From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Oliver OHalloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] genirq/manage: Reduce priority of forced secondary interrupt handler
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 13:06:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251028120652.AJUTgtwZ@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6dcdb41be2694886b8dbf4fe7b3ab89e9d5114c.1761569303.git.lukas@wunner.de>
On 2025-10-27 13:59:31 [+0100], Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Crystal reports that the PCIe Advanced Error Reporting driver gets stuck
> in an infinite loop on PREEMPT_RT:
>
> Both the primary interrupt handler aer_irq() as well as the secondary
> handler aer_isr() are forced into threads with identical priority.
> Crystal writes that on the ARM system in question, the primary handler
> has to clear an error in the Root Error Status register...
>
> "before the next error happens, or else the hardware will set the
> Multiple ERR_COR Received bit. If that bit is set, then aer_isr()
> can't rely on the Error Source Identification register, so it scans
> through all devices looking for errors -- and for some reason, on
> this system, accessing the AER registers (or any Config Space above
> 0x400, even though there are capabilities located there) generates
> an Unsupported Request Error (but returns valid data). Since this
> happens more than once, without aer_irq() preempting, it causes
> another multi error and we get stuck in a loop."
>
> The issue does not show on non-PREEMPT_RT because the primary handler
> runs in hardirq context and thus can preempt the threaded secondary
> handler, clear the Root Error Status register and prevent the secondary
> handler from getting stuck.
Not sure if I mentioned it before but this is due to forced threaded
IRQs which can also be enabled on non-PREEMPT_RT systems via `threadirqs`.
> Emulate the same behavior on PREEMPT_RT by assigning a lower default
> priority to the secondary handler if the primary handler is forced into
> a thread.
>
> Reported-by: Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250902224441.368483-1-crwood@redhat.com/
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> @@ -856,6 +856,19 @@ void sched_set_fifo_low(struct task_struct *p)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_set_fifo_low);
>
> +/*
> + * For when the primary interrupt handler is forced into a thread, in addition
> + * to the (always threaded) secondary handler. The secondary handler gets a
> + * slightly lower priority so that the primary handler can preempt it, thereby
> + * emulating the behavior of a non-PREEMPT_RT system where the primary handler
> + * runs in hardirq context.
s/non-PREEMPT_RT/non-forced threaded/ ?
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 12:59 [PATCH v2] genirq/manage: Reduce priority of forced secondary interrupt handler Lukas Wunner
2025-10-28 12:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-10-28 13:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-28 13:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251028120652.AJUTgtwZ@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=afazekas@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=crwood@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox