public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI/IOV: Fix deadlock when removing PF with enabled SR-IOV
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 18:48:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260203004810.GA14073@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251216-revert_sriov_lock-v3-0-dac4925a7621@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 11:14:01PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> Doing additional testing for a distribution backport of commit
> 05703271c3cd ("PCI/IOV: Add PCI rescan-remove locking when
> enabling/disabling SR-IOV") Benjamin found a hang with s390's
> recover attribute. Further investigation showed this to be a deadlock by
> recursively trying to take pci_rescan_remove lock when removing a PF
> with enabled SR-IOV.
> 
> The issue can be reproduced on both s390 and x86_64 with:
> 
>     $ echo <NUM> > /sys/bus/pci/devices/<pf>/sriov_numvfs
>     $ echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/<pf>/remove
> 
> As this seems worse than the original, hard to hit, race fixed by the
> cited commit I think we first want to revert the broken fix.
> 
> Following that patch 2 attempts to fix the original issue by taking the
> PCI rescan/remove lock directly before calling into the driver's
> sriov_configure() callback enforcing the rule that this should only
> be called with the pci_rescan_remove_lock held.
> 
> Thanks,
> Niklas
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Rebased on v6.19-rc1, also verified issue is still there and the fix
>   still works
> - Added more of the lockdep splat for better context
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251119-revert_sriov_lock-v2-0-ea50eb1e8f96@linux.ibm.com
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Collected R-b from Benjamin
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251030-revert_sriov_lock-v1-0-70f82ade426f@linux.ibm.com
> 
> ---
> Niklas Schnelle (2):
>       Revert "PCI/IOV: Add PCI rescan-remove locking when enabling/disabling SR-IOV"
>       PCI/IOV: Fix race between SR-IOV enable/disable and hotplug
> 
>  drivers/pci/iov.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8
> change-id: 20251029-revert_sriov_lock-aef4557f360f

Applied to pci/iov for v6.20, thanks!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-03  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-16 22:14 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI/IOV: Fix deadlock when removing PF with enabled SR-IOV Niklas Schnelle
2025-12-16 22:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] Revert "PCI/IOV: Add PCI rescan-remove locking when enabling/disabling SR-IOV" Niklas Schnelle
2025-12-16 22:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI/IOV: Fix race between SR-IOV enable/disable and hotplug Niklas Schnelle
2026-03-17  1:57   ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-17  9:01     ` Benjamin Block
2026-03-17  9:46       ` Benjamin Block
2026-03-17 11:33         ` Benjamin Block
2026-03-17 13:08           ` Lukas Wunner
2026-03-17 13:18             ` Lukas Wunner
2026-03-17 17:09               ` Benjamin Block
2026-02-01 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI/IOV: Fix deadlock when removing PF with enabled SR-IOV Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-02-02 15:47   ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-02-03  0:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-02-23 14:10   ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-02-23 17:33     ` Benjamin Block
2026-02-23 18:34       ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-02-25 14:59         ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-02-25 18:32           ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260203004810.GA14073@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox