From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, cassel@kernel.org,
dlemoal@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:02:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724220209.1A0CF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-pci_id_fix-v4-7-3580726844e1@garyguo.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-After-Free in PCI device probe due to unprotected dynamic ID pointer.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device ---
commit 6e87a7c82585926a2bb69878be8d34b27c58a215
Author: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device
PCI dynamic ID needs to match IDs against a new ID to see if it already
exists. Existing APIs can only match IDs against devices, causing the
dynamic ID insertion code to create a temporary device only for matching
purpose. Rename pci_match_one_device() to pci_match_one_id() so it can be
used for this purpose instead; add a pci_id_from_device() helper to make it
easy to convert users.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index f36778e62ac1a..c9424edb45481 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -145,10 +162,11 @@ static const struct pci_device_id *pci_match_device(struct pci_driver *drv,
> if (ret == 0)
> return NULL;
>
> + dev_id = pci_id_from_device(dev);
> /* Look at the dynamic ids first, before the static ones */
> spin_lock(&drv->dynids.lock);
> list_for_each_entry(dynid, &drv->dynids.list, node) {
> - if (pci_match_one_device(&dynid->id, dev)) {
> + if (pci_match_one_id(&dynid->id, &dev_id)) {
> found_id = &dynid->id;
> break;
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -158,7 +176,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id *pci_match_device(struct pci_driver *drv,
> if (found_id)
> return found_id;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this returned found_id
pointer lead to a use-after-free?
Looking at pci_match_device(), if it matches a dynamic ID, it sets found_id
to &dynid->id and then drops drv->dynids.lock before returning the pointer.
If a concurrent write to the driver's remove_id sysfs attribute occurs,
remove_id_store() will acquire the same lock, remove the dynamic ID from the
list, and free it:
drivers/pci/pci-driver.c:remove_id_store() {
...
list_del(&dynid->node);
kfree(dynid);
retval = count;
break;
...
}
Wouldn't the probe path then pass this dangling pointer to the driver's probe
function?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-pci_id_fix-v4-0-3580726844e1@garyguo.net?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 22:00 [PATCH v4 0/9] PCI: Fix UAF and TOCTOU related to dynamic ID Gary Guo
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] ata: ata_generic: don't store pci_device_id Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] scsi: nsp32: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] ipack: tpci200: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] mlxsw: pci: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] agp/via: Don't rely on address of pci_device_id Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] agp/amd-k7: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] PCI: Fix UAF when probe runs concurrent to dyn ID removal Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 22:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724220209.1A0CF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox