From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 242AA33DEFA for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763033326; cv=none; b=aJYudD0CMHX8sxtBpP86VPPt2VireZpfHGZ7RTBgB7TTaDeEADuynr7oZLEaEkKwaDHZmXAAukRbnu7uAFyDD4jg76wrl3eIZwGZ13r1++6udGU2zf7y6pOJJ52Pk6xW21ZasI6Bmq9zSdDhY3d2Wt6RAie1TsUcHY6wsgkQD8c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763033326; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hFIdchMz70SRW7I6tXRAH6ooNypVtLfMibRNFhxHWqw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=o8EknCDt4b7AbeIBKPyOnb9P2J/lGp+qU6ad5dnMuIGIHmlQwsIYgLzEDEEpjW/x5HCbdaNxMb8hbwGpnVpClHNSr3NwrfVsoNGMrMrJCF3mu+K2VcvQCiraMR4IP6sfiehrWITQYvCse+Zu198RsNUsp3mUOIkWNgntXbe38Nk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4d6dLH4jPczJ46rT; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:28:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.146.113]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC7F140277; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:28:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.36; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:28:41 +0000 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:28:40 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Dan Williams CC: , , kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] drivers/virt: Drop VIRT_DRIVERS build dependency Message-ID: <20251113112840.00002faa@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20251113021446.436830-2-dan.j.williams@intel.com> References: <20251113021446.436830-1-dan.j.williams@intel.com> <20251113021446.436830-2-dan.j.williams@intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.84) To dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:14:39 -0800 Dan Williams wrote: > All of the objects in drivers/virt/ have their own configuration symbols to > gate compilation. I.e. nothing gets added to the kernel with > CONFIG_VIRT_DRIVERS=y in isolation. > > Unconditionally descend into drivers/virt/ so that consumers do not need to > add an additional CONFIG_VIRT_DRIVERS dependency. > > Fix warnings of the form: > > Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for TSM > Depends on [n]: VIRT_DRIVERS [=n] > Selected by [y]: > - PCI_TSM [=y] && PCI [=y] > > ...where PCI_TSM selects CONFIG_TSM, but fails to select > CONFIG_VIRT_DRIVERS. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511041832.ylcgIiqN-lkp@intel.com/ > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Seems reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron