Re: [Bug 220775] snd_ctxfi fails init since 6.18-rc1

Re: [Bug 220775] snd_ctxfi fails init since 6.18-rc1

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Mon, 26 Jan 2026, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:

> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220775
> 
> --- Comment #27 from Malte (malte+kbz@tnxip.de) ---
> Did this patch make it into 6.19? I just tried -rc7 and the issue is still
> there.

Unfortunately, it's still not applied:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=1035150

(I also checked pci/resource branch and it doesn't appear there).

The fixes used to be in a separate series but I've so many dependencies 
between my pending work I had to put them into that larger series (in 
hopes that it would have all gotten applied in this cycle).

The regression fixes (this and some ppc (IIRC) regression) are in the 
first 5 commits. I'm not sure if taking the entire series this late is 
a good idea even if the rest of the series should be most no functional 
changes in preparation to some work not yet submitted.


-- 
 i.

Re: [Bug 220775] snd_ctxfi fails init since 6.18-rc1

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2026, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:
> 
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220775
> > 
> > --- Comment #27 from Malte (malte+kbz@tnxip.de) ---
> > Did this patch make it into 6.19? I just tried -rc7 and the issue is still
> > there.
> 
> Unfortunately, it's still not applied:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=1035150
> 
> (I also checked pci/resource branch and it doesn't appear there).
> 
> The fixes used to be in a separate series but I've so many dependencies 
> between my pending work I had to put them into that larger series (in 
> hopes that it would have all gotten applied in this cycle).
> 
> The regression fixes (this and some ppc (IIRC) regression) are in the 
> first 5 commits. I'm not sure if taking the entire series this late is 
> a good idea even if the rest of the series should be most no functional 
> changes in preparation to some work not yet submitted.

Sorry, I completely missed this.  It looks like we do have an extra
week this cycle, so two weeks until v6.19 final.  I put these on
pci/resource and hopefully we can make it for v6.20.

Bjorn