From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A02283537D0; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783716413; cv=none; b=siKMkr9FMkLpwb7Heq2DRSZVjavjAk9C6pqmMBL/StuUYTJ8/eYZZuqqwzPam9RyESIMSQTTz7+HGLwxwhgHoawtFhuOR0PTlzdgZba4C9Ngghtd+/m9THtkYqNxoM6DH0YkkszcZSecxxVUboPFnwzg+2Lb+WKX+iYjjz3xaS0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783716413; c=relaxed/simple; bh=O/nH8NFFtDf39iVENkiFt/8hgUDNcbuSKoU/4iTc8RM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G4g57IAFWWGV3qIMkDNm1ajbFIvLMac27iRbWvhlMQQSE1M5g+9bxfuV3ZiM6LPQOY5t0c+6pYOTCpJbreACFJwFno61F2z5dbOCreVlxknrJ77Ku6vdguj1JSvCbmuPRgWt5b0v8xoSXt0OJyZtOwXUBctLchbQTyqdR4RLZIc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Dd1oVQ5S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Dd1oVQ5S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 036F31F000E9; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:46:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783716412; bh=4FXuD88xnQiyJIRdYMZFBXUOXQg1ApsCo+B8ICNsSeY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=Dd1oVQ5SswVaWQAJ4Sh0rPhuwFNetoGiB/rMHf1oYG4qH5X0aRVbX2xisgA8ahbd2 oKKxKRE3UU/wcBzvSZcYwKRRU2x0z4tSrpz5+9fxHlkys/VnG7jXETm68pqnatOE0t xfmoXqziVfLbhVDw5jZYTnvq60fFn4dg0zsuKmFFSKyyGlFp/bFQvl21D4uI1t/t74 /qo+GcJXuLRo9qF5wz619eh6Adx9yUoIJvM3D+sCU/tP+qHYhkhGHp98cfhjnO8juy IVqGu1ZmRTc9KtlWm38twV2cf4hX5CWBIQEDq7BZTzIUoGRWO2zxavzCeFF67M7eMS vtDEA8Z4QFgIg== Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:46:50 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Rosen Penev Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/pci: consolidate x86-specific PCI quirks into arch/x86/pci/fixup.c Message-ID: <20260710204650.GA998073@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260707221800.920270-1-rosenp@gmail.com> On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 03:17:52PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > This series moves all x86-specific PCI quirks from the generic > drivers/pci/quirks.c into arch/x86/pci/fixup.c, where they > architecturally belong. This reduces the ifdef burden in the generic > quirk file and improves build granularity by gating the x86 fixups > behind CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS. > > The series is organized as a preparatory commit followed by one > commit per vendor/family, keeping each move reviewable. > > Suggested by: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20161221142607.GA8594@infradead.org/ > > Rosen Penev (8): > x86/pci: gate arch fixups with CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS > x86/pci: move Intel chipset quirks to arch/x86/pci/fixup.c > x86/pci: move VIA chipset quirks to arch/x86/pci/fixup.c > x86/pci: move SiS chipset quirks to arch/x86/pci/fixup.c > x86/pci: move ALi chipset quirks to arch/x86/pci/fixup.c > x86/pci: move AMD x86 chipset quirks to arch/x86/pci/fixup.c > x86/pci: move x86 ifdef-gated quirks to arch/x86/pci/fixup.c > x86/pci: move remaining x86-specific quirks to fixup.c > > arch/x86/pci/Makefile | 2 +- > arch/x86/pci/fixup.c | 2284 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/pci.h | 3 + > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 2330 +---------------------------------------- > 4 files changed, 2316 insertions(+), 2303 deletions(-) I don't object to any of this from a PCI perspective, so I guess it's up to the x86 folks if they want them. It looks like the typical subject line style in fixup.c is: x86/PCI: ...