From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yadu M G" <yadu.mg@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Initialize pp->lock before MSI domain registration
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 21:26:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514212621.55873C2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514181901.315647-1-yadu.mg@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditional double initialization of `pp->lock` in `dw_pcie_allocate_domains()` destroys lock state and corrupts lockdep tracking for standard platforms.
--
commit 34c5622cf23f408a8b7191136ff7caf71c5a0456
Author: Yadu M G <yadu.mg@oss.qualcomm.com>
PCI: dwc: Initialize pp->lock before MSI domain registration
This commit adds an initialization of pp->lock in dw_pcie_allocate_domains()
to fix a lockdep warning on Qcom platforms. These platforms allocate the MSI
domain from a custom .msi_init callback, bypassing the standard
dw_pcie_host_init() flow.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index c9517a3488368..de316f103c73b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -215,6 +215,13 @@ int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> .host_data = pp,
> };
>
> + /*
> + * Initialize pp->lock here to cover direct callers from custom
> + * .msi_init() paths (e.g. firmware-managed platforms) that
> + * bypass dw_pcie_host_init().
> + */
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&pp->lock);
> +
Does this unconditionally re-initialize the lock for standard platforms?
In the standard DesignWare host initialization flow, dw_pcie_host_init()
initializes pp->lock at the beginning of the function. It then calls the
platform-specific pp->ops->init() callback, which on some platforms like
Uniphier configures and enables INTx interrupts.
If an INTx interrupt fires asynchronously and its handler legitimately
acquires pp->lock, would this second raw_spin_lock_init() call in
dw_pcie_allocate_domains() destroy the lock state while it is in use?
Re-initializing the spinlock forcibly resets its internal state to
unlocked and assigns a new lockdep key, which could introduce a data
race or corrupt lock dependency tracking for platforms using the
standard initialization flow.
> pp->irq_domain = msi_create_parent_irq_domain(&info, &dw_pcie_msi_parent_ops);
> if (!pp->irq_domain) {
> dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to create IRQ domain\n");
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260514181901.315647-1-yadu.mg@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 18:19 [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Initialize pp->lock before MSI domain registration Yadu M G
2026-05-14 21:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514212621.55873C2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yadu.mg@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox