From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, alex@shazbot.org,
lukas@wunner.de, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: fix slot reset device locking
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:03:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260128180338.GA423654@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260116184150.3013258-2-kbusch@meta.com>
[+cc Dan, Jinhui]
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:41:50AM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
>
> Like pci_bus_lock, pci_slot_lock needs to lock the bridge device to
> prevent the warning:
I *think* this actually refers to pci_bus_trylock() and
pci_slot_trylock() (not pci_bus_lock() and pci_slot_lock()), since
that's what this patch changes?
It's unfortunate that pci_bus_trylock() and pci_slot_trylock() are so
similar but separate. If there were combined, this kind of issue
where one is fixed but the other isn't wouldn't happen.
But what about pci_bus_lock() and pci_slot_lock()? They are also
almost identical, but pci_bus_lock() locks bus->self while
pci_slot_lock() does not. Should it?
All these almost-but-not-quite identical paths make my head hurt ;)
> pcieport 0000:e2:05.0: unlocked secondary bus reset via: pciehp_reset_slot+0x55/0xa0
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 3378221c5723a..5f8b0d06a1459 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -5460,6 +5460,8 @@ static void pci_slot_lock(struct pci_slot *slot)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
>
> + if (slot->bus->self)
> + pci_dev_lock(slot->bus->self);
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
> continue;
> @@ -5483,12 +5485,17 @@ static void pci_slot_unlock(struct pci_slot *slot)
> else
> pci_dev_unlock(dev);
> }
> + if (slot->bus->self)
> + pci_dev_unlock(slot->bus->self);
> }
>
> /* Return 1 on successful lock, 0 on contention */
> static int pci_slot_trylock(struct pci_slot *slot)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *dev;
> + struct pci_dev *dev, *bridge = slot->bus->self;
> +
> + if (bridge && !pci_dev_trylock(bridge))
> + return 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
> @@ -5511,6 +5518,9 @@ static int pci_slot_trylock(struct pci_slot *slot)
> else
> pci_dev_unlock(dev);
> }
> +
> + if (bridge)
> + pci_dev_unlock(bridge);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-16 18:41 [PATCH 1/2] pci: fix slot trylock error handling Keith Busch
2026-01-16 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] pci: fix slot reset device locking Keith Busch
2026-01-28 18:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-01-28 19:13 ` Keith Busch
2026-01-28 22:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-29 15:59 ` Keith Busch
2026-01-28 19:54 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-28 21:07 ` dan.j.williams
2026-01-28 21:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-28 21:00 ` dan.j.williams
2026-01-27 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] pci: fix slot trylock error handling Keith Busch
2026-01-28 9:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-28 15:11 ` Keith Busch
2026-01-28 15:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-27 23:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-28 20:47 ` dan.j.williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260128180338.GA423654@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox