* [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation
@ 2025-10-24 22:46 Dan Williams
2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms Dan Williams
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2025-10-24 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bhelgaas
Cc: linux-pci, jonathan.derrick, lpieralisi, kwilczynski, mani, robh,
Dexuan Cui, Haiyang Zhang, K. Y. Srinivasan,
Manivannan Sadhasivam, Michael Kelley, Nirmal Patel,
Suzuki K Poulose, Szymon Durawa, Wei Liu
Changes since v1 [1]:
- Rebase on v6.18-rc2
- Support callers supplying both a hint and a range for the Hyper-V hint
+ fallback case (Michael)
- Add comment explaining domain number 0 vs Gen1 VMs, and domain values
greater than U16_MAX concerns (Michael)
- Leave the VMD status quo comment about requesting domain numbers >
U16_MAX
[1]: http://lore.kernel.org/20250716160835.680486-1-dan.j.williams@intel.com
The PCI/TSM effort created a sample driver to test ABI flows
(samples/devsec/ [2]). Suzuki observed that it only worked on x86 due to
its dependency on CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=n. I.e. an unfortunate
restriction for what should be an architecture agnostic test framework.
Introduce a new pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() helper that all "soft"
host-bridge drivers can share and hide the CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
details behind that helper.
[2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/devsec/tsm.git/commit/?id=0e16ce0b9c64
Dan Williams (2):
PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms
PCI: vmd: Switch to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr()
include/linux/pci.h | 7 ++++
drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 62 +++++------------------------
drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 40 ++++++++-----------
drivers/pci/pci.c | 24 ++++++++++-
drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 +++-
5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
base-commit: 211ddde0823f1442e4ad052a2f30f050145ccada
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms 2025-10-24 22:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation Dan Williams @ 2025-10-24 22:46 ` Dan Williams 2025-10-25 19:53 ` Michael Kelley 2025-10-27 20:08 ` Dave Jiang 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: vmd: Switch to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() Dan Williams 2025-10-28 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation Bjorn Helgaas 2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Dan Williams @ 2025-10-24 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bhelgaas Cc: linux-pci, jonathan.derrick, lpieralisi, kwilczynski, mani, robh, Suzuki K Poulose, Manivannan Sadhasivam, K. Y. Srinivasan, Haiyang Zhang, Wei Liu, Dexuan Cui, Michael Kelley The ability to emulate a host bridge is useful not only for hardware PCI controllers like CONFIG_VMD, or virtual PCI controllers like CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV, but also for test and development scenarios like CONFIG_SAMPLES_DEVSEC [1]. One stumbling block for defining CONFIG_SAMPLES_DEVSEC, a sample implementation of a platform TSM for PCI Device Security, is the need to accommodate PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC architectures alongside x86 [2]. In support of supplementing the existing CONFIG_PCI_BRIDGE_EMUL infrastructure for host bridges: * Introduce pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() as a common way to find a free PCI domain number whether that is to reuse the existing dynamic allocation code in the !ACPI case, or to assign an unused domain above the last ACPI segment. * Convert pci-hyperv to the new allocator so that the PCI core can unconditionally assume that bridge->domain_nr != PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET is the dynamically allocated case. A follow on patch can also convert vmd to the new scheme. Currently vmd is limited to CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=n (x86) so, unlike pci-hyperv, it does not immediately conflict with this new pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() mechanism. Link: http://lore.kernel.org/174107249038.1288555.12362100502109498455.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com [1] Reported-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/20250311144601.145736-3-suzuki.poulose@arm.com Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> [michael: maintain compatibility with userspace that expects 16-bit ids] Cc: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> --- include/linux/pci.h | 7 ++++ drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 62 +++++------------------------ drivers/pci/pci.c | 24 ++++++++++- drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 +++- 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index d1fdf81fbe1e..1ef1535802b0 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -1956,10 +1956,17 @@ DEFINE_GUARD(pci_dev, struct pci_dev *, pci_dev_lock(_T), pci_dev_unlock(_T)) */ #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS extern int pci_domains_supported; +int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max); +void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr); #else enum { pci_domains_supported = 0 }; static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; } static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; } +static inline int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max) +{ + return 0; +} +static inline void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr) { } #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ /* diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c index 146b43981b27..64f68efaf547 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c @@ -3696,48 +3696,6 @@ static int hv_send_resources_released(struct hv_device *hdev) return 0; } -#define HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE (64 * 1024) -static DECLARE_BITMAP(hvpci_dom_map, HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE); - -/* - * PCI domain number 0 is used by emulated devices on Gen1 VMs, so define 0 - * as invalid for passthrough PCI devices of this driver. - */ -#define HVPCI_DOM_INVALID 0 - -/** - * hv_get_dom_num() - Get a valid PCI domain number - * Check if the PCI domain number is in use, and return another number if - * it is in use. - * - * @dom: Requested domain number - * - * return: domain number on success, HVPCI_DOM_INVALID on failure - */ -static u16 hv_get_dom_num(u16 dom) -{ - unsigned int i; - - if (test_and_set_bit(dom, hvpci_dom_map) == 0) - return dom; - - for_each_clear_bit(i, hvpci_dom_map, HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE) { - if (test_and_set_bit(i, hvpci_dom_map) == 0) - return i; - } - - return HVPCI_DOM_INVALID; -} - -/** - * hv_put_dom_num() - Mark the PCI domain number as free - * @dom: Domain number to be freed - */ -static void hv_put_dom_num(u16 dom) -{ - clear_bit(dom, hvpci_dom_map); -} - /** * hv_pci_probe() - New VMBus channel probe, for a root PCI bus * @hdev: VMBus's tracking struct for this root PCI bus @@ -3750,9 +3708,9 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, { struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus; - u16 dom_req, dom; + int ret, dom; + u16 dom_req; char *name; - int ret; bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(&hdev->device, 0); if (!bridge) @@ -3779,11 +3737,14 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, * PCI bus (which is actually emulated by the hypervisor) is domain 0. * (2) There will be no overlap between domains (after fixing possible * collisions) in the same VM. + * + * Because Gen1 VMs use domain 0, don't allow picking domain 0 here, + * even if bytes 4 and 5 of the instance GUID are both zero. For wider + * userspace compatibility, limit the domain id to a 16-bit value. */ dom_req = hdev->dev_instance.b[5] << 8 | hdev->dev_instance.b[4]; - dom = hv_get_dom_num(dom_req); - - if (dom == HVPCI_DOM_INVALID) { + dom = pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(dom_req, 1, U16_MAX); + if (dom < 0) { dev_err(&hdev->device, "Unable to use dom# 0x%x or other numbers", dom_req); ret = -EINVAL; @@ -3917,7 +3878,7 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, destroy_wq: destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq); free_dom: - hv_put_dom_num(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); free_bus: kfree(hbus); return ret; @@ -4042,8 +4003,6 @@ static void hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev) irq_domain_remove(hbus->irq_domain); irq_domain_free_fwnode(hbus->fwnode); - hv_put_dom_num(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); - kfree(hbus); } @@ -4217,9 +4176,6 @@ static int __init init_hv_pci_drv(void) if (ret) return ret; - /* Set the invalid domain number's bit, so it will not be used */ - set_bit(HVPCI_DOM_INVALID, hvpci_dom_map); - /* Initialize PCI block r/w interface */ hvpci_block_ops.read_block = hv_read_config_block; hvpci_block_ops.write_block = hv_write_config_block; diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index b14dd064006c..64aed8705e91 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c @@ -6656,9 +6656,31 @@ static void pci_no_domains(void) #endif } +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS +static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida); + +/** + * pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() - allocate a PCI domain number per constraints + * @hint: desired domain, 0 if any id in the range of @min to @max is acceptable + * @min: minimum allowable domain + * @max: maximum allowable domain, no ids higher than INT_MAX will be returned + */ +int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max) +{ + return ida_alloc_range(&pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida, max(hint, min), max, + GFP_KERNEL); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr); + +void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr) +{ + ida_free(&pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida, domain_nr); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr); +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_static_ida); -static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida); static void of_pci_reserve_static_domain_nr(void) { diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 0ce98e18b5a8..5e101ced00a5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -650,6 +650,11 @@ static void pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev) pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->windows); pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->dma_ranges); + + /* Host bridges only have domain_nr set in the emulation case */ + if (bridge->domain_nr != PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET) + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(bridge->domain_nr); + kfree(bridge); } @@ -1130,7 +1135,8 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) device_del(&bridge->dev); free: #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC - pci_bus_release_domain_nr(parent, bus->domain_nr); + if (bridge->domain_nr == PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET) + pci_bus_release_domain_nr(parent, bus->domain_nr); #endif if (bus_registered) put_device(&bus->dev); -- 2.51.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms Dan Williams @ 2025-10-25 19:53 ` Michael Kelley 2025-10-27 23:45 ` dan.j.williams 2025-10-27 20:08 ` Dave Jiang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Michael Kelley @ 2025-10-25 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Williams, bhelgaas@google.com Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jonathan.derrick@linux.dev, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose, Manivannan Sadhasivam, K. Y. Srinivasan, Haiyang Zhang, Wei Liu, Dexuan Cui From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2025 3:46 PM > > The ability to emulate a host bridge is useful not only for hardware PCI > controllers like CONFIG_VMD, or virtual PCI controllers like > CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV, but also for test and development scenarios like > CONFIG_SAMPLES_DEVSEC [1]. > > One stumbling block for defining CONFIG_SAMPLES_DEVSEC, a sample > implementation of a platform TSM for PCI Device Security, is the need to > accommodate PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC architectures alongside x86 [2]. There's not a [2] tag anywhere below. Presumably it should be the "Closes:" link? > > In support of supplementing the existing CONFIG_PCI_BRIDGE_EMUL > infrastructure for host bridges: > > * Introduce pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() as a common way to find a free > PCI domain number whether that is to reuse the existing dynamic > allocation code in the !ACPI case, or to assign an unused domain above > the last ACPI segment. > > * Convert pci-hyperv to the new allocator so that the PCI core can > unconditionally assume that bridge->domain_nr != PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET > is the dynamically allocated case. > > A follow on patch can also convert vmd to the new scheme. Currently vmd > is limited to CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=n (x86) so, unlike pci-hyperv, > it does not immediately conflict with this new > pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() mechanism. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/174107249038.1288555.12362100502109498455.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com [1] > Reported-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250311144601.145736-3-suzuki.poulose@arm.com > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> > Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> > Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> > Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> > Tested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > [michael: maintain compatibility with userspace that expects 16-bit ids] Is the above line spurious? It doesn't seem to belong here. > Cc: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Tested on x86 and arm64 VMs in the Azure public cloud with multiple Hyper-V virtual PCI devices in each VM. So covered both the "CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=n" and "=y" cases. Did manual unbind/rebind of vPCI devices multiple times so the domain numbers would be freed and reallocated. All was good. I did not go to the trouble of simulating a domain number collision. Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> > --- > include/linux/pci.h | 7 ++++ > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 62 +++++------------------------ > drivers/pci/pci.c | 24 ++++++++++- > drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 +++- > 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index d1fdf81fbe1e..1ef1535802b0 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -1956,10 +1956,17 @@ DEFINE_GUARD(pci_dev, struct pci_dev *, pci_dev_lock(_T), pci_dev_unlock(_T)) > */ > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS > extern int pci_domains_supported; > +int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max); > +void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr); > #else > enum { pci_domains_supported = 0 }; > static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; } > static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; } > +static inline int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > +static inline void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr) { } > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ > > /* > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > index 146b43981b27..64f68efaf547 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > @@ -3696,48 +3696,6 @@ static int hv_send_resources_released(struct hv_device *hdev) > return 0; > } > > -#define HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE (64 * 1024) > -static DECLARE_BITMAP(hvpci_dom_map, HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE); > - > -/* > - * PCI domain number 0 is used by emulated devices on Gen1 VMs, so define 0 > - * as invalid for passthrough PCI devices of this driver. > - */ > -#define HVPCI_DOM_INVALID 0 > - > -/** > - * hv_get_dom_num() - Get a valid PCI domain number > - * Check if the PCI domain number is in use, and return another number if > - * it is in use. > - * > - * @dom: Requested domain number > - * > - * return: domain number on success, HVPCI_DOM_INVALID on failure > - */ > -static u16 hv_get_dom_num(u16 dom) > -{ > - unsigned int i; > - > - if (test_and_set_bit(dom, hvpci_dom_map) == 0) > - return dom; > - > - for_each_clear_bit(i, hvpci_dom_map, HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE) { > - if (test_and_set_bit(i, hvpci_dom_map) == 0) > - return i; > - } > - > - return HVPCI_DOM_INVALID; > -} > - > -/** > - * hv_put_dom_num() - Mark the PCI domain number as free > - * @dom: Domain number to be freed > - */ > -static void hv_put_dom_num(u16 dom) > -{ > - clear_bit(dom, hvpci_dom_map); > -} > - > /** > * hv_pci_probe() - New VMBus channel probe, for a root PCI bus > * @hdev: VMBus's tracking struct for this root PCI bus > @@ -3750,9 +3708,9 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, > { > struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus; > - u16 dom_req, dom; > + int ret, dom; > + u16 dom_req; > char *name; > - int ret; > > bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(&hdev->device, 0); > if (!bridge) > @@ -3779,11 +3737,14 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, > * PCI bus (which is actually emulated by the hypervisor) is domain 0. > * (2) There will be no overlap between domains (after fixing possible > * collisions) in the same VM. > + * > + * Because Gen1 VMs use domain 0, don't allow picking domain 0 here, > + * even if bytes 4 and 5 of the instance GUID are both zero. For wider > + * userspace compatibility, limit the domain id to a 16-bit value. > */ > dom_req = hdev->dev_instance.b[5] << 8 | hdev->dev_instance.b[4]; > - dom = hv_get_dom_num(dom_req); > - > - if (dom == HVPCI_DOM_INVALID) { > + dom = pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(dom_req, 1, U16_MAX); > + if (dom < 0) { > dev_err(&hdev->device, > "Unable to use dom# 0x%x or other numbers", dom_req); > ret = -EINVAL; > @@ -3917,7 +3878,7 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, > destroy_wq: > destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq); > free_dom: > - hv_put_dom_num(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); > + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); > free_bus: > kfree(hbus); > return ret; > @@ -4042,8 +4003,6 @@ static void hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev) > irq_domain_remove(hbus->irq_domain); > irq_domain_free_fwnode(hbus->fwnode); > > - hv_put_dom_num(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); > - > kfree(hbus); > } > > @@ -4217,9 +4176,6 @@ static int __init init_hv_pci_drv(void) > if (ret) > return ret; > > - /* Set the invalid domain number's bit, so it will not be used */ > - set_bit(HVPCI_DOM_INVALID, hvpci_dom_map); > - > /* Initialize PCI block r/w interface */ > hvpci_block_ops.read_block = hv_read_config_block; > hvpci_block_ops.write_block = hv_write_config_block; > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index b14dd064006c..64aed8705e91 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -6656,9 +6656,31 @@ static void pci_no_domains(void) > #endif > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS > +static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida); > + > +/** > + * pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() - allocate a PCI domain number per constraints > + * @hint: desired domain, 0 if any id in the range of @min to @max is acceptable > + * @min: minimum allowable domain > + * @max: maximum allowable domain, no ids higher than INT_MAX will be returned > + */ > +int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max) > +{ > + return ida_alloc_range(&pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida, max(hint, min), max, > + GFP_KERNEL); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr); > + > +void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr) > +{ > + ida_free(&pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida, domain_nr); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr); > +#endif > + > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_static_ida); > -static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida); > > static void of_pci_reserve_static_domain_nr(void) > { > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c > index 0ce98e18b5a8..5e101ced00a5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c > @@ -650,6 +650,11 @@ static void pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev) > > pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->windows); > pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->dma_ranges); > + > + /* Host bridges only have domain_nr set in the emulation case */ > + if (bridge->domain_nr != PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET) > + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(bridge->domain_nr); > + > kfree(bridge); > } > > @@ -1130,7 +1135,8 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > device_del(&bridge->dev); > free: > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > - pci_bus_release_domain_nr(parent, bus->domain_nr); > + if (bridge->domain_nr == PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET) > + pci_bus_release_domain_nr(parent, bus->domain_nr); > #endif > if (bus_registered) > put_device(&bus->dev); > -- > 2.51.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms 2025-10-25 19:53 ` Michael Kelley @ 2025-10-27 23:45 ` dan.j.williams 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: dan.j.williams @ 2025-10-27 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Kelley, Dan Williams, bhelgaas@google.com Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jonathan.derrick@linux.dev, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose, Manivannan Sadhasivam, K. Y. Srinivasan, Haiyang Zhang, Wei Liu, Dexuan Cui Michael Kelley wrote: > From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2025 3:46 PM > > > > The ability to emulate a host bridge is useful not only for hardware PCI > > controllers like CONFIG_VMD, or virtual PCI controllers like > > CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV, but also for test and development scenarios like > > CONFIG_SAMPLES_DEVSEC [1]. > > > > One stumbling block for defining CONFIG_SAMPLES_DEVSEC, a sample > > implementation of a platform TSM for PCI Device Security, is the need to > > accommodate PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC architectures alongside x86 [2]. > > There's not a [2] tag anywhere below. Presumably it should be the "Closes:" > link? Yes, good catch. > > In support of supplementing the existing CONFIG_PCI_BRIDGE_EMUL > > infrastructure for host bridges: > > > > * Introduce pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() as a common way to find a free > > PCI domain number whether that is to reuse the existing dynamic > > allocation code in the !ACPI case, or to assign an unused domain above > > the last ACPI segment. > > > > * Convert pci-hyperv to the new allocator so that the PCI core can > > unconditionally assume that bridge->domain_nr != PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET > > is the dynamically allocated case. > > > > A follow on patch can also convert vmd to the new scheme. Currently vmd > > is limited to CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=n (x86) so, unlike pci-hyperv, > > it does not immediately conflict with this new > > pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() mechanism. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/174107249038.1288555.12362100502109498455.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com [1] > > Reported-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250311144601.145736-3-suzuki.poulose@arm.com > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> > > Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> > > Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> > > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> > > Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> > > Tested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > > [michael: maintain compatibility with userspace that expects 16-bit ids] > > Is the above line spurious? It doesn't seem to belong here. That was documenting the change to make the @max argument to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() be U16_MAX in the Hyper-V case, but yeah no need to note that in this case. You did not edit the patch directly. I am ok if Bjorn deletes that on applying. If you want a respin Bjorn, let me know. > > Cc: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > Tested on x86 and arm64 VMs in the Azure public cloud with > multiple Hyper-V virtual PCI devices in each VM. So covered > both the "CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=n" and "=y" cases. > Did manual unbind/rebind of vPCI devices multiple times so the > domain numbers would be freed and reallocated. All was good. > I did not go to the trouble of simulating a domain number > collision. > > Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> > Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Thanks, Michael much appreciated! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms Dan Williams 2025-10-25 19:53 ` Michael Kelley @ 2025-10-27 20:08 ` Dave Jiang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Dave Jiang @ 2025-10-27 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Williams, bhelgaas Cc: linux-pci, jonathan.derrick, lpieralisi, kwilczynski, mani, robh, Suzuki K Poulose, Manivannan Sadhasivam, K. Y. Srinivasan, Haiyang Zhang, Wei Liu, Dexuan Cui, Michael Kelley On 10/24/25 3:46 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > The ability to emulate a host bridge is useful not only for hardware PCI > controllers like CONFIG_VMD, or virtual PCI controllers like > CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV, but also for test and development scenarios like > CONFIG_SAMPLES_DEVSEC [1]. > > One stumbling block for defining CONFIG_SAMPLES_DEVSEC, a sample > implementation of a platform TSM for PCI Device Security, is the need to > accommodate PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC architectures alongside x86 [2]. > > In support of supplementing the existing CONFIG_PCI_BRIDGE_EMUL > infrastructure for host bridges: > > * Introduce pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() as a common way to find a free > PCI domain number whether that is to reuse the existing dynamic > allocation code in the !ACPI case, or to assign an unused domain above > the last ACPI segment. > > * Convert pci-hyperv to the new allocator so that the PCI core can > unconditionally assume that bridge->domain_nr != PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET > is the dynamically allocated case. > > A follow on patch can also convert vmd to the new scheme. Currently vmd > is limited to CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=n (x86) so, unlike pci-hyperv, > it does not immediately conflict with this new > pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() mechanism. > > Link: http://lore.kernel.org/174107249038.1288555.12362100502109498455.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com [1] > Reported-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/20250311144601.145736-3-suzuki.poulose@arm.com > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> > Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> > Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> > Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> > Tested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > [michael: maintain compatibility with userspace that expects 16-bit ids] > Cc: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>> --- > include/linux/pci.h | 7 ++++ > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 62 +++++------------------------ > drivers/pci/pci.c | 24 ++++++++++- > drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 +++- > 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index d1fdf81fbe1e..1ef1535802b0 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -1956,10 +1956,17 @@ DEFINE_GUARD(pci_dev, struct pci_dev *, pci_dev_lock(_T), pci_dev_unlock(_T)) > */ > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS > extern int pci_domains_supported; > +int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max); > +void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr); > #else > enum { pci_domains_supported = 0 }; > static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; } > static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 0; } > +static inline int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > +static inline void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr) { } > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ > > /* > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > index 146b43981b27..64f68efaf547 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > @@ -3696,48 +3696,6 @@ static int hv_send_resources_released(struct hv_device *hdev) > return 0; > } > > -#define HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE (64 * 1024) > -static DECLARE_BITMAP(hvpci_dom_map, HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE); > - > -/* > - * PCI domain number 0 is used by emulated devices on Gen1 VMs, so define 0 > - * as invalid for passthrough PCI devices of this driver. > - */ > -#define HVPCI_DOM_INVALID 0 > - > -/** > - * hv_get_dom_num() - Get a valid PCI domain number > - * Check if the PCI domain number is in use, and return another number if > - * it is in use. > - * > - * @dom: Requested domain number > - * > - * return: domain number on success, HVPCI_DOM_INVALID on failure > - */ > -static u16 hv_get_dom_num(u16 dom) > -{ > - unsigned int i; > - > - if (test_and_set_bit(dom, hvpci_dom_map) == 0) > - return dom; > - > - for_each_clear_bit(i, hvpci_dom_map, HVPCI_DOM_MAP_SIZE) { > - if (test_and_set_bit(i, hvpci_dom_map) == 0) > - return i; > - } > - > - return HVPCI_DOM_INVALID; > -} > - > -/** > - * hv_put_dom_num() - Mark the PCI domain number as free > - * @dom: Domain number to be freed > - */ > -static void hv_put_dom_num(u16 dom) > -{ > - clear_bit(dom, hvpci_dom_map); > -} > - > /** > * hv_pci_probe() - New VMBus channel probe, for a root PCI bus > * @hdev: VMBus's tracking struct for this root PCI bus > @@ -3750,9 +3708,9 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, > { > struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus; > - u16 dom_req, dom; > + int ret, dom; > + u16 dom_req; > char *name; > - int ret; > > bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(&hdev->device, 0); > if (!bridge) > @@ -3779,11 +3737,14 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, > * PCI bus (which is actually emulated by the hypervisor) is domain 0. > * (2) There will be no overlap between domains (after fixing possible > * collisions) in the same VM. > + * > + * Because Gen1 VMs use domain 0, don't allow picking domain 0 here, > + * even if bytes 4 and 5 of the instance GUID are both zero. For wider > + * userspace compatibility, limit the domain id to a 16-bit value. > */ > dom_req = hdev->dev_instance.b[5] << 8 | hdev->dev_instance.b[4]; > - dom = hv_get_dom_num(dom_req); > - > - if (dom == HVPCI_DOM_INVALID) { > + dom = pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(dom_req, 1, U16_MAX); > + if (dom < 0) { > dev_err(&hdev->device, > "Unable to use dom# 0x%x or other numbers", dom_req); > ret = -EINVAL; > @@ -3917,7 +3878,7 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev, > destroy_wq: > destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq); > free_dom: > - hv_put_dom_num(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); > + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); > free_bus: > kfree(hbus); > return ret; > @@ -4042,8 +4003,6 @@ static void hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev) > irq_domain_remove(hbus->irq_domain); > irq_domain_free_fwnode(hbus->fwnode); > > - hv_put_dom_num(hbus->bridge->domain_nr); > - > kfree(hbus); > } > > @@ -4217,9 +4176,6 @@ static int __init init_hv_pci_drv(void) > if (ret) > return ret; > > - /* Set the invalid domain number's bit, so it will not be used */ > - set_bit(HVPCI_DOM_INVALID, hvpci_dom_map); > - > /* Initialize PCI block r/w interface */ > hvpci_block_ops.read_block = hv_read_config_block; > hvpci_block_ops.write_block = hv_write_config_block; > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index b14dd064006c..64aed8705e91 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -6656,9 +6656,31 @@ static void pci_no_domains(void) > #endif > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS > +static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida); > + > +/** > + * pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() - allocate a PCI domain number per constraints > + * @hint: desired domain, 0 if any id in the range of @min to @max is acceptable > + * @min: minimum allowable domain > + * @max: maximum allowable domain, no ids higher than INT_MAX will be returned > + */ > +int pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(u32 hint, u32 min, u32 max) > +{ > + return ida_alloc_range(&pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida, max(hint, min), max, > + GFP_KERNEL); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr); > + > +void pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(int domain_nr) > +{ > + ida_free(&pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida, domain_nr); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr); > +#endif > + > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_static_ida); > -static DEFINE_IDA(pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida); > > static void of_pci_reserve_static_domain_nr(void) > { > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c > index 0ce98e18b5a8..5e101ced00a5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c > @@ -650,6 +650,11 @@ static void pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev) > > pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->windows); > pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->dma_ranges); > + > + /* Host bridges only have domain_nr set in the emulation case */ > + if (bridge->domain_nr != PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET) > + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(bridge->domain_nr); > + > kfree(bridge); > } > > @@ -1130,7 +1135,8 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > device_del(&bridge->dev); > free: > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > - pci_bus_release_domain_nr(parent, bus->domain_nr); > + if (bridge->domain_nr == PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET) > + pci_bus_release_domain_nr(parent, bus->domain_nr); > #endif > if (bus_registered) > put_device(&bus->dev); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: vmd: Switch to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() 2025-10-24 22:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation Dan Williams 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms Dan Williams @ 2025-10-24 22:46 ` Dan Williams 2025-10-27 20:08 ` Dave Jiang 2025-10-28 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation Bjorn Helgaas 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Dan Williams @ 2025-10-24 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bhelgaas Cc: linux-pci, jonathan.derrick, lpieralisi, kwilczynski, mani, robh, Szymon Durawa, Nirmal Patel The new common domain number allocator can replace the custom allocator in VMD. Beyond some code reuse benefits it does close a potential race whereby vmd_find_free_domain() collides with new PCI buses coming online with a conflicting domain number. Such a race has not been observed in practice, hence not tagging this change as a fix. As VMD uses pci_create_root_bus() rather than pci_alloc_host_bridge() + pci_scan_root_bus_bridge() it has no chance to set ->domain_nr in the bridge so needs to manage freeing the domain number on its own. Cc: Szymon Durawa <szymon.durawa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 40 +++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c index b4b62b9ccc45..03b5920138f0 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c @@ -578,22 +578,6 @@ static void vmd_detach_resources(struct vmd_dev *vmd) vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR2].child = NULL; } -/* - * VMD domains start at 0x10000 to not clash with ACPI _SEG domains. - * Per ACPI r6.0, sec 6.5.6, _SEG returns an integer, of which the lower - * 16 bits are the PCI Segment Group (domain) number. Other bits are - * currently reserved. - */ -static int vmd_find_free_domain(void) -{ - int domain = 0xffff; - struct pci_bus *bus = NULL; - - while ((bus = pci_find_next_bus(bus)) != NULL) - domain = max_t(int, domain, pci_domain_nr(bus)); - return domain + 1; -} - static int vmd_get_phys_offsets(struct vmd_dev *vmd, bool native_hint, resource_size_t *offset1, resource_size_t *offset2) @@ -878,13 +862,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features) .parent = res, }; - sd->vmd_dev = vmd->dev; - sd->domain = vmd_find_free_domain(); - if (sd->domain < 0) - return sd->domain; - - sd->node = pcibus_to_node(vmd->dev->bus); - /* * Currently MSI remapping must be enabled in guest passthrough mode * due to some missing interrupt remapping plumbing. This is probably @@ -910,9 +887,24 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features) pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &vmd->resources[1], offset[0]); pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &vmd->resources[2], offset[1]); + sd->vmd_dev = vmd->dev; + + /* + * Emulated domains start at 0x10000 to not clash with ACPI _SEG + * domains. Per ACPI r6.0, sec 6.5.6, _SEG returns an integer, of + * which the lower 16 bits are the PCI Segment Group (domain) number. + * Other bits are currently reserved. + */ + sd->domain = pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(0, 0x10000, INT_MAX); + if (sd->domain < 0) + return sd->domain; + + sd->node = pcibus_to_node(vmd->dev->bus); + vmd->bus = pci_create_root_bus(&vmd->dev->dev, vmd->busn_start, &vmd_ops, sd, &resources); if (!vmd->bus) { + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(sd->domain); pci_free_resource_list(&resources); vmd_remove_irq_domain(vmd); return -ENODEV; @@ -1005,6 +997,7 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id) return -ENOMEM; vmd->dev = dev; + vmd->sysdata.domain = PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET; vmd->instance = ida_alloc(&vmd_instance_ida, GFP_KERNEL); if (vmd->instance < 0) return vmd->instance; @@ -1070,6 +1063,7 @@ static void vmd_remove(struct pci_dev *dev) vmd_detach_resources(vmd); vmd_remove_irq_domain(vmd); ida_free(&vmd_instance_ida, vmd->instance); + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(vmd->sysdata.domain); } static void vmd_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev) -- 2.51.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: vmd: Switch to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: vmd: Switch to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() Dan Williams @ 2025-10-27 20:08 ` Dave Jiang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Dave Jiang @ 2025-10-27 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Williams, bhelgaas Cc: linux-pci, jonathan.derrick, lpieralisi, kwilczynski, mani, robh, Szymon Durawa, Nirmal Patel On 10/24/25 3:46 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > The new common domain number allocator can replace the custom allocator > in VMD. > > Beyond some code reuse benefits it does close a potential race whereby > vmd_find_free_domain() collides with new PCI buses coming online with a > conflicting domain number. Such a race has not been observed in > practice, hence not tagging this change as a fix. > > As VMD uses pci_create_root_bus() rather than pci_alloc_host_bridge() + > pci_scan_root_bus_bridge() it has no chance to set ->domain_nr in the > bridge so needs to manage freeing the domain number on its own. > > Cc: Szymon Durawa <szymon.durawa@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>> --- > drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 40 +++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c > index b4b62b9ccc45..03b5920138f0 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c > @@ -578,22 +578,6 @@ static void vmd_detach_resources(struct vmd_dev *vmd) > vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR2].child = NULL; > } > > -/* > - * VMD domains start at 0x10000 to not clash with ACPI _SEG domains. > - * Per ACPI r6.0, sec 6.5.6, _SEG returns an integer, of which the lower > - * 16 bits are the PCI Segment Group (domain) number. Other bits are > - * currently reserved. > - */ > -static int vmd_find_free_domain(void) > -{ > - int domain = 0xffff; > - struct pci_bus *bus = NULL; > - > - while ((bus = pci_find_next_bus(bus)) != NULL) > - domain = max_t(int, domain, pci_domain_nr(bus)); > - return domain + 1; > -} > - > static int vmd_get_phys_offsets(struct vmd_dev *vmd, bool native_hint, > resource_size_t *offset1, > resource_size_t *offset2) > @@ -878,13 +862,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features) > .parent = res, > }; > > - sd->vmd_dev = vmd->dev; > - sd->domain = vmd_find_free_domain(); > - if (sd->domain < 0) > - return sd->domain; > - > - sd->node = pcibus_to_node(vmd->dev->bus); > - > /* > * Currently MSI remapping must be enabled in guest passthrough mode > * due to some missing interrupt remapping plumbing. This is probably > @@ -910,9 +887,24 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features) > pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &vmd->resources[1], offset[0]); > pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &vmd->resources[2], offset[1]); > > + sd->vmd_dev = vmd->dev; > + > + /* > + * Emulated domains start at 0x10000 to not clash with ACPI _SEG > + * domains. Per ACPI r6.0, sec 6.5.6, _SEG returns an integer, of > + * which the lower 16 bits are the PCI Segment Group (domain) number. > + * Other bits are currently reserved. > + */ > + sd->domain = pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr(0, 0x10000, INT_MAX); > + if (sd->domain < 0) > + return sd->domain; > + > + sd->node = pcibus_to_node(vmd->dev->bus); > + > vmd->bus = pci_create_root_bus(&vmd->dev->dev, vmd->busn_start, > &vmd_ops, sd, &resources); > if (!vmd->bus) { > + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(sd->domain); > pci_free_resource_list(&resources); > vmd_remove_irq_domain(vmd); > return -ENODEV; > @@ -1005,6 +997,7 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id) > return -ENOMEM; > > vmd->dev = dev; > + vmd->sysdata.domain = PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET; > vmd->instance = ida_alloc(&vmd_instance_ida, GFP_KERNEL); > if (vmd->instance < 0) > return vmd->instance; > @@ -1070,6 +1063,7 @@ static void vmd_remove(struct pci_dev *dev) > vmd_detach_resources(vmd); > vmd_remove_irq_domain(vmd); > ida_free(&vmd_instance_ida, vmd->instance); > + pci_bus_release_emul_domain_nr(vmd->sysdata.domain); > } > > static void vmd_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation 2025-10-24 22:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation Dan Williams 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms Dan Williams 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: vmd: Switch to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() Dan Williams @ 2025-10-28 17:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2025-10-28 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Williams Cc: bhelgaas, linux-pci, jonathan.derrick, lpieralisi, kwilczynski, mani, robh, Dexuan Cui, Haiyang Zhang, K. Y. Srinivasan, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Michael Kelley, Nirmal Patel, Suzuki K Poulose, Szymon Durawa, Wei Liu On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 03:46:20PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Changes since v1 [1]: > - Rebase on v6.18-rc2 > - Support callers supplying both a hint and a range for the Hyper-V hint > + fallback case (Michael) > - Add comment explaining domain number 0 vs Gen1 VMs, and domain values > greater than U16_MAX concerns (Michael) > - Leave the VMD status quo comment about requesting domain numbers > > U16_MAX > > [1]: http://lore.kernel.org/20250716160835.680486-1-dan.j.williams@intel.com > > The PCI/TSM effort created a sample driver to test ABI flows > (samples/devsec/ [2]). Suzuki observed that it only worked on x86 due to > its dependency on CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=n. I.e. an unfortunate > restriction for what should be an architecture agnostic test framework. > > Introduce a new pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() helper that all "soft" > host-bridge drivers can share and hide the CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > details behind that helper. > > [2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/devsec/tsm.git/commit/?id=0e16ce0b9c64 > > Dan Williams (2): > PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms > PCI: vmd: Switch to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() > > include/linux/pci.h | 7 ++++ > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 62 +++++------------------------ > drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 40 ++++++++----------- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 24 ++++++++++- > drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 +++- > 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) Applied to pci/enumeration for v6.19, thanks, Dan! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-28 17:39 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-10-24 22:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation Dan Williams 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Enable host bridge emulation for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC platforms Dan Williams 2025-10-25 19:53 ` Michael Kelley 2025-10-27 23:45 ` dan.j.williams 2025-10-27 20:08 ` Dave Jiang 2025-10-24 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: vmd: Switch to pci_bus_find_emul_domain_nr() Dan Williams 2025-10-27 20:08 ` Dave Jiang 2025-10-28 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Unify domain emulation Bjorn Helgaas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).