Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/sysfs: Avoid spurious runtime PM wakeup on config space accesses
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:59:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720205925.BB1961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720204356.1501749-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org>

> Currently, the boundary checks in pci_read_config() and
> pci_write_config() reject only offsets beyond the effective
> configuration space size.
> 
> Thus, an access at an offset exactly equal to that size passes
> the check, has its length clamped to zero, and then invokes
> pci_config_pm_runtime_get() and pci_config_pm_runtime_put()
> around transfer blocks that do nothing.
> 
> This is a problem because pci_config_pm_runtime_get() synchronously
> resumes the upstream bridge through pm_runtime_get_sync(), and resumes
> the device itself through pm_runtime_resume() when it is in D3cold,
> only for the handler to return zero immediately afterwards.  Such a
> spurious wakeup wastes power and adds needless resume latency.
> 
> The sysfs core already clamps accesses against the attribute size set
> through the bin_size() callback, which reports either 256 or 4096
> bytes.  As such, the affected accesses are reads at offset 64 (or 128
> for CardBus devices) through files opened without CAP_SYS_ADMIN, and
> reads and writes at the exact configuration space size on devices
> where a quirk sets a non-standard size.
> 
> Therefore, reject accesses at the boundary offset as well, so that
> they return early before any runtime PM involvement, matching the
> procfs implementations in proc_bus_pci_read() and proc_bus_pci_write().
> 
> The value returned to userspace at these offsets remains zero,
> so the change is not visible to userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@kernel.org>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720204356.1501749-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org?part=1


      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20 20:43 [PATCH] PCI/sysfs: Avoid spurious runtime PM wakeup on config space accesses Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-07-20 20:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260720205925.BB1961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox