From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/sysfs: Avoid spurious runtime PM wakeup on config space accesses
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:59:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720205925.BB1961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720204356.1501749-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org>
> Currently, the boundary checks in pci_read_config() and
> pci_write_config() reject only offsets beyond the effective
> configuration space size.
>
> Thus, an access at an offset exactly equal to that size passes
> the check, has its length clamped to zero, and then invokes
> pci_config_pm_runtime_get() and pci_config_pm_runtime_put()
> around transfer blocks that do nothing.
>
> This is a problem because pci_config_pm_runtime_get() synchronously
> resumes the upstream bridge through pm_runtime_get_sync(), and resumes
> the device itself through pm_runtime_resume() when it is in D3cold,
> only for the handler to return zero immediately afterwards. Such a
> spurious wakeup wastes power and adds needless resume latency.
>
> The sysfs core already clamps accesses against the attribute size set
> through the bin_size() callback, which reports either 256 or 4096
> bytes. As such, the affected accesses are reads at offset 64 (or 128
> for CardBus devices) through files opened without CAP_SYS_ADMIN, and
> reads and writes at the exact configuration space size on devices
> where a quirk sets a non-standard size.
>
> Therefore, reject accesses at the boundary offset as well, so that
> they return early before any runtime PM involvement, matching the
> procfs implementations in proc_bus_pci_read() and proc_bus_pci_write().
>
> The value returned to userspace at these offsets remains zero,
> so the change is not visible to userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720204356.1501749-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 20:43 [PATCH] PCI/sysfs: Avoid spurious runtime PM wakeup on config space accesses Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-07-20 20:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720205925.BB1961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox