From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gerd Bayer" <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm/pci: Use official API to iterate over PCI buses
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 14:59:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515145940.E85AAC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515-priv_root_buses-v1-2-f8e393c57390@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Calling a sleepable lock from a hardware interrupt handler causes a 'scheduling while atomic' BUG.
--
commit f34de1e1be1288e13d00eee56b2fe60eb5f4ec85
Author: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
arm/pci: Use official API to iterate over PCI buses
This commit replaces iterating over pci_root_buses with pci_find_next_bus().
This change is intended to allow pci_root_buses to become private to the PCI
core.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> index ac0e890510daf..35642c9ba054c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> @@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ static void pcibios_bus_report_status(struct pci_bus *bus, u_int status_mask, in
>
> void pcibios_report_status(u_int status_mask, int warn)
> {
> - struct pci_bus *bus;
> + struct pci_bus *bus = NULL;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(bus, &pci_root_buses, node)
> + while ((bus = pci_find_next_bus(bus)) != NULL)
Can calling pci_find_next_bus() from an interrupt handler lead to a
scheduling while atomic bug?
In arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c, pcibios_report_status() is called
directly from primary hardware interrupt handlers, such as dc21285_abort_irq()
and dc21285_serr_irq(). These handlers execute in an atomic hardirq context
where sleeping is not permitted.
Since pci_find_next_bus() unconditionally acquires the pci_bus_sem read-write
semaphore using down_read(), this introduces a blocking operation into that
atomic path:
dc21285_abort_irq() [hardirq context]
pcibios_report_status()
pci_find_next_bus()
down_read(&pci_bus_sem) [sleeps]
Does this path need an alternative approach to safely iterate over the buses
without taking a sleeping lock?
> pcibios_bus_report_status(bus, status_mask, warn);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260515-priv_root_buses-v1-0-f8e393c57390@linux.ibm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 14:22 [PATCH 0/5] PCI: Finally make pci_root_buses private Gerd Bayer
2026-05-15 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] alpha/pci: Use official API to iterate over PCI buses Gerd Bayer
2026-05-15 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm/pci: " Gerd Bayer
2026-05-15 14:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-15 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/pci: " Gerd Bayer
2026-05-15 15:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/pci: " Gerd Bayer
2026-05-15 15:13 ` Dave Hansen
2026-05-15 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI: Make pci_root_buses private to PCI core Gerd Bayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515145940.E85AAC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox