From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Dominik Brodowski" <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Malte Schröder" <malte+lkml@tnxip.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] PCI: Rewrite bridge window head alignment function
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:17:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260126221723.GA318550@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219174036.16738-3-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> The calculation of bridge window head alignment is done by
> calculate_mem_align() [*]. With the default bridge window alignment, it
> is used for both head and tail alignment.
>
> The selected head alignment does not always result in tight-fitting
> resources (gap at d4f00000-d4ffffff):
>
> d4800000-dbffffff : PCI Bus 0000:06
> d4800000-d48fffff : PCI Bus 0000:07
> d4800000-d4803fff : 0000:07:00.0
> d4800000-d4803fff : nvme
> d4900000-d49fffff : PCI Bus 0000:0a
> d4900000-d490ffff : 0000:0a:00.0
> d4900000-d490ffff : r8169
> d4910000-d4913fff : 0000:0a:00.0
> d4a00000-d4cfffff : PCI Bus 0000:0b
> d4a00000-d4bfffff : 0000:0b:00.0
> d4a00000-d4bfffff : 0000:0b:00.0
> d4c00000-d4c07fff : 0000:0b:00.0
> d4d00000-d4dfffff : PCI Bus 0000:15
> d4d00000-d4d07fff : 0000:15:00.0
> d4d00000-d4d07fff : xhci-hcd
> d4e00000-d4efffff : PCI Bus 0000:16
> d4e00000-d4e7ffff : 0000:16:00.0
> d4e80000-d4e803ff : 0000:16:00.0
> d4e80000-d4e803ff : ahci
> d5000000-dbffffff : PCI Bus 0000:0c
>
> This has not been caused problems (for years) with the default bridge
> window tail alignment that grossly over-estimates the required tail
> alignment leaving more tail room than necessary. With the introduction
> of relaxed tail alignment that leaves no extra tail room whatsoever,
> any gaps will immediately turn into assignment failures.
>
> Introduce head alignment calculation that ensures no gaps are left and
> apply the new approach when using relaxed alignment. We may want to
> consider using it for the normal alignment eventually, but as the first
> step, solve only the problem with the relaxed tail alignment.
>
> ([*] I don't understand the algorithm in calculate_mem_align().)
>
> Fixes: 5d0a8965aea9 ("[PATCH] 2.5.14: New PCI allocation code (alpha, arm, parisc) [2/2]")
check_commits complains that this SHA1 doesn't exist:
In commit
a21a27a0e893 ("PCI: Rewrite bridge window head alignment function")
Fixes tag
Fixes: 5d0a8965aea9 ("[PATCH] 2.5.14: New PCI allocation code (alpha, arm, parisc) [2/2]")
has these problem(s):
- Target SHA1 does not exist
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=5d0a8965aea9
does find it, but says it's not reachable.
It's so old (2002) that I'm not sure it's worth including it as a
Fixes: tag.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 17:40 [PATCH 00/23] PCI: Resource code fixes (supercedes earlier series) & cleanups Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 01/23] PCI: Fix bridge window alignment with optional resources Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 02/23] PCI: Rewrite bridge window head alignment function Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-26 22:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-01-27 11:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-27 22:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 03/23] PCI: Stop over-estimating bridge window size Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-05 15:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-05 16:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 04/23] resource: Increase MAX_IORES_LEVEL to 8 Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 05/23] PCI: Remove old_size limit from bridge window sizing Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-26 17:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-26 20:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-27 11:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-27 22:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-27 10:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 06/23] PCI: Push realloc check into pbus_size_mem() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 07/23] PCI: Pass bridge window resource to pbus_size_mem() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 08/23] PCI: Use res_to_dev_res() in reassign_resources_sorted() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 09/23] PCI: Fetch dev_res to local var in __assign_resources_sorted() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 10/23] PCI: Add pci_resource_is_bridge_win() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 11/23] PCI: Log reset and restore of resources Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 12/23] PCI: Check invalid align earlier in pbus_size_mem() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 13/23] PCI: Add pbus_mem_size_optional() to handle optional sizes Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 14/23] resource: Mark res given to resource_assigned() as const Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:47 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 15/23] PCI: Use resource_assigned() in setup-bus.c algorithm Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 16/23] PCI: Properly prefix struct pci_dev_resource handling functions Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 17/23] PCI: Separate cardbus setup & build it only with CONFIG_CARDBUS Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 18/23] PCI: Handle CardBus specific params in setup-cardbus.c Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 19/23] PCI: Use scnprintf() instead of sprintf() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 20/23] PCI: Add Bus Number + Secondary Latency Timer as dword fields Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 21/23] PCI: Convert to use Bus Number field defines Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 22/23] PCI: Add pbus_validate_busn() for Bus Number validation Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 23/23] PCI: Move scanbus bridge scanning to setup-cardbus.c Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-26 17:39 ` [PATCH 00/23] PCI: Resource code fixes (supercedes earlier series) & cleanups Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260126221723.GA318550@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=malte+lkml@tnxip.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox