Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ali Alaei" <ali.alaei.tabatabaei@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: vmd: Handle BUS_RESTRICT_CFG value 3 for Arrow Lake-HX
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 19:12:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604191205.905A81F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604185953.17177-1-ali.alaei.tabatabaei@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Unchecked PCI configuration reads can cause device removal or read failures to be treated as a valid configuration (case 3), falsely continuing probe.
--

commit fde973a5965da08fe76816c224c875b5ef1e4a2e
Author: Ali Alaei <ali.alaei.tabatabaei@gmail.com>

PCI: vmd: Handle BUS_RESTRICT_CFG value 3 for Arrow Lake-HX

This commit adds support for Intel Arrow Lake-HX platforms where the VMD
controller's VMCONFIG register returns 3 for the BUS_RESTRICT_CFG field,
mapping it to a bus number start of 224.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> index d4ae250d4bc6d..9cf5ea2e1e20f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ static int vmd_get_bus_number_start(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
>  		case 1:
>  			vmd->busn_start = 128;
>  			break;
> +		case 3:

[Severity: Medium]
Does this change unintentionally mask device removal errors?

If the device is removed during probe, pci_read_config_word() does not
necessarily return an error code and the hardware typically returns 0xFFFF.
Because BUS_RESTRICT_CFG(0xFFFF) evaluates to 3, the driver will now treat a
read failure as a valid configuration instead of aborting the probe.

Before this patch, the value 3 hit the default case and safely returned
-ENODEV. Should there be a check to ensure the register value is not 0xFFFF
before evaluating the configuration?

>  		case 2:
>  			vmd->busn_start = 224;
>  			break;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604185953.17177-1-ali.alaei.tabatabaei@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-04 18:59 [PATCH] PCI: vmd: Handle BUS_RESTRICT_CFG value 3 for Arrow Lake-HX Ali Alaei
2026-06-04 19:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04 21:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Ali Alaei
2026-06-22 14:46   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-06-28 14:34   ` [PATCH v3] " Ali Alaei
2026-06-28 14:46     ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 17:16     ` Ali Alaei
2026-07-15  5:56     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-20 22:47     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-21 12:47       ` Lin Mohan
2026-07-21 12:50       ` Lin Mohan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260604191205.905A81F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=ali.alaei.tabatabaei@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox