From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F6D436BFE for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784129249; cv=none; b=U3XcXlLN1DHR8xBq2zmHGEdk0bydMumzYVpK4Zn7pkfmn6XtoVjwXUDGhFqUGYHRsKmgDmmhXzT/fwc3ttnR5/5lrm89MZx0a5PQ93h/oGBxayqtefK62gJtwjg5cM4CfI0ygANEpLTQZ2/nFOtC5XExbCwBj6ZU8ZR9duObt1E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784129249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TjjbHlQtj9ADoah3kZpCqt5oQ8kPlSofvQ0rvq6gnwA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=MQd+zk6WxxqEY/9NlKaCF8J2WK6VLKd8H8B+t27mD47jTBSCeOk/EFQqQ/IpHnjefk95BRjNPwXbgxsg3Np7wOSq3ZBDgX+I8M2rkgPeC9mNgy+iSXeCoZpV/Iyv0kBErd/6EffoY0enaTOAlj6b51VfB95ZLl+f+ru+UyXs/04= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eIU55+M1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eIU55+M1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA65C1F000E9; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:27:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784129247; bh=TjjbHlQtj9ADoah3kZpCqt5oQ8kPlSofvQ0rvq6gnwA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=eIU55+M1v5zhB1Wlqyqtw7osAkcAApXv+VH5bFEuDoJZolkPB0oOhu0/jJAvTBF2j wGAf3he+3ta4pPGGhNZgNtsrofflmZcyDKbW3IPlrtqu6z3AlutGsHjA3PvbEYBQD7 FPbt76GAia4//ItiAhwf0xbAD4SY9PLDSeonU5hwEv7Gye9rbF8zN4DKTvExhslx1O vDKKAdpx9cLocq8meZTvMk0m4xrJnQdib7G5P2YvwVRNApCCao2uPfMoRSxw4uCQEN kdxTjxyS6Y2A2zyY2k36g+SZFPRlXL+os6m67iBlKgOpBMGc2mqV1beXBAL8g5kYY8 HJVmpWdu+YYjQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: PCI: Introduce acpi_dev_get_pci_dev() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1961532.tdWV9SEqCh@rafael.j.wysocki> References: <5115219.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki> <1961532.tdWV9SEqCh@rafael.j.wysocki> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:27:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20260715152727.BA65C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >=20 > Some acpi_get_pci_dev() callers already have a struct ACPI device for > which they want to get the struct pci_dev pointer of the associated > PCI device, so they don't need to look for one. >=20 > For this reason, add acpi_dev_get_pci_dev() that will get a PCI device > for a given ACPI one (if possible) and turn acpi_get_pci_dev() into > a static inline helper passing the acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() return value > directly to acpi_dev_get_pci_dev(). >=20 > No intentional functional impact. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/5115219.31r3eYUQgx@= rafael.j.wysocki?part=3D2