From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, vkoul@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move ll_region from struct dw_edma_chunk to struct dw_edma_chan
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 18:46:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708184624.88E0E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-edma_ll-v4-3-cc128f0afb61@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] dw_edma_device_resume() accesses and modifies channel states and calls dw_edma_start_transfer() without holding the channel lock.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 03/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move ll_region from struct dw_edma_chunk to struct dw_edma_chan ---
commit 1e85ecaff6d1547be3e5049908d131f91651e11f
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Move ll_region from struct dw_edma_chunk to struct dw_edma_chan
ll_region is identical for all chunks belonging to the same DMA channel,
so there is no need to copy it into each chunk. Move ll_region to
struct dw_edma_chan to avoid redundant copies.
Tested-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index 53469c8c8b82e..2652ad8e7a8f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
[ ... ]
While reviewing this file, I noticed a pre-existing issue in dw_edma_device_resume():
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c:dw_edma_device_resume() {
...
} else if (chan->request != EDMA_REQ_NONE) {
err = -EPERM;
} else {
chan->status = EDMA_ST_BUSY;
dw_edma_start_transfer(chan);
}
return err;
}
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed that
dw_edma_device_resume() modifies the channel state and calls
dw_edma_start_transfer() without holding the channel lock.
The vchan_next_desc() function, which is called by dw_edma_start_transfer(),
explicitly asserts lockdep_assert_held(&vc->lock). Modifying channel state
and manipulating virt-dma lists without holding chan->vc.lock can cause data
races and list corruption.
Any client driver triggering a channel resume will consistently hit the
lockdep splat and risk kernel panics from list corruption.
Could we acquire chan->vc.lock before updating chan->status and calling
dw_edma_start_transfer() here?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708-edma_ll-v4-0-cc128f0afb61@nxp.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 18:35 [PATCH v4 00/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: flatten desc structions and simple code Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move control field update of DMA link to the last step Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add xfer_sz field to struct dw_edma_chunk Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move ll_region from struct dw_edma_chunk to struct dw_edma_chan Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass down dw_edma_chan to reduce one level of indirection Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add helper dw_(edma|hdma)_v0_core_ch_enable() Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add callbacks to fill link list entries Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add non_ll_start() callback Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use common dw_edma_core_start() for both eDMA and HDMA Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use burst array instead of linked list Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 18:35 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove struct dw_edma_chunk Frank.Li
2026-07-08 18:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 11:33 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: flatten desc structions and simple code Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708184624.88E0E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox