From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Maurice Hieronymus" <mhi@mailbox.org>
Cc: ojeda@kernel.org, "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: pci: rework device enabling API
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 09:48:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702094826.7122C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702-rust-pci-enable-device-managed-v1-1-75bc4ff2935c@mailbox.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The new `enable_device_managed` API uses `pcim_enable_device()`, which activates legacy automatic IRQ management that conflicts with Rust's `alloc_irq_vectors()` and violates a documented kernel API contract, leading to double-free issues.
- [High] `disable_device` and `enable_device` are exposed as safe functions, allowing safe Rust code to unbalance the PCI device's `enable_cnt` reference count, causing soundness holes that lead to DMA-after-free.
--
commit 47e71534c620f329a7271d6914a49b70de710719
Author: Maurice Hieronymus <mhi@mailbox.org>
Subject: rust: pci: rework device enabling API
This commit replaces enable_device_mem() with enable_device_managed() to
provide automatic cleanup on unbind via pcim_enable_device(). It also
introduces an unmanaged enable_device()/disable_device() pair for paths
like runtime PM, enabling both I/O and memory resources.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260620-b4-rust-pci-edu-driver-v2-0-6fd6684f2c14@mailbox.org [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/DJEPMYC7J6ZG.D0ODUD4YGFCT@kernel.org/ [2]
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/pci.rs b/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> index 5071cae6543fd..a408b34120777 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> @@ -453,10 +453,30 @@ pub fn pci_class(&self) -> Class {
> }
>
> impl<'a> Device<device::Core<'a>> {
> - /// Enable memory resources for this device.
> - pub fn enable_device_mem(&self) -> Result {
> + /// Enable I/O and memory resources for this device.
> + ///
> + /// This function is unmanaged and does not perform any cleanup when the device is unbound.
> + /// For a managed function take a look at [`Device::enable_device_managed`].
> + #[inline]
> + pub fn enable_device(&self) -> Result {
> + // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is guaranteed to be a pointer to a valid `struct pci_dev`.
> + to_result(unsafe { bindings::pci_enable_device(self.as_raw()) })
> + }
> +
> + /// Disable I/O and memory resources for this device.
> + ///
> + /// This function is the counterpart to [`Device::enable_device`].
> + #[inline]
> + pub fn disable_device(&self) {
[Severity: High]
Is it safe to expose these as safe Rust functions?
Since they directly modify the underlying PCI device's enable_cnt reference
count, safe Rust code could call them in an unbalanced way. For instance,
calling enable_device() multiple times would inflate the count.
During driver unload, the cleanup path would only decrement it once, leaving
bus-mastering enabled and potentially leading to DMA-after-free when memory
buffers are freed. Should these be marked unsafe, or require an RAII guard
to track the enable count?
> + // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is guaranteed to be a pointer to a valid `struct pci_dev`.
> + unsafe { bindings::pci_disable_device(self.as_raw()) }
> + }
> +
> + /// Enable I/O and memory resources for this device, with automatic cleanup.
> + #[inline]
> + pub fn enable_device_managed(&self) -> Result {
> // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is guaranteed to be a pointer to a valid `struct pci_dev`.
> - to_result(unsafe { bindings::pci_enable_device_mem(self.as_raw()) })
> + to_result(unsafe { bindings::pcim_enable_device(self.as_raw()) })
> }
[Severity: High]
Will wrapping pcim_enable_device() cause double-free issues with IRQ vectors?
This function activates legacy C devres management for the device by setting
pdev->is_managed = true. If a driver later calls alloc_irq_vectors(), devres
will automatically register pcim_msi_release() as a cleanup action.
However, Rust's IrqVectorRegistration object also explicitly calls
pci_free_irq_vectors() on Drop. When the driver is unbound, Rust will drop
the registration (freeing the vectors), and then the devres subsystem will
execute pcim_msi_release(), attempting to free them again.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702-rust-pci-enable-device-managed-v1-1-75bc4ff2935c@mailbox.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 9:32 [PATCH] rust: pci: rework device enabling API Maurice Hieronymus
2026-07-02 9:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-02 21:47 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702094826.7122C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhi@mailbox.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox