Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver OHalloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] genirq/manage: Reduce priority of forced secondary interrupt handler
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 13:06:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251028120652.AJUTgtwZ@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6dcdb41be2694886b8dbf4fe7b3ab89e9d5114c.1761569303.git.lukas@wunner.de>

On 2025-10-27 13:59:31 [+0100], Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Crystal reports that the PCIe Advanced Error Reporting driver gets stuck
> in an infinite loop on PREEMPT_RT:
> 
> Both the primary interrupt handler aer_irq() as well as the secondary
> handler aer_isr() are forced into threads with identical priority.
> Crystal writes that on the ARM system in question, the primary handler
> has to clear an error in the Root Error Status register...
> 
>    "before the next error happens, or else the hardware will set the
>     Multiple ERR_COR Received bit.  If that bit is set, then aer_isr()
>     can't rely on the Error Source Identification register, so it scans
>     through all devices looking for errors -- and for some reason, on
>     this system, accessing the AER registers (or any Config Space above
>     0x400, even though there are capabilities located there) generates
>     an Unsupported Request Error (but returns valid data).  Since this
>     happens more than once, without aer_irq() preempting, it causes
>     another multi error and we get stuck in a loop."
> 
> The issue does not show on non-PREEMPT_RT because the primary handler
> runs in hardirq context and thus can preempt the threaded secondary
> handler, clear the Root Error Status register and prevent the secondary
> handler from getting stuck.

Not sure if I mentioned it before but this is due to forced threaded
IRQs which can also be enabled on non-PREEMPT_RT systems via `threadirqs`.

> Emulate the same behavior on PREEMPT_RT by assigning a lower default
> priority to the secondary handler if the primary handler is forced into
> a thread.
> 
> Reported-by: Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250902224441.368483-1-crwood@redhat.com/
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> @@ -856,6 +856,19 @@ void sched_set_fifo_low(struct task_struct *p)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_set_fifo_low);
>  
> +/*
> + * For when the primary interrupt handler is forced into a thread, in addition
> + * to the (always threaded) secondary handler.  The secondary handler gets a
> + * slightly lower priority so that the primary handler can preempt it, thereby
> + * emulating the behavior of a non-PREEMPT_RT system where the primary handler
> + * runs in hardirq context.

s/non-PREEMPT_RT/non-forced threaded/ ?

Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-28 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-27 12:59 [PATCH v2] genirq/manage: Reduce priority of forced secondary interrupt handler Lukas Wunner
2025-10-28 12:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-10-28 13:44   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-28 13:57     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251028120652.AJUTgtwZ@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=afazekas@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=crwood@redhat.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox