linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	galshalom@nvidia.com, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, maorg@nvidia.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	tdave@nvidia.com, Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/16] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe MFDs
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:58:57 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250728135857.GC36037@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5051c509-75a3-4ab6-bcfb-4610a660a142@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:47:44AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > +	for_each_set_bit(devfn, devfns.devfns, NR_DEVFNS) {
> > +		struct iommu_group *group;
> > +		struct pci_dev *pdev_slot;
> > +
> > +		pdev_slot = pci_get_slot(pdev->bus, devfn);
> > +		group = iommu_group_get(&pdev_slot->dev);
> > +		pci_dev_put(pdev_slot);
> > +		if (group) {
> > +			if (WARN_ON(!(group->bus_data &
> > +				      BUS_DATA_PCI_NON_ISOLATED)))
> > +				group->bus_data |= BUS_DATA_PCI_NON_ISOLATED;
> > +			return group;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	return pci_group_alloc_non_isolated();
> >   }
> >   static struct iommu_group *pci_hierarchy_group(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
> 
> I am seeing this WARN_ON when creating VFs of a CX-7 adapter :
> 
> [   31.436294] pci 0000:b1:00.2: enabling Extended Tags
> [   31.448767] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   31.453392] WARNING: CPU: 47 PID: 1673 at drivers/iommu/iommu.c:1533 pci_device_group+0x307/0x3b0
> ....

Ah, yeah, it thinks the SRIOV VFs are part of the MFD because they
match the slot. I guess the old code had this same issue but it was
more harmless.

>  *IOMMU Group 11 :
> 	b1:00.0 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT2910 Family [ConnectX-7]
> 	b1:00.2 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies ConnectX Family mlx5Gen Virtual Function
> 	b1:00.3 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies ConnectX Family mlx5Gen Virtual Function
> 	b1:00.4 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies ConnectX Family mlx5Gen Virtual Function
> 	b1:00.5 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies ConnectX Family mlx5Gen Virtual Function
> 	b1:00.6 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies ConnectX Family mlx5Gen Virtual Function
> 	b1:00.7 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies ConnectX Family mlx5Gen Virtual Function

This are all on the MFD's slot slot..

>  *IOMMU Group 12 :
> 	b1:00.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT2910 Family [ConnectX-7]

The one is basically what triggered the WARN_ON, it was done before
SRIOV "changed" the slot.

>  *IOMMU Group 184 :
> 	b1:01.0 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies ConnectX Family mlx5Gen Virtual Function
>  *IOMMU Group 185 :
> 	b1:01.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies ConnectX Family mlx5Gen Virtual Function

These two are on another slot so they no longer matched

It should be fixed by ignoring VFs when doing MFD matching.

> Other differences are on the onboard graphic card:
> 
>  *IOMMU Group 26 :
> 	02:00.0 PCI bridge: PLDA PCI Express Bridge (rev 02)
> 	03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Electronics Systems Ltd. Integrated Matrox G200eW3 Graphics Controller (rev 04)
> 
> becomes :
> 
>  *IOMMU Group 26 :
> 	02:00.0 PCI bridge: PLDA PCI Express Bridge (rev 02)
>  *IOMMU Group 27 :
> 	03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Electronics Systems Ltd. Integrated Matrox G200eW3 Graphics Controller (rev 04)

Yes, this is a deliberate improvement. PCIe to PCI bridges like this
do keep the bridge isolated from the VGA. Only the downstream PCI
devices alias with each other and are non-isolated.

Thanks,
Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-28 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-09 14:52 [PATCH v2 00/16] Fix incorrect iommu_groups with PCIe ACS Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] PCI: Move REQ_ACS_FLAGS into pci_regs.h as PCI_ACS_ISOLATED Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] PCI: Add pci_bus_isolation() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe switches Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 22:03   ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 18:09     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-18 19:00       ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 20:19         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-18 21:41           ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 22:52             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] iommu: Organize iommu_group by member size Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] PCI: Add pci_reachable_set() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 22:04   ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 17:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-18 19:10       ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] PCI: Remove duplication in calling pci_acs_ctrl_enabled() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] PCI: Use pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs() for pci_quirk_amd_sb_acs() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] PCI: Use pci_acs_ctrl_isolated() for pci_quirk_al_acs() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] PCI: Widen the acs_flags to u32 within the quirk callback Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] PCI: Add pci_mfd_isolation() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-20 17:21   ` Keith Busch
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe MFDs Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-28  9:47   ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-07-28 13:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] iommu: Validate that pci_for_each_dma_alias() matches the groups Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 22:07   ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] PCI: Add the ACS Enhanced Capability definitions Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] PCI: Enable ACS Enhanced bits for enable_acs and config_acs Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] PCI: Check ACS DSP/USP redirect bits in pci_enable_pasid() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 22:17   ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 17:52     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05  4:39   ` Askar Safin
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] PCI: Check ACS Extended flags for pci_bus_isolated() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-18 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] Fix incorrect iommu_groups with PCIe ACS Alex Williamson
2025-07-18 22:59   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-02  1:45 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-02 15:18   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05  3:43     ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-05 12:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 14:41         ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-05 14:43           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-06  2:22             ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-06  2:41               ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-06 13:40                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-07  1:36                 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-08  7:56                 ` Ethan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250728135857.GC36037@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=galshalom@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tony.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).