Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Yuanhe Shu <xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, lihaoxiang@isrc.iscas.ac.cn,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bhelgaas@google.com, jgross@suse.com,
	hans.zhang@cixtech.com, himanshu.madhani@oracle.com,
	roger.pau@citrix.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: add iounmap in msix_capability_init()
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:44:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610194406.GA380991@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610091951.1073318-1-xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 05:19:51PM +0800, Yuanhe Shu wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 at 10:22:12 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Does msix_setup_interrupts() already unmap this region? If it fails,
> > msix_setup_interrupts() calls pci_free_msi_irqs(), which appears to already
> > call iounmap(dev->msix_base) and sets dev->msix_base to NULL.
> >
> > If dev->msix_base was already set to NULL by pci_free_msi_irqs() during the
> > msix_setup_interrupts() error path, does this result in iounmap(NULL)?
> 
> Confirmed. We hit this on Intel Emerald Rapids (192 CPUs) when running
> tools/testing/selftests/kexec/test_kexec_jump.sh.
> 
> The commit message of 1a8d4c6ecb4c states:
> 
>   "msix_capability_init() fails to unmap the MSI-X region if
>    msix_setup_interrupts() fails."
> 
> This is incorrect. There is no leak on this error path.
> 
> When msix_setup_interrupts() fails, the call chain is:
> 
>   msix_setup_interrupts()
>     -> __msix_setup_interrupts()
>          struct pci_dev *dev __free(free_msi_irqs) = __dev;
>          ...
>          return ret;  // __free cleanup fires on error
> 
> The __free(free_msi_irqs) cleanup calls pci_free_msi_irqs(), which
> already handles the unmap:
> 
>   void pci_free_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>   {
>       pci_msi_teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
>       if (dev->msix_base) {
>           iounmap(dev->msix_base);   // already unmapped here
>           dev->msix_base = NULL;     // and set to NULL
>       }
>   }
> 
> So dev->msix_base is unmapped and NULLed before msix_setup_interrupts()
> even returns to msix_capability_init(). The original "goto out_disable"
> was correct -- it skipped iounmap because the cleanup was already done.
> 
> Commit 1a8d4c6ecb4c changed it to "goto out_unmap", adding a second
> iounmap() call on an already-NULL pointer, which triggers:
> 
>   WARNING: CPU#44 at iounmap+0x2a/0xe0
>   Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_reset_work [nvme]
>   RIP: 0010:iounmap+0x2a/0xe0
>   ...
>   RDI: 0000000000000000
>   ...
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    msix_capability_init+0x317/0x3f0
>    __pci_enable_msix_range+0x21d/0x2c0
>    pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0xa9/0x130
>    nvme_setup_io_queues+0x2a8/0x420 [nvme]
>    ? __pfx_nvme_calc_irq_sets+0x10/0x10 [nvme]
>    nvme_reset_work+0x151/0x340 [nvme]
>    process_one_work+0x197/0x3a0
>    worker_thread+0x1ab/0x320
>    ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> 
> RDI=0 confirms iounmap() is called with NULL.
> 
> This commit should probably be reverted. The out_unmap label and its
> iounmap() are redundant with the __free(free_msi_irqs) scoped cleanup
> in __msix_setup_interrupts(), which already takes care of unmapping
> dev->msix_base on any error path.

Thanks a lot for testing and verifying the issue!

I guess it's 1a8d4c6ecb4c ("PCI/MSI: Unmap MSI-X region on error")
that you think should be reverted?  Can you or Haoxiang send a patch
to do that so this is unambiguous?

It looks like Thomas applied 1a8d4c6ecb4c, so I'll leave it up to him
to handle any revert.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-25 14:44 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: add iounmap in msix_capability_init() Haoxiang Li
2026-02-06 22:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-10 14:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-16 17:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-06-10  9:19   ` Yuanhe Shu
2026-06-10 19:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260610194406.GA380991@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=hans.zhang@cixtech.com \
    --cc=himanshu.madhani@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=lihaoxiang@isrc.iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox