Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Soeren Moch <smoch@web.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Keep Root Port MSI capability also for i.MX6Q
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:27:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716222704.GA240248@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716214054.47372-1-smoch@web.de>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 11:40:54PM +0200, Soeren Moch wrote:
> On the NXP i.MX6Q chipset MSIs from the endpoints won't be received by
> the iMSI-RX MSI controller if the Root Port MSI capability is disabled.
> 
> Even though the Root Port MSIs won't be received by the iMSI-RX controller
> due to design, this chipset has some weird hardware bug that prevents
> the endpoint MSIs from reaching when the Root Port MSI capability is
> disabled.
> 
> Hence, always keep the Root Port MSI capability for this chipset.
> 
> Note that by keeping Root Port MSI capability, Root Port MSIs such as AER,
> PME and others won't be received by default. So users need to use
> workarounds such as passing 'pcie_pme=nomsi' cmdline param.

I'd like to align the subject a little more with 3a4e8302e72f and
avoid repeating the ".. from reaching when the Root Port MSI ..." part
of the commit log, which seems to be missing a word.  So I propose the
following (if you think it's accurate):

  PCI: imx6: Keep i.MX6Q Root Port MSI capability with iMSI-RX to work around hardware bug

  On some NXP chipsets, disabling Root Port MSI/MSI-X Capabilities blocks
  MSIs originating from Endpoints from reaching the iMSI-RX controller.

  To address this hardware bug, 3a4e8302e72f ("PCI: imx6: Keep Root Port MSI
  capability with iMSI-RX to work around hardware bug") preserves Root Port
  MSI and MSI-X Capabilities on i.MX7D, i.MX8MM, and i.MX8MQ when iMSI-RX is
  in use.

  The same applies to i.MX6Q, so preserve Root Port MSI/MSI-X Capabilities
  there as well.

  Note that preserving these Capabilities means Root Port-originated MSIs
  such as AER and PME won't be received due to separate hardware limitations.
  Users may need to use workarounds such as passing the 'pcie_pme=nomsi'
  command-line parameter.

Also, we need to resolve the Sashiko question about whether IMX6QP and
IMX6SX also need this.  NXP folks, can you verify?

> Fixes: f5cd8a929c825 ("PCI: dwc: Remove MSI/MSIX capability for Root Port if iMSI-RX is used as MSI controller")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 7.0+
> Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch <smoch@web.de>
> Acked-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> ---
> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Cc: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> This patch is similar to
> 3a4e8302e72f ("PCI: imx6: Keep Root Port MSI capability with iMSI-RX to work around hardware bug")
> 
> Tested on a tbs2910 board [1]
> [1] arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-tbs2910.dts
> 
> changes in v2:
> - collect a-b and r-b tags
> - use correct fixes tag (Manivannan)
>   (reference commit that introduced the bug, not the incomplete fix)
> 
> Since this is a fix for a regression in linux-7.0+, can this still be merged for 7.2-rcS ?
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 98e1db751132..8130cf93c2bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -1995,7 +1995,8 @@ static const struct imx_pcie_drvdata drvdata[] = {
>  		.flags = IMX_PCIE_FLAG_IMX_PHY |
>  			 IMX_PCIE_FLAG_SPEED_CHANGE_WORKAROUND |
>  			 IMX_PCIE_FLAG_BROKEN_SUSPEND |
> -			 IMX_PCIE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SUSPEND,
> +			 IMX_PCIE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SUSPEND |
> +			 IMX_PCIE_FLAG_KEEP_MSI_CAP,
>  		.dbi_length = 0x200,
>  		.gpr = "fsl,imx6q-iomuxc-gpr",
>  		.ltssm_off = IOMUXC_GPR12,
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-16 21:40 [PATCH v2] PCI: imx6: Keep Root Port MSI capability also for i.MX6Q Soeren Moch
2026-07-16 21:51 ` sashiko-bot
     [not found]   ` <e793aa45-746f-4b49-967d-bb997607ff55@web.de>
2026-07-16 22:04     ` Soeren Moch
2026-07-16 22:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-07-17  2:48   ` Hongxing Zhu
2026-07-17  7:54   ` Soeren Moch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260716222704.GA240248@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=smoch@web.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox