Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, john.g.garry@oracle.com, mlombard@redhat.com,
	 loberman@redhat.com, mclapinski@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
	 driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	 Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	jordanrichards@google.com, souravsgl@google.com,
	 stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, emilne@redhat.com,
	jmeneghi@redhat.com,  linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>,
	 David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v19 1/7] device_core: rely on put_device to free dev->p
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 23:04:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716230411.2767394-2-tarunsahu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716230411.2767394-1-tarunsahu@google.com>

device_add allocate private_data for device and assigns to
dev->p. If device_add fails in later steps of the function,
it cleans up this dev->p which is not necessary because In
the next call, put_device free it anyway (if reference to
the device is 0 which will be unless someone concurrently
get the reference to this device).

This avoids unnecessary races introduced in system. After device
is added in device_kset->list by device_add and later steps in the
device_add function failures occur, it will free dev->p manually,
while in between there might be a user of device_kset->list will
take reference to the device just added by device_add. and might
try to access dev->p. So relying on put_device to free dev->p
prevents such problem.

Signed-off-by: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/base/core.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 4d026682944f..76ba02c26aa5 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -2614,6 +2614,7 @@ static void device_release(struct kobject *kobj)
 	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
 	struct device_private *p = dev->p;
 
+	dev->p = NULL;
 	/*
 	 * Some platform devices are driven without driver attached
 	 * and managed resources may have been acquired.  Make sure
@@ -3824,8 +3825,6 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev)
 parent_error:
 	put_device(parent);
 name_error:
-	kfree(dev->p);
-	dev->p = NULL;
 	goto done;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_add);
-- 
2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17  2:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-16 23:04 [PATCH v19 0/7] shut down devices asynchronously Tarun Sahu
2026-07-16 23:04 ` Tarun Sahu [this message]
2026-07-17  3:04   ` [PATCH v19 1/7] device_core: rely on put_device to free dev->p sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 23:04 ` [PATCH v19 2/7] driver core: Prevent device_add() during system shutdown Tarun Sahu
2026-07-17  3:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 23:04 ` [PATCH v19 3/7] driver core: separate function to shutdown one device Tarun Sahu
2026-07-17  2:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 23:04 ` [PATCH v19 4/7] driver core: do not always lock parent in shutdown Tarun Sahu
2026-07-17  2:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 23:04 ` [PATCH v19 5/7] driver core: async device shutdown infrastructure Tarun Sahu
2026-07-17  2:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 23:04 ` [PATCH v19 6/7] PCI: Enable async shutdown support Tarun Sahu
2026-07-17  2:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 23:04 ` [PATCH v19 7/7] scsi: " Tarun Sahu
2026-07-17  3:00   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260716230411.2767394-2-tarunsahu@google.com \
    --to=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jordanrichards@google.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mclapinski@google.com \
    --cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=souravsgl@google.com \
    --cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox