From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pranjal Shrivastava" <praan@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix a UAF in the probe_device error path
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 15:06:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601150613.0F9B61F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601143644.2358771-4-praan@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Calling `rb_erase()` on an unlinked, zero-initialized stream node silently corrupts the SMMU streams rbtree by zeroing the tree root.
--
commit 785579083a69b017d9dafe6dce3c844bea656662
Author: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix a UAF in the probe_device error path
Clear the iommu->priv to NULL while returning an error from probe_device.
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index a10affb483a4f..54c7f1ae3a841 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -4206,6 +4206,7 @@ static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> arm_smmu_disable_pasid(master);
> arm_smmu_remove_master(master);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could calling arm_smmu_remove_master()
here silently corrupt the smmu streams rbtree if there are duplicate
Stream IDs?
In arm_smmu_insert_master(), master->streams is allocated with kzalloc,
leaving the rb_node zero-initialized. If a device has duplicate Stream IDs
(expected for bridged PCI devices), it skips inserting the duplicate node
into smmu->streams:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:arm_smmu_insert_master() {
...
/* Bridged PCI devices may end up with duplicated IDs */
if (existing_master == master)
continue;
...
}
However, arm_smmu_remove_master() unconditionally calls rb_erase() on all
nodes:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:arm_smmu_remove_master() {
...
for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++)
rb_erase(&master->streams[i].node, &smmu->streams);
...
}
Since the rb_erase() implementation interprets a zero-initialized node as a
root node with no children, it clears it by setting root->rb_node = NULL.
Does this detach the entire stream tracking tree?
The error path in arm_smmu_insert_master() also unconditionally calls
rb_erase() on processed nodes:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:arm_smmu_insert_master() {
...
for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
rb_erase(&master->streams[i].node, &smmu->streams);
...
}
Would this also trigger the same corruption if a failure happens after
skipping a duplicate ID?
> err_free_master:
> + dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, NULL);
> kfree(master);
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260601143644.2358771-1-praan@google.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 14:36 [PATCH v7 0/5] iommu: Standardize ATS robustness and state tracking Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] PCI/ATS: Ensure pci_ats_supported() is PF-aware for VFs Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-03 7:25 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI/ATS: Validate STU for VFs in pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-03 7:28 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix a UAF in the probe_device error path Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 15:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-03 7:31 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-03 13:28 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-03 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-06-04 2:29 ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-04 5:22 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Standardize ATS enablement failure reporting Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-03 7:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-03 9:12 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-03 10:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] iommu/vt-d: Fail probe on ATS configuration failure Pranjal Shrivastava
[not found] ` <20260601153032.36C861F00893@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-06-01 16:01 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-03 5:41 ` Baolu Lu
2026-06-03 7:34 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260601150613.0F9B61F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox