From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Christian Zigotzky" <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"mad skateman" <madskateman@gmail.com>,
"R.T.Dickinson" <rtd2@xtra.co.nz>,
"Christian Zigotzky" <info@xenosoft.de>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
hypexed@yahoo.com.au, "Darren Stevens" <darren@stevens-zone.net>,
"debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org"
<debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PPC] Boot problems after the pci-v6.18-changes
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:13:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251015101304.3ec03e6b@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <iv63quznjowwaib5pispl47gibevmmbbhl67ow2abl6s7lziuw@23koanb5uy22>
Hi All,
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 08:11:42 -0700
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 07:25:26AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > [cc += Mani]
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 07:12:49AM +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > > On 09 October 2025 at 07:37 am, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 06:54:58AM +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > > > > On 08 October 2025 at 09:51 pm, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 06:35:42PM +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > > > > > > Our PPC boards [1] have boot problems since the pci-v6.18-changes. [2]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Without the pci-v6.18-changes, the PPC boards boot without any problems.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Boot log with error messages:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/user-attachments/files/22782016/Kernel_6.18_with_PCI_changes.log
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Further information: https://github.com/chzigotzky/kernels/issues/17
> > > > > > Do you happen to have a similar log from a recent working kernel,
> > > > > > e.g., v6.17, that we could compare with?
> > > > > Thanks for your answer. Here is a similar log from the kernel 6.17.0:
> > > > > https://github.com/user-attachments/files/22789946/Kernel_6.17.0_Cyrus_Plus_board_P5040.log
> > > > These lines are added in v6.18:
> > > >
> > > > pci 0000:01:00.0: ASPM: DT platform, enabling L0s-up L0s-dw L1 ASPM-L1.1 ASPM-L1.2 PCI-PM-L1.1 PCI-PM-L1.2
> > > > pci 0000:01:00.0: ASPM: DT platform, enabling ClockPM
> > > > pci 0001:01:00.0: ASPM: DT platform, enabling L0s-up L0s-dw L1 ASPM-L1.1 ASPM-L1.2 PCI-PM-L1.1 PCI-PM-L1.2
> > > > pci 0001:01:00.0: ASPM: DT platform, enabling ClockPM
> > > > pci 0001:03:00.0: ASPM: DT platform, enabling L0s-up L0s-dw L1 ASPM-L1.1 ASPM-L1.2 PCI-PM-L1.1 PCI-PM-L1.2
> > > > pci 0001:03:00.0: ASPM: DT platform, enabling ClockPM
> > > >
> > > > Possible candidate:
> > > >
> > > > f3ac2ff14834 ("PCI/ASPM: Enable all ClockPM and ASPM states for devicetree platforms")
> > >
> > > After reverting the commit f3ac2ff14834, the kernel boots without any
> > > problems.
> > >
> > > f3ac2ff14834 ("PCI/ASPM: Enable all ClockPM and ASPM states for devicetree
> > > platforms") is the bad commit.
> >
> > Hi Mani, your commit f3ac2ff14834 is causing a regression on certain
> > powerpc machines. Any ideas?
> >
>
> Hi Lukas,
>
> Thanks for looping me in. The referenced commit forcefully enables ASPM on all
> DT platforms as we decided to bite the bullet finally.
>
> Looks like the device (0000:01:00.0) doesn't play nice with ASPM even though it
> advertises ASPM capability.
>
> Christian, could you please test the below change and see if it fixes the issue?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index 214ed060ca1b..e006b0560b39 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -2525,6 +2525,15 @@ static void quirk_disable_aspm_l0s_l1(struct pci_dev *dev)
> */
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASMEDIA, 0x1080, quirk_disable_aspm_l0s_l1);
>
> +
> +static void quirk_disable_aspm_all(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + pci_info(dev, "Disabling ASPM\n");
> + pci_disable_link_state(dev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_ALL);
> +}
> +
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6738, quirk_disable_aspm_all);
> +
> /*
> * Some Pericom PCIe-to-PCI bridges in reverse mode need the PCIe Retrain
> * Link bit cleared after starting the link retrain process to allow this
>
>
> Going forward, we should be quirking the devices if they behave erratically.
>
> - Mani
>
I also observed issues with the commit f3ac2ff14834 ("PCI/ASPM: Enable all
ClockPM and ASPM states for devicetree platforms")
My system is an ARM board (Marvel Armada 3720 DDB)
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.1/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-3720-db.dts
I use an LAN966x PCI board
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.1/source/drivers/misc/lan966x_pci.c
Usually, when I did a ping using the PCI board, I have more or less the
following timings:
# ping 192.168.32.100
PING 192.168.32.100 (192.168.32.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.32.100: seq=0 ttl=64 time=3.328 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.32.100: seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.636 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.32.100: seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.928 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.32.100: seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.649 ms
But with a vanilla v6.18-rc1 kernel, those timings become awful:
# ping 192.168.32.100
PING 192.168.32.100 (192.168.32.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.32.100: seq=0 ttl=64 time=656.634 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.32.100: seq=1 ttl=64 time=551.812 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.32.100: seq=2 ttl=64 time=702.966 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.32.100: seq=3 ttl=64 time=725.904 ms
Reverting commit f3ac2ff14834 ("PCI/ASPM: Enable all ClockPM and ASPM states
for devicetree platforms") fixes my timing issues.
Also tried the quirk proposed in this discussion (quirk_disable_aspm_all)
an the quirk also fixes the timing issue.
I used the same PCI board on an x86 system and no timing issues were
observed.
I am not sure the quirk_disable_aspm_all quirk is the solution. Indeed,
the issue could be at the PCIe controller level and not the PCIe device.
What should be the best solution ?
Is something missing on device-tree based systems to have the commit
f3ac2ff14834 applied without regressions ?
Best regards,
Hervé
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3eedbe78-1fbd-4763-a7f3-ac5665e76a4a@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <15731ad7-83ff-c7ef-e4a1-8b11814572c2@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <17e37b22-5839-0e3a-0dbf-9c676adb0dec@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <3b210c92-4be6-ce49-7512-bb194475eeab@xenosoft.de>
2021-11-09 15:10 ` [PASEMI] Nemo board doesn't recognize any ATA disks with the pci-v5.16 updates Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-09 16:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-09 22:40 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-09 23:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-09 23:18 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-10 16:42 ` Robert Święcki
2021-11-10 3:52 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-11-10 18:07 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-10 18:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-10 19:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-11 5:24 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-11 7:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-11 7:47 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-11 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-11 10:44 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-11 11:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-11 11:54 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-11 22:21 ` Olof Johansson
2021-11-12 11:49 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-11-11 17:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-12 9:40 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-12 10:11 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-12 11:00 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-12 13:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-12 14:15 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-12 14:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-12 15:01 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-11-12 15:05 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-08 16:35 ` [PPC] Boot problems after the pci-v6.18-changes Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-08 16:40 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-10-08 16:47 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-08 19:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-09 4:54 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-09 5:37 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-11 5:12 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-11 5:25 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-11 15:11 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-11 19:34 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-12 7:47 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-12 8:26 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-13 4:46 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-13 5:02 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-13 5:23 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-13 14:50 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-13 15:02 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-13 15:38 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-13 15:58 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
[not found] ` <a2ee06b1-28a5-4cb1-9940-b225f9e6d6ee@xenosoft.de>
2025-10-14 4:55 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-15 6:41 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-13 16:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-15 8:13 ` Herve Codina [this message]
2025-10-15 11:30 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-15 11:58 ` Herve Codina
2025-10-15 12:27 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-15 12:59 ` Herve Codina
[not found] ` <76026544-3472-4953-910A-376DD42BC6D0@xenosoft.de>
2025-10-15 13:17 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-15 13:34 ` Herve Codina
2025-10-15 16:54 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-15 17:15 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-16 3:28 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-16 7:36 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-16 7:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-16 10:44 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-17 5:35 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-15 16:23 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-15 13:07 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-15 12:50 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-23 7:38 ` Herve Codina
2025-10-23 8:49 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-10-23 9:19 ` Herve Codina
2025-10-23 16:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-15 23:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-13 21:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-14 18:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-30 22:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-01 5:39 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-11-01 7:59 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-11-01 17:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-03 18:28 ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-11-05 22:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-06 8:48 ` Hongxing Zhu
2025-11-06 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-07 2:26 ` Hongxing Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251015101304.3ec03e6b@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
--cc=darren@stevens-zone.net \
--cc=debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=hypexed@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=info@xenosoft.de \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=madskateman@gmail.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rtd2@xtra.co.nz \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).