From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Håkon Bugge" <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
Casey Leedom <leedom@chelsio.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ACPI: Do not fiddle with ExtTag and RO in program_hpx_type2
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 17:22:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260107232205.GA447140@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205142831.4063891-1-haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
[+cc Alexander's @fb.com address]
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 03:28:29PM +0100, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> After commit 60db3a4d8cc9 ("PCI: Enable PCIe Extended Tags if
> supported"), the kernel controls enablement of extended tags
> (ExtTag). Similar, after commit a99b646afa8a ("PCI: Disable PCIe
> Relaxed Ordering if unsupported"), the kernel controls the relaxed
> ordering bit (RO), in the sense that the kernel keeps the bit set (if
> already set) unless the RC does not support it.
>
> On some platforms, when program_hpx_type2() is called and the _HPX
> object's Type2 records are, let's say, dubious, we may end up
> resetting ExtTag and RO, although they were explicit set or kept set
> by the OSPM [1].
This text about Type 2 records in ACPI r6.6, sec 6.2.10.3, seems a
little ambiguous to me:
A PCI Express-aware OS that has assumed ownership of native hot plug
(via _OSC) but does not support or does not have ownership of the
AER register set must use the data values returned by the _HPX
object’s Type 2 record to program the AER registers of a hot-added
PCI Express device. However, since the Type 2 record also includes
register bits that have functions other than AER, OSPM must ignore
values contained within this setting record that are not applicable.
If I squint, I can read that as meaning that Type 2 is really there
just for AER, and the OS:
- should only use a Type 2 record when it owns PCIe native hotplug
(native_pcie_hotplug) but does not own AER (!native_aer),
- should only program AER registers, and
- should *ignore* bits unrelated to AER.
Most of the registers in Type 2 are in the AER Capability. Device
Control is in the PCIe Capability, but if _OSC has granted AER
ownership to the OS, that includes the Error Reporting Enable bits in
Device Control (there's a PCI Firmware spec ECN to this effect:
https://members.pcisig.com/wg/Firmware/document/20514).
Type 2 does include Link Control, which is in the PCIe Capability and
doesn't seem related to AER, so maybe I'm on the wrong track. But if
Type 2 was intended to handle things *other* than AER, I would think
the PCIe Capability Slot Control and Root Control would have been
included.
So *maybe* program_hpx_type2() should mask out everything from
pci_exp_devctl_or except PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_CERE, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_NFERE,
PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_FERE, and PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_URRE? I have no idea what we
would do with Link Control though.
I wish I knew the history of this, but I don't.
> The Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) Specification
> version 6.6 has a provision that gives the OSPM the ability to
> control these bits any way. In a note in section 6.2.9, it is stated:
>
> "OSPM may override the settings provided by the _HPX object's Type2
> record (PCI Express Settings) or Type3 record (PCI Express Descriptor
> Settings) when OSPM has assumed native control of the corresponding
> feature."
>
> So, in order to preserve the increased performance of ExtTag and RO on
> platforms that support any of these, we make sure program_hpx_type2()
> doesn't reset them.
>
> [1] Operating System-directed configuration and Power Management
>
> Fixes: 60db3a4d8cc9 ("PCI: Enable PCIe Extended Tags if supported")
> Fixes: a99b646afa8a ("PCI: Disable PCIe Relaxed Ordering if unsupported")
> Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index 9369377725fa0..6a2ae1b821732 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -324,15 +324,18 @@ static void program_hpx_type2(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hpx_type2 *hpx)
> return;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Don't allow _HPX to change MPS or MRRS settings. We manage
> - * those to make sure they're consistent with the rest of the
> - * platform.
> + /* Don't allow _HPX to change MPS, MRRS, ExtTag, or RO
> + * settings. We manage those to make sure they're consistent
> + * with the rest of the platform.
> */
> hpx->pci_exp_devctl_and |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD |
> - PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ;
> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ |
> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_EXT_TAG |
> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN;
> hpx->pci_exp_devctl_or &= ~(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD |
> - PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ);
> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ |
> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_EXT_TAG |
> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN);
>
> /* Initialize Device Control Register */
> pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
> --
> 2.43.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 14:28 [PATCH] PCI/ACPI: Do not fiddle with ExtTag and RO in program_hpx_type2 Håkon Bugge
2025-12-18 12:20 ` Haakon Bugge
2026-01-07 17:58 ` Haakon Bugge
2026-01-07 18:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-01-07 23:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-01-08 17:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-12 12:07 ` Haakon Bugge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260107232205.GA447140@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=haakon.bugge@oracle.com \
--cc=leedom@chelsio.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox