From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: rzg3s: Disable refclk on probe failure
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:43:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715224349.134DF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715223019.3002237-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] The patch violates hardware teardown order by disabling the PCIe reference clock before asserting controller resets.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Missing IRQ cleanup for chained INTx handlers on probe failure leads to use-after-free.
- [High] MMIO register access after PM runtime clock gating in suspend path causes system hang.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: rzg3s: Disable refclk on probe failure ---
commit 0d4ef239e6084c21b4710c1db03e3a6365363533
Author: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: PCI: rzg3s: Disable refclk on probe failure
This commit disables the PCIe reference clock when the probe function fails.
It adds a call to clk_disable_unprepare in the error path, ensuring the
clock is balanced if initialization fails.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rzg3s-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rzg3s-host.c
> index 66f687304c1cb..bd6471a7fb7a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rzg3s-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rzg3s-host.c
> @@ -1762,6 +1762,7 @@ static int rzg3s_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> host_probe_teardown:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->port.refclk);
[Severity: Medium]
Does this new addition violate the hardware teardown order by disabling the
reference clock before asserting controller resets?
During setup, the reference clock is enabled prior to calling
config_post_init() which deasserts resets. In this new error path,
clk_disable_unprepare() is called before host->data->config_deinit(host).
Could disabling the clock while the core is out of reset leave the state
machine hanging or undefined? Should the clock disable be moved after the
config_deinit() call to maintain strict LIFO initialization order?
> rzg3s_pcie_teardown_irqdomain(host);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the teardown function fail to clean
up chained handlers on probe failure?
Looking at rzg3s_pcie_teardown_irqdomain(), it removes the IRQ domain but
does not unregister the chained INTx hardware handlers:
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rzg3s-host.c:rzg3s_pcie_teardown_irqdomain() {
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
rzg3s_pcie_teardown_msi(host);
irq_domain_remove(host->intx_domain);
}
If pci_host_probe() fails and the devres mechanism frees the host structure,
could a shared or spurious INTx interrupt firing later cause
rzg3s_pcie_intx_irq_handler() to dereference the freed host pointer? Should
this call irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, NULL, NULL) to prevent a
use-after-free?
> host->data->config_deinit(host);
> rpm_put:
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the suspend path cause a system hang
due to MMIO access after PM runtime clock gating?
In rzg3s_pcie_suspend_noirq(), the driver disables the device PM domain
clocks before calling the hardware de-initialization routine:
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rzg3s-host.c:rzg3s_pcie_suspend_noirq() {
...
ret = pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
clk_disable_unprepare(port->refclk);
/* SoC-specific de-initialization */
ret = data->config_deinit(host);
...
}
For the RZ/G3E SoC, the de-initialization callback performs an MMIO write:
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rzg3s-host.c:rzg3e_pcie_config_deinit() {
writel_relaxed(0, host->axi + RZG3S_PCI_RESET);
return 0;
}
Will accessing this MMIO region while the bus clock is gated trigger a fatal
bus fault on ARM64 during system suspend? Should the de-initialization
happen before pm_runtime_put_sync() is called?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715223019.3002237-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 22:30 [PATCH 0/3] PCI: rzg3s: Fix issues in cleanup paths Prabhakar
2026-07-15 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: rzg3s: Disable refclk on probe failure Prabhakar
2026-07-15 22:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: rzg3s: Propagate platform_get_irq_byname() errors Prabhakar
2026-07-15 22:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: rzg3s: Fix IRQ domain initialization error handling Prabhakar
2026-07-15 22:39 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715224349.134DF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox