From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pengpeng Hou" <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: cadence: add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 12:36:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260704123629.383BA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260704122835.14277-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Probe function silently masks initialization failures by returning 0 in its error path.
- [High] Driver data type mismatch leads to out-of-bounds memory access and kernel panic on shutdown and suspend.
--
commit 614cbd9081a5fd803fcc9fe1b172469d540e733c
Author: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
PCI: cadence: add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()
The driver has an OF match table wired to .of_match_table, but does
not export the table with MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE().
Add the missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ...) entry so module alias
information is generated for OF based module autoloading.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c
> index b067a3296dd37..a1ea24fc3b63f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id cdns_plat_pcie_of_match[] = {
> },
> {},
> };
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cdns_plat_pcie_of_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver cdns_plat_pcie_driver = {
> .driver = {
[Severity: High]
This isn't a regression introduced by this patch, but I noticed a pre-existing
regression with error handling in the probe function in this file.
In drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c:cdns_plat_pcie_probe():
ret = cdns_pcie_ep_setup(ep);
if (ret)
goto err_init;
...
err_init:
err_get_sync:
pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
cdns_pcie_disable_phy(cdns_plat_pcie->pcie);
phy_count = cdns_plat_pcie->pcie->phy_count;
while (phy_count--)
device_link_del(cdns_plat_pcie->pcie->link[phy_count]);
return 0;
Should this error path return the actual error code instead of returning 0?
Returning 0 unconditionally masks the probe failure. Does this cause the
driver core to register the device as successfully probed even when PHY or
host/endpoint setup fails, potentially leading to undefined behavior later?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing regression, but there appears to be a driver data
type mismatch that could lead to out-of-bounds memory access during shutdown
and suspend.
In drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c:cdns_plat_pcie_probe(),
the driver data is set to a struct cdns_plat_pcie pointer:
cdns_plat_pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cdns_plat_pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
...
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cdns_plat_pcie);
However, in cdns_plat_pcie_shutdown(), it is retrieved and cast as a
struct cdns_pcie pointer:
static void cdns_plat_pcie_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct cdns_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
...
cdns_pcie_disable_phy(pcie);
}
The same incorrect cast happens in drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c
during suspend and resume operations:
static int cdns_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct cdns_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
cdns_pcie_disable_phy(pcie);
return 0;
}
static int cdns_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct cdns_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
int ret;
ret = cdns_pcie_enable_phy(pcie);
...
}
Since struct cdns_plat_pcie is an 8-byte wrapper containing the actual struct
cdns_pcie pointer, does casting it directly to struct cdns_pcie cause
cdns_pcie_disable_phy() and cdns_pcie_enable_phy() to read out-of-bounds
memory when accessing fields like pcie->phy_count and pcie->phy?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260704122835.14277-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-04 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-04 12:28 [PATCH] PCI: cadence: add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() Pengpeng Hou
2026-07-04 12:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260704123629.383BA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox