From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Geraldo Nascimento" <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: rockchip: drive at 2.5 GT/s, error other speeds
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:37:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616153748.EA2D41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7421df7a7b7778ee99363cccfdfabbfa8aa6ab5e.1781622998.git.geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Spurious warning emitted when the optional 'max-link-speed' device tree property is absent.
- [Low] The parsed `max-link-speed` value stored in `rockchip->link_gen` is dead code and entirely ignored during link initialization.
--
commit 3b268bac2a052935f203b8d3ae0eea857d63f07b
Author: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
PCI: rockchip: drive at 2.5 GT/s, error other speeds
This commit configures the Rockchip PCIe core to drive at a maximum link
speed of 2.5 GT/s to prevent potential data loss or hardware issues. It
ignores other configured speeds with a warning and removes 5.0 GT/s defines.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ffd05070-9879-4468-94e3-b88968b4c21b@rock-chips.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> index 0f88da3788054..456dcfd676ed7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> @@ -66,8 +66,10 @@ int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> }
>
> rockchip->link_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(node);
> - if (rockchip->link_gen < 0 || rockchip->link_gen > 2)
> - rockchip->link_gen = 2;
> + if (rockchip->link_gen < 0 || rockchip->link_gen >= 2) {
> + rockchip->link_gen = 1;
> + dev_warn(dev, "invalid max-link-speed, limited to 2.5 GT/s\n");
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Since the max-link-speed device tree property is optional,
of_pci_get_max_link_speed() will return a negative error code such as -EINVAL
when it is absent. Does this mean the rockchip->link_gen < 0 check will cause
a spurious warning on every boot for perfectly valid device trees that
omit this property?
>
> for (i = 0; i < ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS; i++)
> rockchip->pm_rsts[i].id = rockchip_pci_pm_rsts[i];
[ ... ]
> @@ -147,12 +149,8 @@ int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> goto err_exit_phy;
> }
>
> - if (rockchip->link_gen == 2)
> - rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_GEN_SEL_2,
> - PCIE_CLIENT_CONFIG);
> - else
> - rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_GEN_SEL_1,
> - PCIE_CLIENT_CONFIG);
> + rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_GEN_SEL_1,
> + PCIE_CLIENT_CONFIG);
[Severity: Low]
Does this unconditional write make the rockchip->link_gen value parsed in
rockchip_pcie_parse_dt() obsolete? If link_gen is no longer used during link
initialization, could the device tree parsing logic and state be removed
entirely to simplify the code?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1781622998.git.geraldogabriel@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 15:24 [PATCH v7 0/3] PCI: rockchip: 5.0 GT/s speed discouraged by Rockchip Geraldo Nascimento
2026-06-16 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] PCI: rockchip-ep: do not attempt 5.0 GT/s retraining Geraldo Nascimento
2026-06-16 15:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 19:06 ` Dragan Simic
2026-06-16 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] PCI: rockchip-host: " Geraldo Nascimento
2026-06-16 15:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 19:08 ` Dragan Simic
2026-06-16 15:26 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: rockchip: drive at 2.5 GT/s, error other speeds Geraldo Nascimento
2026-06-16 15:37 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 19:10 ` Dragan Simic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616153748.EA2D41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox