From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marcin Bernatowicz" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI/IOV: Restore initial VF ReBAR sizes on SR-IOV disable/failure
Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 20:36:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505203651.6D631C2BCB4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505170010.3414074-3-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Early error returns in sriov_enable() bypass the newly introduced sriov_restore_vf_rebar_initial_sizes() cleanup.
--
commit 4da183a318507a36de3ca157ee8755ad1eec90ca
Author: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
PCI/IOV: Restore initial VF ReBAR sizes on SR-IOV disable/failure
This commit introduces a mechanism to restore the initial VF BAR sizes when
SR-IOV is disabled or when enabling it fails. This prevents the PCI core
from persisting inflated VF BAR sizes, which can lead to MMIO space exhaustion.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/5937
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> index 217e133a38c73..a05c1be388d2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -687,36 +721,42 @@ static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn)
> }
> if (nres != iov->nres) {
> pci_err(dev, "not enough MMIO resources for SR-IOV\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_restore;
> }
Should the earlier error returns in sriov_enable() also jump to err_restore?
There are early validation checks before this point that return directly:
drivers/pci/iov.c:sriov_enable() {
...
pci_read_config_word(dev, iov->pos + PCI_SRIOV_INITIAL_VF, &initial);
if (initial > iov->total_VFs ||
(!(iov->cap & PCI_SRIOV_CAP_VFM) && (initial != iov->total_VFs)))
return -EIO;
if (nr_virtfn < 0 || nr_virtfn > iov->total_VFs ||
(!(iov->cap & PCI_SRIOV_CAP_VFM) && (nr_virtfn > initial)))
return -EINVAL;
...
}
If an early exit occurs here, the hardware BAR remains inflated and
iov->num_VFs remains 0.
Because iov->num_VFs is 0, subsequent cleanup calls like pci_disable_sriov()
during driver teardown or system shutdown will bypass the restore logic due to
the early return in sriov_disable():
drivers/pci/iov.c:sriov_disable() {
struct pci_sriov *iov = dev->sriov;
if (!iov->num_VFs)
return;
...
}
Will this leave the hardware BAR permanently inflated across kexec or warm
reboots, potentially leading to the MMIO space exhaustion this patch aims to
fix?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260505170010.3414074-1-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 17:00 [PATCH 0/3] PCI/IOV: Restore initial VF BAR sizing after VF ReBAR Marcin Bernatowicz
2026-05-05 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI/IOV: Remember initial VF BAR sizes Marcin Bernatowicz
2026-05-05 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI/IOV: Restore initial VF ReBAR sizes on SR-IOV disable/failure Marcin Bernatowicz
2026-05-05 20:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-05 17:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI/IOV: Restore initial VF ReBAR sizes on PF release Marcin Bernatowicz
2026-05-05 21:17 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505203651.6D631C2BCB4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox