From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/sysfs: Fix out-of-bounds read in pci_write_legacy_io()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:42:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616164230.81F281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616163131.2763281-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The Alpha implementation of `pci_legacy_write` passes arguments to `outb`, `outw`, and `outl` in the wrong order, causing arbitrary I/O port writes.
--
commit 21e9260d6465f8f037bb9292c32c44b565eca000
Author: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
PCI/sysfs: Fix out-of-bounds read in pci_write_legacy_io()
This commit addresses an out-of-bounds read in pci_write_legacy_io() by
only reading the requested number of bytes using little-endian accessors.
It also removes byte-shifting workarounds in the PowerPC architecture
code that are no longer necessary.
> On little-endian PowerPC (POWER8 and later), they extracted the wrong
> bytes, so a 1-byte write wrote an out-of-bounds byte instead of the
> requested value. On big-endian, the native load also caused out_le16()
> and out_le32() to reverse the user's bytes on the wire for 2 and 4 byte
> writes. The little-endian helpers resolve both issues, so the shifts
> are removed.
>
> No changes are needed for the Alpha platform.
>
> The legacy_io file is root-only and exists only on Alpha and PowerPC,
> the two architectures that define HAVE_PCI_LEGACY.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the claim that no changes are needed for
Alpha doesn't seem quite right.
Looking at pci_legacy_write() in arch/alpha/kernel/pci-sysfs.c, it calls the
I/O port functions with the port and value reversed:
arch/alpha/kernel/pci-sysfs.c:pci_legacy_write() {
...
switch(size) {
case 1:
outb(port, val);
return 1;
case 2:
if (port & 1)
return -EINVAL;
outw(port, val);
return 2;
case 4:
if (port & 3)
return -EINVAL;
outl(port, val);
return 4;
}
...
}
Since Alpha's outb(), outw(), and outl() expect arguments in the order
(value, port), doesn't passing port as the value and val as the port
address incorrectly use user-supplied data as the target I/O port address?
Could this allow arbitrary I/O port writes system-wide?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616163131.2763281-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 16:31 [PATCH 1/2] PCI/sysfs: Fix out-of-bounds read in pci_write_legacy_io() Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-06-16 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI/sysfs: Fix read byte order in pci_read_legacy_io() Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-06-16 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 16:42 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/sysfs: Fix out-of-bounds read in pci_write_legacy_io() Krzysztof Wilczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616164230.81F281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox