From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@perex.cz>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:INTEL IOMMU (VT-d)" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:VFIO DRIVER" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:SOUND" <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>,
"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] PCI: Add a new 'boot_display' attribute
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 20:59:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250722015934.GA2763711@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <860bcc59-f0d0-4c8d-865c-89127c213cdf@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 07:28:07PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 7/21/25 6:00 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 12:44:11PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > On 7/18/2025 12:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 12:29:05PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > > > On 7/18/2025 12:25 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 12:38:12PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > > > > > From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On systems with multiple GPUs there can be uncertainty which GPU is the
> > > > > > > primary one used to drive the display at bootup. In some desktop
> > > > > > > environments this can lead to increased power consumption because
> > > > > > > secondary GPUs may be used for rendering and never go to a low power
> > > > > > > state. In order to disambiguate this add a new sysfs attribute
> > > > > > > 'boot_display' that uses the output of video_is_primary_device() to
> > > > > > > populate whether a PCI device was used for driving the display.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +What: /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../boot_display
> > > > > > > +Date: October 2025
> > > > > > > +Contact: Linux PCI developers <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
> > > > > > > +Description:
> > > > > > > + This file indicates that displays connected to the device were
> > > > > > > + used to display the boot sequence. If a display connected to
> > > > > > > + the device was used to display the boot sequence the file will
> > > > > > > + be present and contain "1".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > int __must_check pci_create_sysfs_dev_files(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > + int retval;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > if (!sysfs_initialized)
> > > > > > > return -EACCES;
> > > > > > > + retval = pci_create_boot_display_file(pdev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In addition to Mani's question about whether /sys/bus/pci/ is
> > > > > > the right place for this (which is a very good question), it's
> > > > > > also been pointed out to me that we've been trying to get rid
> > > > > > of pci_create_sysfs_dev_files() for years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If it's possible to make this a static attribute that would be
> > > > > > much, much cleaner.
> > > > >
> > > > > Right - I tried to do this, but the problem is at the time the
> > > > > PCI device is created the information needed to make the
> > > > > judgement isn't ready. The options end up being:
> > > > > * a sysfs file for every display device with 0/1
> > > > > * a sysfs file that is not accurate until later in the boot
> > > >
> > > > What's missing? The specifics might be helpful if someone has
> > > > another crack at getting rid of pci_create_sysfs_dev_files() in
> > > > the future.
> > >
> > > The underlying SCREEN_INFO code tries to walk through all the PCI
> > > devices in a loop, but at the time all the devices are walked the
> > > memory regions associated with the device weren't populated.
> >
> > Which loop are you referring to that walks through all the PCI
> > devices? I see this:
> >
> > efifb_set_system
> > for_each_pci_dev(dev)
> >
> > but that only looks at VGA devices and IIUC you also want to look at
> > non-VGA GPUs.
[I assume the loop is the "while (pdev =
pci_get_base_class(PCI_BASE_CLASS_DISPLAY))" in
__screen_info_pci_dev(), which indeed walks through all known PCI
devices]
> > I don't see a loop in *this* series, where the screen_info path looks
> > like this:
> >
> > pci_create_boot_display_file
> > video_is_primary_device
> > screen_info_pci_dev # added by "fbcon: Use screen info to find primary device"
> > screen_info_resources
> > __screen_info_pci_dev
> >
> > and we're basically matching the screen_info base/address with BAR
> > values.
> >
> > The usual problem is that BARs may not have been assigned by the
> > time pci_device_add() -> device_add() creates the static
> > attributes.
> >
> > So we call pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources() to assign
> > all the BARs. Then we call pci_create_sysfs_dev_files(), where
> > pci_create_resource_files() creates a "resource%d" file for each
> > BAR.
> >
> > But since we're trying to find the GPU that was used by BIOS, I
> > assume its BARs were programmed by BIOS and we shouldn't have to
> > wait until after pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources().
>
> Yes it was screen_info_pci_dev() and __screen_info_pci_dev(). The
> resources weren't ready on the first call into
> __screen_info_pci_dev().
>
> That's why the attribute needed to be created later.
I don't understand this. IIUC, screen_info contains addresses
programmed by BIOS. If we want to use that to match with a PCI
device, we have to compare with the BAR contents *before* Linux does
any assignments of its own.
So the only thing this should depend on is the BAR value at BIOS ->
Linux handoff, which we know at the time of device_add(), and we
should be able to do something like this:
bool pci_video_is_primary_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct screen_info *si = &screen_info;
struct resource res[SCREEN_INFO_MAX_RESOURCES];
ssize_t i, numres;
numres = screen_info_resources(si, res, ARRAY_SIZE(res));
...
for (i = 0; i < numres; ++i) {
if (pci_find_resource(pdev, &res[i]))
return true;
}
return false;
}
static umode_t pci_dev_boot_display_is_visible(...)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
if (pci_video_is_primary_device(pdev))
return a->mode;
return 0;
}
We should be able to check each BAR of each device in this path, with
no loop through the devices at all:
pci_device_add
device_add
device_add_attrs
device_add_groups
...
create_files
grp->is_visible()
pci_dev_boot_display_is_visible
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-17 17:38 [PATCH v9 0/9] Adjust fbcon console device detection Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] PCI: Add helper for checking if a PCI device is a display controller Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] vfio/pci: Use pci_is_display() Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] vga_switcheroo: " Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] iommu/vt-d: " Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] ALSA: hda: " Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] Fix access to video_is_primary_device() when compiled without CONFIG_VIDEO Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] PCI/VGA: Replace vga_is_firmware_default() with a screen info check Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] fbcon: Use screen info to find primary device Mario Limonciello
2025-07-22 14:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-22 14:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-07-22 15:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-22 15:39 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 17:38 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] PCI: Add a new 'boot_display' attribute Mario Limonciello
2025-07-18 17:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-18 17:29 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-07-18 17:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-18 17:44 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-07-20 6:05 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-07-21 23:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-22 0:28 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-07-22 1:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-07-22 4:01 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-07-17 20:56 ` [PATCH v9 0/9] Adjust fbcon console device detection Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-24 18:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-24 18:41 ` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250722015934.GA2763711@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=ddadap@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox