Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chandrashekar Devegowda" <chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_core: Add reset_type parameter to hdev->reset() callback
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:41:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612014136.204D61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612012832.2395034-1-chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] BTINTEL_PCIE_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS flag is never cleared on reset failure, causing a permanent deadlock of the recovery mechanism.
--

commit 01c1befdb681c2e10f544ce7e32e0eba288f218c
Author: Chandrashekar Devegowda <chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>

Bluetooth: hci_core: Add reset_type parameter to hdev->reset() callback

This patch adds a reset_type parameter to the Bluetooth hci_dev reset
callback, allowing userspace to specify whether to perform a Function Level
Reset (FLR) or a Product Level Device Reset (PLDR) via sysfs. Internal
callers are updated to default to FLR.

> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
> index 9e39327dc1fe2..d3a03cf964216 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2680,7 +2680,7 @@ static void btintel_pcie_reset_work(struct work_struct *wk)
>  	pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
>  }
>  
> -static void btintel_pcie_reset(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +static void btintel_pcie_reset(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 reset_type)
>  {
>  	struct btintel_pcie_data *data;
>  
> @@ -2692,6 +2692,12 @@ static void btintel_pcie_reset(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>  	if (test_and_set_bit(BTINTEL_PCIE_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS, &data->flags))
>  		return;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if btintel_pcie_reset_work() fails, does
the BTINTEL_PCIE_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS flag remain set permanently?

Looking at btintel_pcie_reset_work() in the same file, if
pci_try_reset_function() or btintel_pcie_setup_hdev() fail, the code jumps
to the out_enable label:

btintel_pcie_reset_work() {
        err = pci_try_reset_function(pdev);
        if (err) {
                BT_ERR("Failed resetting the pcie device (%d)", err);
                goto out_enable;
        }
        ...
        data->flags = 0;
        ...
out_enable:
        enable_work(&data->coredump_work);
out:
        ...
}

Because the error paths bypass the data->flags = 0 assignment, the
BTINTEL_PCIE_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS flag is never cleared. Would this cause
all future reset attempts (including the sysfs triggers introduced in this
patch) to be rejected indefinitely by the test_and_set_bit() check until
the module is reloaded?

> +	data->reset_type = (reset_type == 1) ?
> +			    BTINTEL_PCIE_IOSF_PRR_PLDR : BTINTEL_PCIE_IOSF_PRR_FLR;
> +
> +	bt_dev_info(hdev, "Reset triggered: %s",
> +		    data->reset_type == BTINTEL_PCIE_IOSF_PRR_PLDR ? "PLDR" : "FLR");
> +
>  	pci_dev_get(data->pdev);
>  	schedule_work(&data->reset_work);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612012832.2395034-1-chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12  1:28 [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_core: Add reset_type parameter to hdev->reset() callback Chandrashekar Devegowda
2026-06-12  1:28 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] Bluetooth: btintel_pcie: Fix TOCTOU race in reset path Chandrashekar Devegowda
2026-06-12  1:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 11:56   ` kernel test robot
2026-06-12  1:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12 14:08 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_core: Add reset_type parameter to hdev->reset() callback Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2026-06-12 14:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-06-12 14:43     ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260612014136.204D61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox