From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, vkoul@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add non_ll_start() callback
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 21:36:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702213626.968BC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702-edma_ll-v3-7-877aa463740c@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Lockless channel state modification and list manipulation in dmaengine callbacks.
--
commit 962243519d7014f0b711fe65a08901734b5c7e22
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Add non_ll_start() callback
This commit adds a non_ll_start() callback and moves the common
non-linked-list channel handling into the EDMA core so it can be shared
by both the EDMA and HDMA.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> index bab4d49c92feb..e18d6e827c2c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -201,7 +202,16 @@ dw_edma_core_handle_int(struct dw_edma_irq *dw_irq, enum dw_edma_dir dir,
> static inline
> void dw_edma_core_start(struct dw_edma *dw, struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first)
> {
> - dw->core->start(chunk, first);
> + if (chunk->chan->non_ll) {
> + struct dw_edma_burst *child;
> +
> + child = list_first_entry_or_null(&chunk->burst->list,
> + struct dw_edma_burst, list);
> + if (child)
> + dw->core->non_ll_start(chunk->chan, child);
> + } else {
> + dw->core->start(chunk, first);
> + }
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does dw_edma_device_resume() modify
channel state and invoke dw_edma_start_transfer() locklessly?
Looking at drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c, if a client driver invokes
dmaengine_resume() (which calls dw_edma_device_resume()) concurrently with
the channel's interrupt handler dw_edma_done_interrupt() or dmaengine_submit(),
dw_edma_device_resume() modifies chan->status and calls
dw_edma_start_transfer() without acquiring chan->vc.lock:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c:dw_edma_device_resume() {
...
chan->status = EDMA_ST_BUSY;
dw_edma_start_transfer(chan);
...
}
Meanwhile, dw_edma_done_interrupt() and dw_edma_device_issue_pending()
execute dw_edma_start_transfer() with chan->vc.lock held.
If dw_edma_device_resume() and dw_edma_done_interrupt() run concurrently,
both can invoke dw_edma_start_transfer() on the same channel, read the same
descriptor via vchan_next_desc(&chan->vc), and perform state modifications on
it:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c:dw_edma_start_transfer() {
...
vd = vchan_next_desc(&chan->vc);
...
list_del(&child->list);
kfree(child);
...
}
Could this sequence lead to a double-free and list corruption?
Other functions like dw_edma_device_pause() and dw_edma_device_terminate_all()
appear to similarly manipulate channel state locklessly:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c:dw_edma_device_pause() {
...
chan->request = EDMA_REQ_PAUSE;
...
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702-edma_ll-v3-0-877aa463740c@nxp.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 21:21 [PATCH v3 00/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: flatten desc structions and simple code Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move control field update of DMA link to the last step Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add xfer_sz field to struct dw_edma_chunk Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move ll_region from struct dw_edma_chunk to struct dw_edma_chan Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass down dw_edma_chan to reduce one level of indirection Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add helper dw_(edma|hdma)_v0_core_ch_enable() Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add callbacks to fill link list entries Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add non_ll_start() callback Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use common dw_edma_core_start() for both eDMA and HDMA Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use burst array instead of linked list Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove struct dw_edma_chunk Frank.Li
2026-07-02 21:38 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702213626.968BC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox