From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xlpang@linux.alibaba.com,
oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/2] PCI: Fix crash when access broken ROM
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 17:20:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508222005.GA25034@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508082128.3344255-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 04:21:26PM +0800, Guixin Liu wrote:
> v11 -> v12:
> - Add rb tag from Krzysztof Wilczyński in the first patch, thanks.
> - Change "get" to "Get".
> - Renamed parameter last_image → expect_valid in
> pci_rom_is_header_valid() to better reflect its semantics: it
> indicates whether the caller expects the image to be valid
> (and thus whether a missing/invalid signature should be reported
> as an error or as normal end-of-chain).
> - Tightened image alignment check: replaced the 2-byte alignment check
> with a 512-byte (PCI_ROM_IMAGE_SECTOR_SIZE) alignment check on image,
> per PCI Firmware Specification r3.3, sec 5.1, which mandates that each
> ROM image starts on a 512-byte boundary. This also satisfies the
> natural-alignment requirement of readw() on architectures such as arm64.
> - Updated comment to cite the PCI Firmware Spec r3.3 sec 5.1 as the
> authoritative source for the alignment requirement, and to explain the
> relationship between page-aligned rom, sector-aligned image,
> and the IOMEM access constraint.
> - Fixed off-by-one in overflow checks: check_add_overflow() now uses
> PCI_ROM_HEADER_SIZE - 1 and data_len - 1 so that header_end / end
> represent the inclusive last byte of the region, matching the
> subsequent > rom_end comparison.
> - Refactored signature-check log flow: collapsed the dual-return branches
> into a single if (signature != PCI_ROM_IMAGE_SIGNATURE) block, emitting
> the appropriate pci_info() based on expect_valid, then returning false;
> success path returns true at the end.
> - Reorder pci_rom_is_data_struct_valid() to check the "PCIR" signature
> before reading data_len, so bad signatures are still logged.
> - Collapse the signature branch to early-return on failure,
> matching the style of pci_rom_is_header_valid().
> - Add PCI_ROM_DATA_STRUCT_MIN_LEN (0x18), the PCI 2.x baseline PCI Data
> Structure length.
> - Reject data_len < PCI_ROM_DATA_STRUCT_MIN_LEN to keep the fixed-offset
> reads (PCI_ROM_IMAGE_LEN @0x10, PCI_ROM_LAST_IMAGE_INDICATOR @0x15)
> in pci_get_rom_size() inside the mapped ROM window.
> - Cite PCI Firmware Spec r3.3 sec 5.1.3 Table 5-2 in the new macro's
> comment.
>
> v10 -> v11:
> - Change 'pci rom' to 'PCI ROM' of the tittle of the first patch.
> - Add Andy Shevchenko's rb tag in the first patch, thanks.
>
> v9 -> v10:
> - Reorder the header files, and not touch kernel.h
> - Change PCI_ROM_IMAGE_LEN_UNIT_BYTES to PCI_ROM_IMAGE_SECTOR_SIZE.
> - Add a comment for PCI_ROM_DATA_STRUCT_SIGNATURE.
>
> v8 -> v9:
> - Supplemental explanation for the commit body of the first patch.
> - Change PCI_ROM_IMAGE_LEN_UNIT_SZ_512 to PCI_ROM_IMAGE_LEN_UNIT_BYTES,
> and change it's definition to SZ_512.
> - Use u16 and u32 for signature val instead of unsigned short/int.
>
> v7 -> v8:
> - Ordered header files alphabetically.
> - Convert the literals too in the firt patch.
> - Use local val to save signature instead of reading twice.
>
> v6 -> v7:
> - Put all named defines to a separate patch.
> - Change PCI_ROM_IMAGE_LEN_UNIT_BYTES to PCI_ROM_IMAGE_LEN_UNIT_SZ_512.
> - Named BIT(7) to PCI_ROM_LAST_IMAGE_INDICATOR_BIT.
> - Fix all other comments from Ilpo, such as including header files,
> and alignment fault, Thanks.
>
> v5 -> v6:
> - Convert some magic number to named defines, suggested by
> Ilpo, thanks.
>
> v4 -> v5:
> - Add Andy Shevchenko's rb tag, thanks.
> - Change u64 to unsigned long.
> - Change pci_rom_header_valid() to pci_rom_is_header_valid() and
> change pci_rom_data_struct_valid() to pci_rom_is_data_struct_valid().
> - Change rom_end from rom+size to rom+size-1 for more readble,
> and also change header_end >= rom_end to header_end > rom_end, same
> as data structure end.
> - Change if(!last_image) to if (last_image)..
> - Use U16_MAX instead of 0xffff.
> - Split check_add_overflow() from data_len checking.
> - Remove !!() when reading last_image, and Use BIT(7) instead of 0x80.
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - Use "u64" instead of "uintptr_t".
> - Invert the if statement to avoid excessive indentation.
> - Add comment for alignment checking.
> - Change last_image's type from int to bool.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Add pci_rom_header_valid() helper for checking image addr and signature.
> - Add pci_rom_data_struct_valid() helper for checking data struct add
> and signature.
> - Handle overflow issue when adding addr with size.
> - Handle alignment fault when running on arm64.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Fix commit body problems, such as blank line in "Call Trace" both sides,
> thanks, (Andy Shevchenko).
> - Remove every step checking, just check the addr is in header or data
> struct.
> - Add Suggested-by: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com> tag.
>
> Guixin Liu (2):
> PCI: Introduce named defines for PCI ROM
> PCI: Check ROM header and data structure addr before accessing
>
> drivers/pci/rom.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Applied to pci/rom for v7.2, thanks for all your work on this!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 8:21 [PATCH v12 0/2] PCI: Fix crash when access broken ROM Guixin Liu
2026-05-08 8:21 ` [PATCH v12 1/2] PCI: Introduce named defines for PCI ROM Guixin Liu
2026-05-08 8:21 ` [PATCH v12 2/2] PCI: Check ROM header and data structure addr before accessing Guixin Liu
2026-05-08 22:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508222005.GA25034@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox