* Check multi-function groups and same-bus devfn aliases */
> + group = pci_get_alias_group(pdev);
> + if (group)
> + return group;
> +
> + /* No shared group found, allocate new */
> + return iommu_group_alloc();
I'm not following how we'd handle a multi-function root port w/o
consistent ACS isolation here. How/where does the resulting group get
the UNISOLATED flag set?
I think that's necessary for the look-back in pci_hierarchy_group(),
right? Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-30 22:28 [PATCH 00/11] Fix incorrect iommu_groups with PCIe switches Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] PCI: Move REQ_ACS_FLAGS into pci_regs.h as PCI_ACS_ISOLATED Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] PCI: Add pci_bus_isolation() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-01 19:28 ` Alex Williamson
2025-07-02 1:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-03 15:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-03 22:17 ` Alex Williamson
2025-07-03 23:08 ` Alex Williamson
2025-07-03 23:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-03 23:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe switches Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-01 19:29 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2025-07-02 1:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 19:25 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-17 20:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-18 2:31 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 13:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] iommu: Organize iommu_group by member size Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 05/11] PCI: Add pci_reachable_set() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 06/11] iommu: Use pci_reachable_set() in pci_device_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 07/11] iommu: Validate that pci_for_each_dma_alias() matches the groups Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] PCI: Add the ACS Enhanced Capability definitions Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 09/11] PCI: Enable ACS Enhanced bits for enable_acs and config_acs Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 10/11] PCI: Check ACS DSP/USP redirect bits in pci_enable_pasid() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-30 22:28 ` [PATCH 11/11] PCI: Check ACS Extended flags for pci_bus_isolated() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-01 21:48 ` [PATCH 00/11] Fix incorrect iommu_groups with PCIe switches Alex Williamson
2025-07-02 1:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 0:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-11 14:55 ` Alex Williamson
2025-07-11 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-08 20:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-11 15:40 ` Alex Williamson
2025-07-11 16:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250701132905.67d29191.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=galshalom@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
--cc=tony.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).