From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chandrashekar Devegowda" <chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_core: Add reset_type parameter to hdev->reset() callback
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:41:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612014136.204D61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612012832.2395034-1-chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] BTINTEL_PCIE_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS flag is never cleared on reset failure, causing a permanent deadlock of the recovery mechanism.
--
commit 01c1befdb681c2e10f544ce7e32e0eba288f218c
Author: Chandrashekar Devegowda <chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>
Bluetooth: hci_core: Add reset_type parameter to hdev->reset() callback
This patch adds a reset_type parameter to the Bluetooth hci_dev reset
callback, allowing userspace to specify whether to perform a Function Level
Reset (FLR) or a Product Level Device Reset (PLDR) via sysfs. Internal
callers are updated to default to FLR.
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
> index 9e39327dc1fe2..d3a03cf964216 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2680,7 +2680,7 @@ static void btintel_pcie_reset_work(struct work_struct *wk)
> pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> }
>
> -static void btintel_pcie_reset(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +static void btintel_pcie_reset(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 reset_type)
> {
> struct btintel_pcie_data *data;
>
> @@ -2692,6 +2692,12 @@ static void btintel_pcie_reset(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> if (test_and_set_bit(BTINTEL_PCIE_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS, &data->flags))
> return;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if btintel_pcie_reset_work() fails, does
the BTINTEL_PCIE_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS flag remain set permanently?
Looking at btintel_pcie_reset_work() in the same file, if
pci_try_reset_function() or btintel_pcie_setup_hdev() fail, the code jumps
to the out_enable label:
btintel_pcie_reset_work() {
err = pci_try_reset_function(pdev);
if (err) {
BT_ERR("Failed resetting the pcie device (%d)", err);
goto out_enable;
}
...
data->flags = 0;
...
out_enable:
enable_work(&data->coredump_work);
out:
...
}
Because the error paths bypass the data->flags = 0 assignment, the
BTINTEL_PCIE_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS flag is never cleared. Would this cause
all future reset attempts (including the sysfs triggers introduced in this
patch) to be rejected indefinitely by the test_and_set_bit() check until
the module is reloaded?
> + data->reset_type = (reset_type == 1) ?
> + BTINTEL_PCIE_IOSF_PRR_PLDR : BTINTEL_PCIE_IOSF_PRR_FLR;
> +
> + bt_dev_info(hdev, "Reset triggered: %s",
> + data->reset_type == BTINTEL_PCIE_IOSF_PRR_PLDR ? "PLDR" : "FLR");
> +
> pci_dev_get(data->pdev);
> schedule_work(&data->reset_work);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612012832.2395034-1-chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 1:28 [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_core: Add reset_type parameter to hdev->reset() callback Chandrashekar Devegowda
2026-06-12 1:28 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] Bluetooth: btintel_pcie: Fix TOCTOU race in reset path Chandrashekar Devegowda
2026-06-12 1:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 11:56 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-12 1:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12 14:08 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_core: Add reset_type parameter to hdev->reset() callback Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2026-06-12 14:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-06-12 14:43 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612014136.204D61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox