From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5A352405ED; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 21:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771536364; cv=none; b=N8oOm6i3fyNa634XNPAQFsUcTkRURLXbLdCfL2+fNokG2VMVS5EecGg+vLeEIvWM5FoB9M0lh9kwpXJMkHYV8OC1zQmRKUIYFf6JSPGW6hRIJjsTApWkPqbpNP2awf5d9xUFEhIgAVICIx4UMGwOfu0s71Xuqun98KfNG+w6AzQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771536364; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YIDjjCT8VlKCDwPmSc/JOrd11FT8NFis22ah5fZFVWc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Soh2oNuxKWw+XNxaHtCR0f443XYu7a62oun4qkNpyp9DT6jzLm7zByOU3BHCclnq5KtHzILRl2uckqq9DNuiM8FYzr2c9ybUC8KBtybbRLmp06ydwl0YeBJmU0Uh5Bafh7RqxEyhUN3ZMvTWw/uGjsG/1bUtFxlF8Uwo4bj3hiQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VnDHfqAl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VnDHfqAl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71334C4CEF7; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 21:26:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771536364; bh=YIDjjCT8VlKCDwPmSc/JOrd11FT8NFis22ah5fZFVWc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=VnDHfqAl28ewj6l+URSiwtYAg0COPhvU2xDL/9kqpn6A1gVe8Xh3XtNOyXaA6Seoj sUyTnfvB2tsE5Dq5dQhzsj/MIDTaOk5yOl6FhwaL3rSZJnr8SH9Gqj8NziQx1mK+gk Xeflc+vNRaTv9C5a2eqcOoUe8jFR7XFdzoY7XlW9UFJnbYGoS05atiYZLDwOzKqUrb ESFJet/g54Z+EbsCoO9B1WPx5jWPZG1ii1TSh9i+B9xIr0nAI8ehH2xzK4eLPl8EIg Q6/HZRafbWPG/krOjqAt7B+t9aBpt2c0fGL5lRxCio7Qgmb7hgH7ZrJqQ/kpw5jVNt OWbd6u9KjYacQ== Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:26:02 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Matthew W Carlis , ALOK TIWARI , ashishk@purestorage.com, msaggi@purestorage.com, sconnor@purestorage.com, Lukas Wunner , Ilpo =?utf-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= , Jiwei , guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com, ahuang12@lenovo.com, sunjw10@lenovo.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: Always lift 2.5GT/s restriction in PCIe failed link retraining Message-ID: <20260219212602.GA3498590@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 07:24:23PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hi, > > I've figured out that backporting will be less intrusive if an update to > use `->supported_speeds' is posted as a separate follow-up change. So it > is now 2/3 in this series, after 1/3 comprising the original patch, only > trivially updated. Then 3/3 moves the maximum link speed determination > earlier on for an early exit in the PCIE_SPEED_2_5GT case; maybe unlikely, > but essentially free now, now that we retrieve the speed anyway, and makes > code a little simpler yet. > > Please let me know if you'd prefer me to fold 2/3 into 1/3 after all. > > Previous iterations: > > - v1 at: . Applied to pci/enumeration for v7.1, thanks. This will be rebased after v7.0-rc1.