From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B603EA967; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782819123; cv=none; b=k5AHSVhs4+0sQtsOdssHLCQ6+lQwsuv74dr2q+jBDczEKIP86fizi9zZE+kCo8WFweM7R0ixfyI/1N21diWQqiq1AOCpZwSZwJRFv+IhZ873MLpYdjz5/kQMuacBBZN8tQ1idGR0i7Ze65HH2vmLHYwJH8UP2Sd+zY5HN+yYQyA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782819123; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qw5eUodpuuhbgntKIhL27/6ojGdVojQhvgW3kPZO6z8=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=cwuQdVqmXH0rxhkH51OwPzTJKch3dEd8YJzQN5dRTYkBRjUWcvZdyo/5mwN8HwM0x9E0NgK2fi61ENlDq10uP+JAmmACnBBW7qCT9sJozFJUfRGHi7VWTyPw870oCfrYGJTqRK/rdjFwRT88eNoKhRcO00Mzc+aG6D51J69AFUM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fOD5rb/f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fOD5rb/f" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CFB51F000E9; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:32:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782819122; bh=e6UWuCee3PVTFV11gKaFyBHMHcmKAXHf4jjgdE4xenk=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=fOD5rb/fBmsX0lZewMbsKHnm2SPmCGCgkx54A2B8Zn6iuVXc87ZeY+AxSCBV2ZyY8 vshfvwuSnZ5jeO/SzvAJBg0Sl5z8lUH1sv7/FgIKeeIiNEhO3Q8coTlS8CvGg1cbiZ 8toPes+fPcZhpENfaAfr8rUlwkZPNAYanoWprBmdu1zfKdJRv9BTGqY/QVGixi9Znr 2rU6a8JrUkKNkg83nFpcV2jdee/YrDDw3GTQGeJ57fFT5wKFFNndM/903ae2nmSU5t Ne35z2i62ucu6xo46xqzcfWZBx96yo4qOR9gQR0pwfFzKo5sgalDhfXXmgEBQitKwY 7vSVwxZ1RKtBQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] PCI: of: Remove fwnode_dev_initialized() call for a PCI root bridge node Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Herve Codina" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260630102804.413563-9-herve.codina@bootlin.com> References: <20260630102804.413563-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20260630102804.413563-9-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:32:01 +0000 Message-Id: <20260630113202.2CFB51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > During the instantiation of devices described by a device-tree overlay > applied on a PCI device, devlink displays the following kind of debug > messages instead of creating the expected links: > 'Not linking xxxx - might never become dev' >=20 > Without those expected links, the device removal order cannot be > correct. >=20 > Those debug traces are printed by fw_devlink_create_devlink(). In our > use case, they are all printed because the supplier of the link has at > least one of its ancestor with its fwnode flag FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED > set. >=20 > The culprit ancestor is the PCI root bridge. >=20 > [ ... ] > are correctly created. >=20 > Fixes: 1f340724419e ("PCI: of: Create device tree PCI host bridge node") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630102804.4135= 63-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com?part=3D8