From: Matthew W Carlis <mattc@purestorage.com>
To: macro@orcam.me.uk
Cc: ashishk@purestorage.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
mattc@purestorage.com, msaggi@purestorage.com,
sconnor@purestorage.com, alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] PCI: pcie_failed_link_retrain() return if dev is not ASM2824
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 18:12:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251223011218.964-1-mattc@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2512010559060.36486@angie.orcam.me.uk>
On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> Root port can tell us if PCIe errors are going to the BIOS. IF any of the
>> ErrCorrectable, ErrNon-Fatal, ErrFatal, are set in the RootCtrl then those
>> error types would most likely go to the BIOS even if the OS thinks it took
>> control. Someone will have to correct me if wrong about ARM. If you sent
>> the full lspci -vvv of root port, USP/DSP/USP combo I could figure out
>> whats going on.
>>
>
> I've attached a full `lspci -xxxx' dump instead, just in case anything
> else turns out useful. I'll appreciate if you have a look.
I looked through the tree and don't see anything obviously wrong in the error
settings. Those CE's on 02:03.0 might be left-over from boot. In any case I
wouldn't expect to see BadTLP or BadDLLP unless there was something wrong...
It would be interesting to clear them and see if a link reset could trigger
them again.
As for the quirk itself I want to re-ping this review since it looks like the
link speed 'quirk' has also been implicated by Alok here in a CR here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/c296df33-f9c0-42f7-8add-6966d89d00c4@oracle.com/
We know the quirk can be executed on devices that are functioning completely correctly.
There might be a justification here to have an additional/new 'pci_fixup_pass'
that would execute after link-training failures & let the specific devices
decide how to handle link recovery, but I don't want this specific quirk running
against any of the devices in my systems.
Matt
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-23 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 5:24 [PATCH v2 0/1] PCI: pcie_failed_link_retrain() return if dev is not ASM2824 Matthew W Carlis
2025-07-02 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Matthew W Carlis
2025-07-03 12:11 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-07-03 23:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Matthew W Carlis
2025-07-04 10:20 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-07-08 22:49 ` Matthew W Carlis
2025-07-09 9:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-07-09 18:52 ` Matthew W Carlis
2025-07-09 20:27 ` Matthew W Carlis
2025-07-11 13:46 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-07-16 13:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-07-23 19:13 ` Matthew W Carlis
2025-08-01 16:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-08-15 0:35 ` Matthew W Carlis
2025-12-01 6:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-12-23 1:12 ` Matthew W Carlis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251223011218.964-1-mattc@purestorage.com \
--to=mattc@purestorage.com \
--cc=alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com \
--cc=ashishk@purestorage.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=msaggi@purestorage.com \
--cc=sconnor@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox