From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Yuanhe Shu <xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, lihaoxiang@isrc.iscas.ac.cn,
tglx@linutronix.de, bhelgaas@google.com, jgross@suse.com,
hans.zhang@cixtech.com, himanshu.madhani@oracle.com,
roger.pau@citrix.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: add iounmap in msix_capability_init()
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:44:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610194406.GA380991@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610091951.1073318-1-xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 05:19:51PM +0800, Yuanhe Shu wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 at 10:22:12 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Does msix_setup_interrupts() already unmap this region? If it fails,
> > msix_setup_interrupts() calls pci_free_msi_irqs(), which appears to already
> > call iounmap(dev->msix_base) and sets dev->msix_base to NULL.
> >
> > If dev->msix_base was already set to NULL by pci_free_msi_irqs() during the
> > msix_setup_interrupts() error path, does this result in iounmap(NULL)?
>
> Confirmed. We hit this on Intel Emerald Rapids (192 CPUs) when running
> tools/testing/selftests/kexec/test_kexec_jump.sh.
>
> The commit message of 1a8d4c6ecb4c states:
>
> "msix_capability_init() fails to unmap the MSI-X region if
> msix_setup_interrupts() fails."
>
> This is incorrect. There is no leak on this error path.
>
> When msix_setup_interrupts() fails, the call chain is:
>
> msix_setup_interrupts()
> -> __msix_setup_interrupts()
> struct pci_dev *dev __free(free_msi_irqs) = __dev;
> ...
> return ret; // __free cleanup fires on error
>
> The __free(free_msi_irqs) cleanup calls pci_free_msi_irqs(), which
> already handles the unmap:
>
> void pci_free_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> pci_msi_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
> if (dev->msix_base) {
> iounmap(dev->msix_base); // already unmapped here
> dev->msix_base = NULL; // and set to NULL
> }
> }
>
> So dev->msix_base is unmapped and NULLed before msix_setup_interrupts()
> even returns to msix_capability_init(). The original "goto out_disable"
> was correct -- it skipped iounmap because the cleanup was already done.
>
> Commit 1a8d4c6ecb4c changed it to "goto out_unmap", adding a second
> iounmap() call on an already-NULL pointer, which triggers:
>
> WARNING: CPU#44 at iounmap+0x2a/0xe0
> Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_reset_work [nvme]
> RIP: 0010:iounmap+0x2a/0xe0
> ...
> RDI: 0000000000000000
> ...
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> msix_capability_init+0x317/0x3f0
> __pci_enable_msix_range+0x21d/0x2c0
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0xa9/0x130
> nvme_setup_io_queues+0x2a8/0x420 [nvme]
> ? __pfx_nvme_calc_irq_sets+0x10/0x10 [nvme]
> nvme_reset_work+0x151/0x340 [nvme]
> process_one_work+0x197/0x3a0
> worker_thread+0x1ab/0x320
> ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
>
> RDI=0 confirms iounmap() is called with NULL.
>
> This commit should probably be reverted. The out_unmap label and its
> iounmap() are redundant with the __free(free_msi_irqs) scoped cleanup
> in __msix_setup_interrupts(), which already takes care of unmapping
> dev->msix_base on any error path.
Thanks a lot for testing and verifying the issue!
I guess it's 1a8d4c6ecb4c ("PCI/MSI: Unmap MSI-X region on error")
that you think should be reverted? Can you or Haoxiang send a patch
to do that so this is unambiguous?
It looks like Thomas applied 1a8d4c6ecb4c, so I'll leave it up to him
to handle any revert.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-25 14:44 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: add iounmap in msix_capability_init() Haoxiang Li
2026-02-06 22:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-10 14:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-16 17:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-06-10 9:19 ` Yuanhe Shu
2026-06-10 19:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610194406.GA380991@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=hans.zhang@cixtech.com \
--cc=himanshu.madhani@oracle.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=lihaoxiang@isrc.iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox