Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: nirmal.patel@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] PCI: vmd: Add feature to scan BIOS enumerated devices.
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:21:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720142118.00000309@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720183555.GA354351@bhelgaas>

On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:35:55 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 04:50:25PM +0000, Nirmal Patel wrote:
> > Newer VMD  with device ID 0x28c1 has unique settings compared to its
> > predecessor where BIOS enumerates the entire VMD device tree and
> > assigns respective configurations.
> > 
> > VMD configuration BAR0 carries over from GNR legacy VMD as the
> > mechanism to access the configuration space of the devices owned by
> > VMD. The size of this window is fixed at 256 MB, where each
> > function consumes 4 KB and every bus consumes 1 MB.
> > 
> > The shadow and scratchpad registers have been relocated from the VMD
> > configuration space to the VMD MMIO space in VMD BAR4/BAR5,
> > otherwise refers to as MEMBAR2 or MSI-X bar.
> > 
> > VMD MSI-X remapping enable/disable is no longer supported.
> > 
> > All the VMD driver code needs to do is to obtain bus hide range
> > along with shadow register values set by BIOS and perform a bus
> > scan.
> > 
> > The commit also involves small refactoring of vmd_enable_domain
> > function. ...  
> 
> > +static int vmd_prepare_offsets_and_bus(struct vmd_dev *vmd,
> > +					unsigned long features,
> > +					resource_size_t
> > *membar2_offset,
> > +					resource_size_t *offset1,
> > +					resource_size_t *offset2)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Shadow registers may exist in certain VMD device ids
> > which allow
> > +	 * guests to correctly assign host physical addresses to
> > the root ports
> > +	 * and child devices. These registers will either return
> > the host value
> > +	 * or 0, depending on an enable bit in the VMD device.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * For certain VMD devices (i.e. 0x28C1), BIOS places
> > device info
> > +	 * in BAR4 shadow registers to determine the base bus
> > number and memory
> > +	 * offsets.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (features & VMD_FEAT_USE_BIOS_INFO) {
> > +		*membar2_offset = MEMBAR2_OFFSET_28C1;
> > +		ret = vmd_get_bus_info_from_bar4(vmd, offset1,
> > offset2);  
> 
> Is it guaranteed that for device 0x28C1, BIOS will *always* do the
> enumeration?  Sounds like a rev-lock between this device and the BIOS,
> i.e., this device can't be used at all with an old BIOS that doesn't
> know how to do that enumeration?

It is guaranteed for BIOS enumeration for 28c1. They have changed the
hardware to such that with new changes, there is no backward
compatibility. i.e. 28c0 bios can't work with 28c1 and vice versa.

> 
> > @@ -1114,6 +1228,10 @@ static const struct pci_device_id vmd_ids[]
> > = { .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW |
> >  				VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> >  				VMD_FEAT_CAN_BYPASS_MSI_REMAP,},
> > +	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_28C1),
> > +		.driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW |
> > +				VMD_FEAT_CAN_BYPASS_MSI_REMAP |
> > +				VMD_FEAT_USE_BIOS_INFO,},
> >  	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x467f),
> >  		.driver_data = VMD_FEATS_CLIENT,},
> >  	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x4c3d),  


      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29 16:50 [PATCH v7] PCI: vmd: Add feature to scan BIOS enumerated devices Nirmal Patel
2026-06-29 17:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15  5:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-20 18:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-20 21:21   ` Nirmal Patel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260720142118.00000309@linux.intel.com \
    --to=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=nirmal.patel@intel.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox