From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE022868B0; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761847710; cv=none; b=QyH9sQMa19d76qYOqsZ08+/5cilYRkGfhK4ylsQu2J4EOnF4nk3ymcU2fNG+n4pQt12NjTbAy8p2W5RzTOR74BzcLnNS3r4F7dGLaxnAGTBd7xxW6Hnqu5UPq6jGa8ul6uAltq9h1Ls3c+UIAt2cNn95HqHjrjzuM0+X+CBKk+g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761847710; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6NBqGEyIKXsDEC70trCS2FNCzv3oKxwoniTgmbfYXQg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZUinZLd/6szoO0ZQdIjUIc7XXjV29ji+eTW99o/pV3IqY7srtbQSorUskRt8ZsVjk6iTJj2+lW0C1YW45jeBlDwZ/u9XpWjEJhm/4PZRgi26i0nDwQ08wgBR0Xja5TGBljzsa75vJfcrH/2uRcegVwSJFjvsGuZFtBw402X6wFM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AOBfqnku; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AOBfqnku" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77563C19421; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:08:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761847710; bh=6NBqGEyIKXsDEC70trCS2FNCzv3oKxwoniTgmbfYXQg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AOBfqnku1sZvD5ZsXyFGso2P0DTH9hWTtw7jGdwJPOLRpC7xppWpu54ekM16qI9jU bhyQAjP2ASJAcGboFHlXNe7e9LDrQ8u78VTsMOS6oDDMDo1S2zIZHa086gmZR+9MsP er8W4m1bwJQ0UEHQX92Kot1F/G9OOyBAf9G/fqipjUUyQOTUEM3BxeWx4NkqL62uw+ 03efc511z5uV7ykmAFuuO5ssR/RqKEEo734rzYgo+bLjoILDa0MePKGXMvit8OiXaG OM9ixcwJisiSt4UhRc8zr6T34y4wqBirNtrLFGnYPrdUlXL0ZmaJJijcoPw2pZpzr4 he8qZcDibL/gw== Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:08:27 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Johan Hovold Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Bjorn Helgaas , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Abel Vesa , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom,pcie-x1e80100: Add missing required power-domains Message-ID: <20251030180827.GA110725-robh@kernel.org> References: <20251029-dt-bindings-pci-qcom-fixes-power-domains-v1-0-da7ac2c477f4@linaro.org> <20251029-dt-bindings-pci-qcom-fixes-power-domains-v1-9-da7ac2c477f4@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 05:46:30PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Power domains should be required for PCI, so the proper SoC supplies are > > turned on. > > > > Cc: > > I have a feeling I've pointed this out before, but these kind of binding > patches really does not seem to qualify for stable backporting (e.g. > does not "fix a real bug that bothers people"). Presumably if someone omits power-domain and the driver doesn't work, then it's a bug affecting them. I'm fine with dropping the stable tag because it will still most likely get picked up with the Fixes tag. :) Rob