From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() API
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 01:49:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514014929.7F6C2C19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512-dma_prep_config-v5-9-26865bf7d935@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Mismatch between the commit message and the actual API used.
- [Medium] The patch masks specific DMA configuration error codes, unconditionally returning -ENOMEM on failure.
--
commit 05fb1a88b098522438016a4c4b3491605a64cf5f
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() API
This commit refactors atmel_aes_dma_transfer_start() to use a new combined
DMA engine API for configuration and scatterlist preparation. The commit
message notes that this is intended to simplify the code with no functional
change.
> crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() API
>
> Using new API dmaengine_prep_config_single() to simple code.
This isn't a bug, but the commit message and subject mention
dmaengine_prep_config_single(), while the code actually introduces and uses
dmaengine_prep_config_sg().
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/atmel-aes.c b/drivers/crypto/atmel-aes.c
> index b393689400b4c..d890b5a277b9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/atmel-aes.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/atmel-aes.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -820,12 +819,9 @@ static int atmel_aes_dma_transfer_start(struct atmel_aes_dev *dd,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - err = dmaengine_slave_config(dma->chan, &config);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> -
> - desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(dma->chan, dma->sg, dma->sg_len, dir,
> - DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> + desc = dmaengine_prep_config_sg(dma->chan, dma->sg, dma->sg_len, dir,
> + DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_CTRL_ACK,
> + &config);
> if (!desc)
> return -ENOMEM;
The commit message states there is no functional change, but does this alter
the error propagation?
In the original code, if dmaengine_slave_config() failed, its specific error
code was returned to the caller. Looking at the definition of
dmaengine_prep_config_sg(), it returns NULL if the underlying
dmaengine_slave_config() call fails:
include/linux/dmaengine.h:dmaengine_prep_config_sg() {
...
if (config)
if (dmaengine_slave_config(chan, config))
return NULL;
...
}
Since atmel_aes_dma_transfer_start() now handles a NULL return by returning
-ENOMEM, might this mask configuration errors by presenting them as
out-of-memory failures instead of their original error codes?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260512-dma_prep_config-v5-0-26865bf7d935@nxp.com?part=9
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 16:41 [PATCH v5 0/9] dmaengine: Add new API to combine configuration and descriptor preparation Frank Li
2026-05-12 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] dmaengine: Add API to combine configuration and preparation (sg and single) Frank Li
2026-05-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] dmaengine: Add safe API to combine configuration and preparation Frank Li
2026-05-13 23:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Use dmaenigne_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank Li
2026-05-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback Frank Li
2026-05-14 0:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer() Frank Li
2026-05-14 0:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Remove unnecessary dmaengine_terminate_sync() on each DMA transfer Frank Li
2026-05-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API Frank Li
2026-05-14 1:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] PCI: epf-mhi: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank Li
2026-05-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() API Frank Li
2026-05-14 1:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514014929.7F6C2C19425@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox