From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback
Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 22:17:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506221705.53B33C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506-dma_prep_config-v4-4-85b3d22babff@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The return value of dw_edma_device_config() is ignored, leading to silent preparation failures and corrupted state.
- [High] Lockless modification of shared channel configuration causes a race condition during concurrent descriptor preparation.
--
commit 72239068fd086ad95d773ab05d33c4df60a82fea
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback
This commit introduces the .device_prep_config_sg() callback for the
dw-edma driver. It combines configuration and scatter-gather descriptor
preparation into a single step.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index c2feb3adc79fa..f7f58b0010e26 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -577,10 +577,11 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
> }
>
> static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> -dw_edma_device_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> - unsigned int len,
> - enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> - unsigned long flags, void *context)
> +dw_edma_device_prep_config_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> + unsigned int len,
> + enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> + unsigned long flags,
> + struct dma_slave_config *config)
> {
> struct dw_edma_transfer xfer;
>
> @@ -591,6 +592,9 @@ dw_edma_device_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> xfer.flags = flags;
> xfer.type = EDMA_XFER_SCATTER_GATHER;
>
> + if (config)
> + dw_edma_device_config(dchan, config);
dw_edma_device_config() can return an error code like -EINVAL if the
configuration is invalid. Does ignoring this return value cause the transfer
to be scheduled with a corrupted or stale state? Should this return NULL if
the configuration fails?
Also, the new .device_prep_config_sg callback is often used to allow lockless
descriptor preparation. However, dw_edma_device_config() modifies shared
channel state:
dw_edma_device_config() {
...
chan->non_ll = false;
...
memcpy(&chan->config, config, sizeof(*config));
chan->configured = true;
...
}
If multiple threads prepare transfers concurrently, can this cause a data
race resulting in corrupted descriptors?
> +
> return dw_edma_device_transfer(&xfer);
> }
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260506-dma_prep_config-v4-0-85b3d22babff@nxp.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 20:44 [PATCH v4 0/9] dmaengine: Add new API to combine configuration and descriptor preparation Frank Li
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] dmaengine: Add API to combine configuration and preparation (sg and single) Frank Li
2026-05-06 21:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] dmaengine: Add safe API to combine configuration and preparation Frank Li
2026-05-06 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Use dmaenigne_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank Li
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback Frank Li
2026-05-06 22:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer() Frank Li
2026-05-06 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Remove unnecessary dmaengine_terminate_sync() on each DMA transfer Frank Li
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API Frank Li
2026-05-06 23:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: epf-mhi: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank Li
2026-05-06 23:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() API Frank Li
2026-05-06 23:31 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260506221705.53B33C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox