From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ADBA153BE9; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783702608; cv=none; b=grwYO6JSobCMorL4ik8guFufHLAZ/vNCu/SeEE0Xwc45l88R2lyua5nLvtjDVoX1M4K2LNXT/GSqd+/TVMzh0E+JHLlObCZ9TgXERbJ67wdyYvBzBtoHe06FEncn0rSo6Wx3ypDDEf2nmE22k3T3Ft9Qiyy8iXUemg3XK2fvxnA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783702608; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2HTfP0sK3d3rKA3xYarhZYjpCPp/waa7ghFixUdcvGs=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=ugJ6jAATYVWBXg5q4fAGPC6u9r5n1jqa8n0fKee/LQea4a/aMW7nsVqmxy4up/3+MIyhKyyAJ1KxCdYQa2CtXPNXL/bylfqzmI4Ecqz9ntnxRCFibnqz7doZ+iAgMNissy0RahRZL5ac15Oz4llYg8MzJAqgUdsoNzHAswCk3wc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dmofAJ68; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dmofAJ68" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B160F1F000E9; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:56:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783702607; bh=2HTfP0sK3d3rKA3xYarhZYjpCPp/waa7ghFixUdcvGs=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=dmofAJ68qW1/S0QwR7HpqKaKJQ2Vp2iu8aSLw+FuoX4+c7UGKcBuixXx7t+aDF9QJ pAWMalXO1Vh5QiCbqgcfq/sfImm2OflHkAolXIk8+5Is7ZQg52TLb3Kd/0N9nIAHix V1Y2CjjH5Z6eg7q0naLPspf1Fhg6dECK+ip8AzHbAVa3blwGFFi8FdK9uW5hkeE0hI 9M+fUikPzvMv9uDh6wbiK1j7UEVg+hj3ftQS3bZhOEOrAnN/cu0gDlH0dkj4G7diW4 w+KxRDAOw3SzN5pDwCdYs+aJ4LZl6O6chl6qQgJGpWaxQuJAi1xxJhrZqX9L6/1GJG Byw1XCc8k2SUA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add xfer_sz field to struct dw_edma_chunk Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20260710-edma_ll-v6-2-1471d278b73a@nxp.com> References: <20260710-edma_ll-v6-0-1471d278b73a@nxp.com> <20260710-edma_ll-v6-2-1471d278b73a@nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:56:46 +0000 Message-Id: <20260710165646.B160F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Frank Li >=20 > Reusing ll_region.sz as the transfer size is misleading because > ll_region.sz represents the memory size of the EDMA link list, not the > amount of data to be transferred. >=20 > Add a new xfer_sz field to explicitly indicate the total transfer size > of a chunk. >=20 > Tested-by: Koichiro Den > Signed-off-by: Frank Li Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710-edma_ll-v6= -0-1471d278b73a@nxp.com?part=3D2