From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com (relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com [192.19.144.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B622C21FE; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 20:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.19.144.207 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766177228; cv=none; b=eh505jUIG7Gv3k+lBluY45vtoZ74o5QJhv3ZW4RBmYCD4GDuLpMKKIDfyaa4abEtykGdqYwhEKfZ0r7EVDvW9AZfZ0XmzgISExRSEoql9cSyUuUeDO9qqsQwJCKO7qWKlOq9/sFOrcJVpWjZr/lAj+c2MXMVVpLHnyVQYeQv16c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766177228; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lZ0bxC35naE5+wUog0cgqIFR4ld8pJimi6uVMVZ57Zg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=KQ/ZuIaX1HNKLxH624KWKXba8UqGXXBMjM2HIfuYEqeGdEEcEZ2lVY8H4uN6VodkjcNJghbJn29OKqUMuVzKw6TtptaMV8tQarOuSxQoNJDVb4D4H2mdbCkCSONJGnB1SbYL7OkS9jwSLUdJ/xBLHGRGXo11xa7sQdFQqgiqoRg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=broadcom.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=broadcom.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b=cRys4NeC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.19.144.207 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=broadcom.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=broadcom.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b="cRys4NeC" Received: from mail-lvn-it-01.broadcom.com (mail-lvn-it-01.lvn.broadcom.net [10.36.132.253]) by relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B992DC000C85; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:41:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com B992DC000C85 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=broadcom.com; s=dkimrelay; t=1766176917; bh=lZ0bxC35naE5+wUog0cgqIFR4ld8pJimi6uVMVZ57Zg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cRys4NeCPx6M6/fxqgmh571+lNk3oKoaXsmnkKrunE1LmpaCBpZIwtwkjNa9b+CuQ R+Hc3vVxTpEeULcrHiBih8YSTVhQsAxRIIViETdQmBBaAEqwMH6k8q4qFkAyTS6wos H/9d2znu9giDTH0vOnwIs6S5sGltwF5jMQfteUSM= Received: from fainelli-desktop.igp.broadcom.net (fainelli-desktop.dhcp.broadcom.net [10.67.48.245]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail-lvn-it-01.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49451867F; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:41:27 -0800 (PST) From: Florian Fainelli To: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Andrea della Porta , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Florian Fainelli , Bjorn Helgaas , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iivanov@suse.de, svarbanov@suse.de, mbrugger@suse.com, Phil Elwell Cc: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] misc: rp1: drop overlay support Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:41:27 -0800 Message-ID: <20251219204127.1015395-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <4b0aa7160877cf128b9bc713776bcac73c46eb24.1766077285.git.andrea.porta@suse.com> References: <4b0aa7160877cf128b9bc713776bcac73c46eb24.1766077285.git.andrea.porta@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Florian Fainelli On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 20:09:07 +0100, Andrea della Porta wrote: > The RP1 driver can load an overlay at runtime to describe the inner > peripherals. This has led to a lot of confusion regarding the naming > of nodes, their topology and the reclaiming of related node resources. > > Since the overlay is currently not fully functional, drop its support > in the driver in favor of the fully described static DT. > > This also means that this driver does not depend on CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES > and no longer requires PCI quirks to dynamically create the intermediate > PCI nodes. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta > --- Applied to https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux/commits/devicetree-arm64/fixes, thanks! -- Florian